Surgical outcomes of posterior lumbar interbody fusion in elderly patients

被引:165
|
作者
Okuda, Shinya [1 ]
Oda, Takenori [1 ]
Miyauchi, Akira [1 ]
Haku, Takamitsu [1 ]
Yamamoto, Tomio [1 ]
Iwasaki, Motoki [1 ]
机构
[1] Osaka Rosai Hosp, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Osaka 5918025, Japan
来源
关键词
ADJACENT-SEGMENT DEGENERATION; PEDICLE SCREW FIXATION; SPINAL-FUSION; RISK-FACTORS; END-PLATE; FOLLOW-UP; COMPLICATIONS; CAGE; SPONDYLOLISTHESIS; INSTRUMENTATION;
D O I
10.2106/JBJS.F.00186
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: We are aware of no reports on the surgical results of posterior lumbar interbody fusion in elderly patients. The purpose of this study was to investigate the clinical and radiographic results of posterior lumbar interbody fusion with pedicle screws in patients older than seventy years of age and compare them with results in younger patients. We also investigated the association between the clinical and radiographic results. Methods: The study included 101 patients who had been followed for at least three years after posterior lumbar interbody fusion with pedicle screws for the treatment of L4-L5 degenerative spondylolisthesis. The average follow-up period was fifty months. The patients were divided into two groups according to their age at the time of the operation: Group 1 included thirty-one patients who were seventy years of age or older (average age, seventy-four years) at the time of the operation, and Group 2 included seventy patients who were less than seventy years old (average age, fifty-nine years). Preoperative and postoperative status (according to the Japanese Orthopaedic Association scoring system) and postoperative complications were compared between the two groups. Postoperative radiographic features, including fusion status and segmental lordosis, were also examined. Results: No significant differences in preoperative and postoperative scores were observed between the two age groups, with the numbers available. General complications were found in Group 1. However, the prevalence of adjacent segment degeneration in Group 1 was lower than that in Group 2. The radiographic results revealed no significant difference in the prevalence of segmental lordosis, with the numbers available. There was no nonunion in either group. Although the prevalence of either collapsed union or delayed union in Group 1 was significantly higher than that in Group 2 (p = 0.034), the fusion results such as union in situ, collapsed union, and delayed union did not appear to affect the postoperative clinical results in this study. Conclusions: No obvious differences in the clinical results were observed between the age groups with the numbers available. Postoperative adjacent segment degeneration was less frequent and collapsed union and delayed union were more common in the elderly group. The fusion results did not appear to affect the postoperative clinical results in this study.
引用
收藏
页码:2714 / 2720
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Surgical outcomes of additional posterior lumbar interbody fusion for adjacent segment disease after single-level posterior lumbar interbody fusion
    Toshitada Miwa
    Hironobu Sakaura
    Tomoya Yamashita
    Shozo Suzuki
    Tetsuo Ohwada
    European Spine Journal, 2013, 22 : 2864 - 2868
  • [2] Surgical outcomes of additional posterior lumbar interbody fusion for adjacent segment disease after single-level posterior lumbar interbody fusion
    Miwa, Toshitada
    Sakaura, Hironobu
    Yamashita, Tomoya
    Suzuki, Shozo
    Ohwada, Tetsuo
    EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2013, 22 (12) : 2864 - 2868
  • [3] Surgical outcomes of anterior lumbar interbody fusion in revision lumbar interbody fusion surgery
    Cheng-Min Shih
    Cheng-En Hsu
    Kun-Hui Chen
    Chien-Chou Pan
    Cheng-Hung Lee
    Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, 18
  • [4] Surgical outcomes of anterior lumbar interbody fusion in revision lumbar interbody fusion surgery
    Shih, Cheng-Min
    Hsu, Cheng-En
    Chen, Kun-Hui
    Pan, Chien-Chou
    Lee, Cheng-Hung
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY AND RESEARCH, 2023, 18 (01)
  • [5] Posterior lumbar interbody fusion and posterior instrumentation in the surgical management of lumbar tuberculous spondylitis
    Lee, J. S.
    Moon, K. P.
    Kim, S. J.
    Suh, K. T.
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 2007, 89B (02): : 210 - 214
  • [6] Surgical complications of posterior lumbar interbody fusion with total facetectomy in 251 patients
    Okuda, S
    Miyauchi, A
    Oda, T
    Haku, T
    Yamamoto, T
    Iwasaki, M
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2006, 4 (04) : 304 - 309
  • [7] Clinical Outcomes of Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Lumbar Foraminal Stenosis Preoperative Diagnosis and Surgical Strategy
    Watanabe, Kei
    Yamazaki, Akiyoshi
    Morita, Osamu
    Sano, Atsuki
    Katsumi, Keiichi
    Ohashi, Masayuki
    JOURNAL OF SPINAL DISORDERS & TECHNIQUES, 2011, 24 (03): : 137 - 141
  • [8] POSTERIOR LUMBAR INTERBODY FUSION
    JACKSON, JD
    SOUTHERN MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1987, 80 (09) : 31 - 31
  • [9] POSTERIOR LUMBAR INTERBODY FUSION
    LIN, PM
    CAUTILLI, RA
    JOYCE, MF
    CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 1983, (180) : 154 - 168
  • [10] Posterior lumbar interbody fusion
    Clavel-Escribano, M
    Robles-Balibrea, A
    Clavel-Laria, P
    Robles-Cano, V
    Puertas-García-Sandoval, P
    Laria-Fernández, C
    NEUROCIRUGIA, 2001, 12 (05): : 447 - 455