A new prognostic model for FIGO stage 1 epithelial ovarian cancer

被引:28
|
作者
Obermair, Andreas
Fuller, Arlan
Lopez-Varela, Elisa
van Gorp, Toon
Vergote, Ignace
Eaton, Lynne
Fowler, Jeff
Quinn, Michael
Hammond, Ian
Marsden, Donald
Proietto, Anthony
Carter, Jonathan
Davy, Margaret
Tripcony, Lee
Abu-Rustum, Nadeem
机构
[1] Univ Queensland, Royal Brisbane Hosp, Sch Med, Queensland Ctr Gynaecol Canc, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
[2] Harvard Univ, Sch Med, Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Gillette Ctr Womens Canc, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[3] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Univ Hosp, Dept Gynaecol Oncol, Louvain, Belgium
[4] Ohio State Univ, James Canc Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Div Gynecol Oncol, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
[5] Ohio State Univ, Solove Res Inst, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
[6] King Edward Mem Hosp Women, Western Australian Gynaecol Canc Serv, Subiaco, WA 6008, Australia
[7] Univ Western Australia, Sch Womens & Infants Hlth, Nedlands, WA 6009, Australia
[8] Royal Hosp Women, Gynaecol Canc Ctr, Randwick, NSW, Australia
[9] Royal Prince Alfred Hosp, Sydney Gynaecol Oncol Grp, Camperdown, NSW, Australia
[10] Royal Adelaide Hosp, Dept Gynaecol Oncol, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia
[11] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, New York, NY 10021 USA
关键词
ovarian cancer; prognosis; CA-125; staging;
D O I
10.1016/j.ygyno.2006.09.021
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background. No consensus exists which patients with surgical stage I epithelial ovarian should receive postoperative chemotherapy. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the prognostic impact of preoperative CA-125 and to establish a prognostic index to identify patients in different risk categories. Methods. Data of 600 surgically staged patients with FIGO stage 1 EOC treated in eleven gynecological cancer centers in Australia, the USA and Europe were analyzed. Eligible patients include those with invasive EOC where a preoperative CA-125 was obtained and standard surgical staging performed. Overall survival (OS) was chosen as study endpoint. Preoperative CA-125 values were compared with other prognostic factors, and univariate and multivariate Cox models were calculated. Results. Two hundred and one patients (33.5%) had preoperative CA-125 <= 30 U/ml and CA-125 levels <= 30 U/ml were associated with lower grade,substage IA and mucinous histologic cell type. Patients with elevated CA-125 levels were more likely to receive chemotherapy. OS probability was 95% and 85% for patients with pretreatment CA-125 <= 30 U/ml and > 30 U/ml, respectively (p 0.003). Multivariate analysis confirmed preoperative serum CA-125 > 30 U/ml (OR 2.7) and age at diagnosis > 70 years (OR 2.6) as the only independent predictors for overall survival. Conclusion. Pretreatment of CA-125 <= 30 U/ml dominates over histologic cell type, substage and grade to identify a subgroup of FIGO stage I patients with a genuinely good prognosis with extremely good survival and who could possibly be spared with adjuvant chemotherapy. (c) 2006 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:607 / 611
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] SURGICAL STAGING OF OVARIAN CANCER ( I FIGO STAGE)
    Ismail, E.
    Kornovski, Y.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2015, 25 : 52 - 52
  • [22] Prognostic implications of the new FIGO classification (stage IIIC)
    Dangi, Uma
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2023, 60 (02) : 256 - 257
  • [23] A RETROSPECTIVE STUDY OF ADJUVANT CHEMOTHERAPY PLUS PELVIC RADIOTHERAPY IN FIGO STAGE II EPITHELIAL OVARIAN CANCER
    Chamoun, J.
    Au-Yeng, G.
    te Marvelde, L.
    Quinn, M.
    Grant, P.
    McNally, O.
    Narayan, K.
    Rischin, D.
    Neesham, D.
    Allen, D.
    Hyde, S.
    Bernshaw, D.
    Khaw, P.
    Mileshkin, L.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2014, 24 (09) : 175 - 176
  • [24] Reflections on the FIGO surgical staging of invasive epithelial ovarian cancer
    Menczer, J
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF GYNAECOLOGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2003, 24 (3-4) : 215 - 222
  • [25] Simplified staging laparotomy in FIGO stage 1 epithelial ovarian cancer: Follow-up and outcomes in South Wales, UK
    Beena, A.
    Howells, R.
    Lutchman-Singh, K.
    Dhar, K.
    Lim, K.
    Jones, R.
    Hudson, E.
    Bertelli, G.
    JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2013, 33 (08) : 888 - 891
  • [26] The FIGO Stage IVA Versus IVB of Ovarian Cancer: Prognostic Value and Predictive Value for Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy
    Tajik, Parvin
    van de Vrie, Roelien
    Zafarmand, Mohammad H.
    Coens, Corneel
    Buist, Marrije R.
    Vergote, Ignace
    Bossuyt, Patrick M. M.
    Kenter, Gemma G.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2018, 28 (03) : 453 - 458
  • [27] A prognostic regulatory pathway in stage I epithelial ovarian cancer: new hints for the poor prognosis assessment
    Calura, E.
    Paracchini, L.
    Fruscio, R.
    DiFeo, A.
    Ravaggi, A.
    Peronne, J.
    Martini, P.
    Sales, G.
    Beltrame, L.
    Bignotti, E.
    Tognon, G.
    Milani, R.
    Clivio, L.
    Dell'Anna, T.
    Cattoretti, G.
    Katsaros, D.
    Sartori, E.
    Mangioni, C.
    Ardighieri, L.
    D'Incalci, M.
    Marchini, S.
    Romualdi, C.
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2016, 27 (08) : 1511 - 1519
  • [28] Prognostic Relevance of Uncommon Ovarian Histology in Women With Stage III/IV Epithelial Ovarian Cancer
    Mackay, Helen J.
    Brady, Mark F.
    Oza, Amit M.
    Reuss, Alexander
    Pujade-Lauraine, Eric
    Swart, Ann M.
    Siddiqui, Nadeem
    Colombo, Nicoletta
    Bookman, Michael A.
    Pfisterer, Jacobus
    du Bois, Andreas
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2010, 20 (06) : 945 - 952
  • [29] Laparoscopy versus laparotomy for FIGO stage I ovarian cancer
    Lawrie, Theresa A.
    Medeiros, Lidia R. F.
    Rosa, Daniela D.
    da Rosa, Maria Ines
    Edelweiss, Maria I.
    Stein, Airton T.
    Zelmanowicz, Alice
    Ethur, Anaelena B.
    Zanini, Roselaine R.
    COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2013, (02):
  • [30] Laparoscopy versus laparotomy for FIGO stage I ovarian cancer
    Falcetta, Frederico S.
    Lawrie, Theresa A.
    Medeiros, Lidia R. F.
    da Rosa, Maria Ines
    Edelweiss, Maria I.
    Stein, Airton T.
    Zelmanowicz, Alice
    Moraes, Anaelena B.
    Zanini, Roselaine R.
    Rosa, Daniela D.
    COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2016, (10):