Early decision-making for school building renovation

被引:10
|
作者
Farsater, Karin [1 ]
Olander, Stefan [2 ]
机构
[1] Lund Univ, Dept Engn, Lund, Sweden
[2] Lund Univ, Dept Construct Management, Lund, Sweden
基金
瑞典研究理事会;
关键词
Facility management; Property management; Building evaluation; Refurbishment; Sustainable buildings; Learning environments; DESIGN;
D O I
10.1108/F-10-2017-0102
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Purpose The purpose of this study was to evaluate how decisions are taken in the early stages of a renovation project, up to the design brief, leading up to the decisions on how to proceed with the renovation in the design phase. Although many technical solutions are visualised in the design phase, it is in the early evaluations of needs and demands, leading up to the design brief, that set the requirements for viable solutions in the design and production phases. Design/methodology/approach The study was carried out as a longitudinal case study of the planning phases of a school renovation. The studied buildings were researched by document analysis and by attending meetings over a four-year period between the building owners and the municipality. Findings Aspects such as technical status, energy use and indoor environment in the buildings were not discussed to any great extent. A few inventories were carried out in the buildings to establish their technical and accessibility status. The aspects mainly discussed in the studied renovation project have been: accessibility, functionality with respect to teaching and learning requirements in addition to architectural and cultural values. Originality/value This study illustrates the comprehensive analysis needed when renovating a building and on difficulties of addressing and evaluating all the viable aspects of concern. It also shows that this planning for a renovation is not a straight line but rather a process where conditions are continuously changing.
引用
收藏
页码:981 / 994
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Shared Decision-Making Is Not Patient Decision-Making
    Birnbrich, Alysa
    McCulloch, Patrick C.
    Kraeutler, Matthew J.
    [J]. SPORTS HEALTH-A MULTIDISCIPLINARY APPROACH, 2023, 15 (04): : 615 - 616
  • [32] Trial management– building the evidence base for decision-making
    Shaun Treweek
    Roberta Littleford
    [J]. Trials, 19
  • [33] A Decision-Making Process for Selecting Building Envelope Assemblies
    Deniz, Omer S.
    Ekinci, Savas
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ASIAN ARCHITECTURE AND BUILDING ENGINEERING, 2016, 15 (03) : 549 - 555
  • [34] Building Information Modeling for Participatory Decision-making Processes
    da Costa Pita, Juliano Veraldo
    Tramontano, Marcelo Claudio
    [J]. ECAADE SIGRADI 2019: ARCHITECTURE IN THE AGE OF THE 4TH INDUSTRIAL REVOLUTION, VOL 1, 2019, : 283 - 292
  • [35] How Occupants Affect Building Operators' Decision-Making
    Afroz, Zakia
    Hobson, Brodie W.
    Gunay, H. Burak
    O'Brien, William
    Kane, Michael
    [J]. ASHRAE JOURNAL, 2020, 62 (11) : 22 - 30
  • [36] An optimization framework for building energy retrofits decision-making
    Jafari, Amirhosein
    Valentin, Vanessa
    [J]. BUILDING AND ENVIRONMENT, 2017, 115 : 118 - 129
  • [37] A Decision-Making Perspective for Designing and Building Information Systems
    Filip, F. G.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTERS COMMUNICATIONS & CONTROL, 2012, 7 (02) : 264 - 272
  • [38] The impact of clients' decision-making on their adoption of industrialized building
    Hedgren, Erika
    Stehn, Lars
    [J]. CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT AND ECONOMICS, 2014, 32 (1-2) : 126 - 145
  • [39] How occupants affect building operators' decision-making
    Afroz, Zakia
    Hobson, Brodie W.
    Burak Gunay, H.
    O'Brien, William
    Kane, Michael
    [J]. ASHRAE Journal, 2020, 62 (11): : 22 - 30
  • [40] The Building of a Dam: Value Conflicts in Public Decision-Making
    Costa, Ana
    Caldas, Jose Castro
    Coelho, Ricardo
    Ferreiro, Maria de Fatima
    Goncalves, Vasco
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL VALUES, 2016, 25 (02) : 215 - 234