Surgical outcomes of posterior lumbar interbody fusion in elderly patients

被引:165
|
作者
Okuda, Shinya [1 ]
Oda, Takenori [1 ]
Miyauchi, Akira [1 ]
Haku, Takamitsu [1 ]
Yamamoto, Tomio [1 ]
Iwasaki, Motoki [1 ]
机构
[1] Osaka Rosai Hosp, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Osaka 5918025, Japan
来源
关键词
ADJACENT-SEGMENT DEGENERATION; PEDICLE SCREW FIXATION; SPINAL-FUSION; RISK-FACTORS; END-PLATE; FOLLOW-UP; COMPLICATIONS; CAGE; SPONDYLOLISTHESIS; INSTRUMENTATION;
D O I
10.2106/JBJS.F.00186
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: We are aware of no reports on the surgical results of posterior lumbar interbody fusion in elderly patients. The purpose of this study was to investigate the clinical and radiographic results of posterior lumbar interbody fusion with pedicle screws in patients older than seventy years of age and compare them with results in younger patients. We also investigated the association between the clinical and radiographic results. Methods: The study included 101 patients who had been followed for at least three years after posterior lumbar interbody fusion with pedicle screws for the treatment of L4-L5 degenerative spondylolisthesis. The average follow-up period was fifty months. The patients were divided into two groups according to their age at the time of the operation: Group 1 included thirty-one patients who were seventy years of age or older (average age, seventy-four years) at the time of the operation, and Group 2 included seventy patients who were less than seventy years old (average age, fifty-nine years). Preoperative and postoperative status (according to the Japanese Orthopaedic Association scoring system) and postoperative complications were compared between the two groups. Postoperative radiographic features, including fusion status and segmental lordosis, were also examined. Results: No significant differences in preoperative and postoperative scores were observed between the two age groups, with the numbers available. General complications were found in Group 1. However, the prevalence of adjacent segment degeneration in Group 1 was lower than that in Group 2. The radiographic results revealed no significant difference in the prevalence of segmental lordosis, with the numbers available. There was no nonunion in either group. Although the prevalence of either collapsed union or delayed union in Group 1 was significantly higher than that in Group 2 (p = 0.034), the fusion results such as union in situ, collapsed union, and delayed union did not appear to affect the postoperative clinical results in this study. Conclusions: No obvious differences in the clinical results were observed between the age groups with the numbers available. Postoperative adjacent segment degeneration was less frequent and collapsed union and delayed union were more common in the elderly group. The fusion results did not appear to affect the postoperative clinical results in this study.
引用
收藏
页码:2714 / 2720
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Posterior lumbar interbody fusion for aged patients with degenerative spondylolisthesis: is intentional surgical reduction essential?
    Lian, Xiao-Feng
    Hou, Tie-Sheng
    Xu, Jian-Guang
    Zeng, Bing-Fang
    Zhao, Jie
    Liu, Xiao-Kang
    Zhao, Cheng
    Li, Hao
    SPINE JOURNAL, 2013, 13 (10): : 1183 - 1189
  • [42] Salvage Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Pseudoarthrosis After Posterior or Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Review of 10 Patients
    Yun, Dong-Ju
    Yu, Jae-Won
    Jeon, Sang-Hyeop
    Lee, Hyung-Chang
    Lee, Sang-Ho
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2018, 111 : E746 - E755
  • [43] A Comparative Study of Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis
    Pawar, Abhijit Y.
    Hughes, Alexander P.
    Sama, Andrew A.
    Girardi, Federico P.
    Lebl, Darren R.
    Cammisa, Frank P.
    ASIAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2015, 9 (05) : 668 - 674
  • [44] POSTERIOR LUMBAR INTERBODY FUSION - INDICATIONS AND RESULTS IN 70 PATIENTS
    BRIGHTMAN, RP
    MILLER, CA
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY, 1989, 70 (02) : A315 - A315
  • [45] Lumbar spinal fusions: A retrospective comparision of combined anterior/posterior fusion, posterior lumbar interbody fusion, and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.
    Wu, JA
    Laiwalla, UZ
    Wang, JC
    JOURNAL OF INVESTIGATIVE MEDICINE, 2006, 54 (01) : S117 - S117
  • [46] Posterior lumbar interbody fusion and segmental lumbar lordosis
    Kakkar, Rahul
    Sirigiri, P. B. R.
    Howieson, A.
    Raman, A. Siva
    Crawford, R. J.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY AND TRAUMATOLOGY, 2007, 17 (02): : 125 - 129
  • [47] Fusion Rate and Clinical Outcomes in Two-Level Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion
    Aono, Hiroyuki
    Takenaka, Shota
    Nagamoto, Yukitaka
    Tobimatsu, Hidekazu
    Yamashita, Tomoya
    Furuya, Masayuki
    Iwasaki, Motoki
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2018, 112 : E473 - E478
  • [48] Comparison of decompression only versus posterior lumbar interbody fusion for lumbar nerve root canal stenosis in elderly patients
    Duan, Chunyue
    Hu, Jianzhong
    Cao, Yong
    Wang, Xiyang
    Wu, Jianhuang
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE, 2016, 9 (08): : 16491 - 16497
  • [49] Perioperative outcomes and adverse events of minimally invasive surgery during transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion/posterior lumbar interbody fusion Response
    Goldstein, Christina L.
    Rampersaud, Y. Raja
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2016, 24 (03) : 414 - 415
  • [50] Surgical Treatment of Lumbar Tuberculous Spondylodiscitis by Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (TLIF) and Posterior Instrumentation
    Zaveri, Gautam R.
    Mehta, Satyen S.
    JOURNAL OF SPINAL DISORDERS & TECHNIQUES, 2009, 22 (04): : 257 - 262