On the toe stability of rubble mound structures

被引:6
|
作者
Etemad-Shahidi, Amir [1 ,2 ]
Bali, Meysam [3 ]
van Gent, Marcel R. A. [4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Griffith Univ, Sch Engn & Built Environm, Brisbane, Qld 4222, Australia
[2] Edith Cowan Univ, Sch Engn, Joondalup, WA 6027, Australia
[3] Pouya Tarh Pars Consulting Co, Tehran, Iran
[4] Deltares, Dept Coastal Struct & Waves, Delft, Netherlands
[5] Delft Univ Technol, Dept Hydraul Engn, Delft, Netherlands
关键词
Toe berm design; Breakwaters; Rock; Scour protection; Physical model tests; Design formula;
D O I
10.1016/j.coastaleng.2020.103835
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Toe design is an important task for coastal engineers as it ensures the stability of the main armor layer and prevents scour in front of the armor slope. Several laboratory experiments have been conducted to investigate the toe stability using different testing approaches, i.e. damage due to a single test condition and cumulative damage due to a number of conditions. In addition, the methods of measuring and reporting damage to the toe are not the same as some researchers have counted only stones that were washed away from the toe; while others counted all the stones that have been displaced. Several formulas with different levels of success have been developed based on these studies. However, the scatter in the results is large and effects of some parameters are disregarded. The aims of this study are (a) to briefly review the abovementioned differences and exiting formulas, and (b) to develop a and physically sound formula for common design conditions, which considers the effect of all governing parameters. To achieve this, first a comprehensive data base from existing reliable studies was collected. Then nondimensional parameters which capture effects of governing parameters such as wave height, wave period, water depth, toe depth, toe width and foreshore slopes were deployed to develop a stability formula using physical reasoning and regression analysis. The new formula outperforms existing formulae for toe stability. The coefficient of variation of the formula was also determined to be used for probabilistic design applications. Finally, some design hints are provided for practitioners.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Stability Analysis of Rubble Mound Breakwaters Under Tsunami Overflow
    National Institute of Technology Karnataka, Karnataka, Surathkal, India
    Lect. Notes Civ. Eng., (247-254):
  • [32] ARMOR LAYER STABILITY OF RUBBLE-MOUND BREAKWATERS - DISCUSSION
    HEDAR, A
    JOURNAL OF WATERWAY PORT COASTAL AND OCEAN ENGINEERING-ASCE, 1988, 114 (03): : 391 - 391
  • [33] The beneficial role of rubble mound coastal structures on seawater oxygenation
    Daniil, EI
    Tsoukala, VK
    Moutzouris, CI
    ANNALES GEOPHYSICAE-ATMOSPHERES HYDROSPHERES AND SPACE SCIENCES, 2000, 18 (10): : 1360 - 1371
  • [34] Stability Analysis of Rubble Mound Breakwaters Under Tsunami Overflow
    Sajan, Manu K.
    Chaudhary, Babloo
    Akarsh, P. K.
    Kumar, Subodh
    GEO-SUSTAINNOVATION FOR RESILIENT SOCIETY, CREST 2023, 2024, 446 : 247 - 254
  • [35] Fuzzy logic approach to conventional rubble mound structures design
    Erdik, Tarkan
    EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2009, 36 (03) : 4162 - 4170
  • [36] Stability analysis of rubble mound breakwater by discrete element method
    Li, Zeng-Zhi
    Bie, She-An
    Ren, Zeng-Jin
    Gongcheng Lixue/Engineering Mechanics, 2009, 26 (SUPPL. 1): : 111 - 114
  • [37] Wave-induced mean flows in vertical rubble mound structures
    Losada, IJ
    Dalrymple, RA
    Losada, MA
    COASTAL ENGINEERING, 1998, 35 (04) : 251 - 281
  • [38] STABILITY OF RUBBLE-MOUND BREAKWATER LAHAINA HARBOR, HAWAII.
    Carver, Robert D.
    1600,
  • [39] Stability of low-crested rubble-mound breakwater heads
    Vidal, Cesar
    Losada, Miguel A.
    Mansard, Etienne P.D.
    Journal of Waterway, Port, Coastal and Ocean Engineering, 1995, 121 (02): : 114 - 122
  • [40] Three-dimensional investigations of wave overtopping on rubble mound structures
    Andersen, T. Lykke
    Burcharth, H. F.
    COASTAL ENGINEERING, 2009, 56 (02) : 180 - 189