Institutional reforms and dynamics of agricultural growth in China

被引:8
|
作者
Lin, JYF
机构
[1] HONG KONG UNIV SCI & TECHNOL,DEPT ECON,KOWLOON,HONG KONG
[2] AUSTRALIAN NATL UNIV,CANBERRA,ACT 2601,AUSTRALIA
关键词
China; collective farming; institutional change; reforms; international trade;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
F3 [农业经济];
学科分类号
0202 ; 020205 ; 1203 ;
摘要
The collective farming system, the state-monopolized procurement and marketing system, and the grain self-sufficient policy, formed in the early 1950s, made the rapid development of heavy industries possible in China, However, they were detrimental to farmers' incentives and resulted in a serious misallocation of resources, Consequently, despite sharp improvements in technology and increases in the use of modern inputs, grain production in China barely kept up with population growth before the 1979 reform, The shift from the collective farming system to the household-based farming system in 1979 greatly improved farmers' incentive and resulted in a sharp increase of grain output in the early 1980s, In the late 1980s, grain production stagnated again because the incompleteness of procurement system reform made the production of grain unprofitable, For producing enough grain to feed China's ever-increasing population, it is imperative for the Chinese government to liberalize the grain procurement and marketing system and to invest in yield-improvement research, It is also desirable for China to adjust her trade policy and to import more grain for meeting domestic grain demands. (C) 1997 Elsevier Science Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:201 / 212
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Static Electricity: Institutional and Ideational Barriers to China’s Market Reforms
    Michael R. Davidson
    Margaret M. Pearson
    [J]. Studies in Comparative International Development, 2022, 57 : 385 - 409
  • [42] China's economic reforms and growth prospects
    Lardy, Nicholas
    [J]. CHINA ECONOMIC JOURNAL, 2015, 8 (02) : 95 - 108
  • [43] Static Electricity: Institutional and Ideational Barriers to China's Market Reforms
    Davidson, Michael R.
    Pearson, Margaret M.
    [J]. STUDIES IN COMPARATIVE INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT, 2022, 57 (03) : 385 - 409
  • [44] Institutional Reforms in Italy
    Wawrzyniak, Jan
    [J]. PRZEGLAD SEJMOWY, 2007, (06): : 135 - 142
  • [45] Limits to institutional reforms
    Eggertsson, T
    [J]. SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 1998, 100 (01): : 335 - 357
  • [46] INFLUENCE OF INSTITUTIONAL STRUCTURES ON THE LABOR DYNAMICS IN THE AGRICULTURAL INDUSTRY
    Rakhaev, Kh. M.
    Eneeva, M. N.
    Israilov, M. V.
    [J]. SOCIAL AND CULTURAL TRANSFORMATIONS IN THE CONTEXT OF MODERN GLOBALISM (SCTCGM 2018), 2019, 58 : 2193 - 2199
  • [47] THE IMPACT OF CHINAS ECONOMIC-REFORMS ON AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTIVITY GROWTH
    MCMILLAN, J
    WHALLEY, J
    ZHU, LJ
    [J]. JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 1989, 97 (04) : 781 - 807
  • [48] Institutional causes and countermeasures for agricultural chemical pollution in China
    School of Humanities and Social Science, East China Jiao-tong University, Nanchang
    330013, China
    不详
    [J]. Nat. Environ. Pollut. Technol., 3 (509-516):
  • [49] How to promote institutional reforms in the agricultural sector? A case study of Uganda's National Agricultural Advisory Services (NAADS)
    Rwamigisa, Patience B.
    Birner, Regina
    Mangheni, Margaret N.
    Semana, Arseni
    [J]. DEVELOPMENT POLICY REVIEW, 2018, 36 (05) : 607 - 627
  • [50] Reforms of the Agricultural Bank of China Can Policy and Commercial Objectives Be Reconciled?
    Cheng, Yuk-shing
    [J]. CHINESE ECONOMY, 2009, 42 (05) : 79 - 97