SYNCHRONOUS PENOSCROTAL IMPLANTATION OF PENILE PROSTHESIS AND ARTIFICIAL URINARY SPHINCTER AFTER RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY

被引:0
|
作者
Bolat, Deniz [1 ]
Kozacioglu, Zafer [2 ]
Polat, Salih [1 ]
Koras, Omer [3 ]
Arslan, Murat [4 ]
Minareci, Suleyman [1 ]
机构
[1] Bozyaka Training & Res Hosp, Dept Urol, Izmir, Turkey
[2] Tepecik Training & Res Hosp, Dept Urol, Izmir, Turkey
[3] Mustafakemalpasa State Hosp, Dept Urol, Bursa, Turkey
[4] Izmir Univ, Dept Urol, Fac Med, Izmir, Turkey
来源
ARCHIVOS ESPANOLES DE UROLOGIA | 2017年 / 70卷 / 03期
关键词
Dual implants; Penile prosthesis; Artificial urinary sphincter; Erectile dysfunction; Urinary Incontinence; Radical prostatectomy; TRANS-SCROTAL INCISION; INFLATABLE PENILE; DUAL IMPLANTATION; ERECTILE DYSFUNCTION; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; INCONTINENCE; SINGLE; METAANALYSIS; DEVICE;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the results of synchronous dual implantation of penile (PP) and artificial urinary sphincter prosthesis (AUSP) in patients with severe erectile dysfunction (ED) and urinary incontinence (UI) after radical prostatectomy (RP). METHODS: Between January 2006 and March 2015, patients who underwent synchronous dual implantation of PP for severe post-RP ED and AUSP for moderate to severe post-RP UI in our clinic were screened retrospectively. The erectile function and the continence status were evaluated by the questionnaires of IIEF-5 and ICIO-SF. Results for the preoperative period and for the 1st postoperative year were revealed from patient charts. Long term results were evaluated by telephone interviews. Comorbidities, infection rates and complications were noted. RESULTS: A total of 14 patients underwent synchronous dual implantation; out of which, 71 had a long enough follow up period for a sufficient long term evaluation. 3/11 had MPP and 8/11 had two-piece IPP implantation together with an AUSP. All of the implantations were carried out through an upper transverse scrotal incision. Mean follow up time was 61.3 20 months. In 1 patient who had received adjuvant radiotherapy, both of the devices were removed due to infection and cuff erosion. Mean daily usage of pads diminished from 4 to 7 while ICIO-SF score decreased from 19 to 2 and IIEF-5 score increased from 3 to 23. CONCLUSION: Synchronous implantation of PP and AUSP is a safe and effective treatment option for patients with severe ED and moderate to severe UI after RP
引用
收藏
页码:367 / 372
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Impotence after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer: Results of penile prosthesis implantation
    Menard, J.
    Tremeaux, J. C.
    Faix, A.
    Staerman, F.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY SUPPLEMENTS, 2007, 6 (02) : 208 - 208
  • [22] The artificial urinary sphincter as treatment option for urinary incontinence after radical prostatectomy
    Fisch, M
    Olianas, R
    Heitz, M
    Schreiter, F
    AKTUELLE UROLOGIE, 2002, 33 (05) : 351 - 356
  • [23] Synchronous Artificial Urinary Sphincter and Inflatable Penile Prosthesis Implantation: Short-Term Outcomes from a Statewide Claims Database
    Sweigert, Sarah E.
    Chuang, Eric
    Patel, Parth M.
    Kirshenbaum, Eric
    Nelson, Marc
    Bajic, Petar
    McVary, Kevin T.
    Farooq, Ahmer
    Gonzalez, Christopher
    UROLOGY PRACTICE, 2021, 8 (05) : 565 - 570
  • [24] PENOSCROTAL INCISION FOR PRIMARY IMPLANTATION OF AMS 800 ARTIFICIAL URINARY SPHINCTER
    Jamaer, C.
    de Bruyn, H.
    van Renterghem, A.
    Baten, E.
    van Renterghem, K.
    JOURNAL OF SEXUAL MEDICINE, 2019, 16 (05): : S22 - S22
  • [25] Comparison of penoscrotal and perineal approaches for implantation of an artificial urinary sphincter in man
    Brierre, T.
    Roumiguie, M.
    Soulie, M.
    Rischmann, P.
    Thoulouzan, M.
    Game, X.
    PROGRES EN UROLOGIE, 2021, 31 (17): : 1182 - 1191
  • [26] Penoscrotal approach for artificial urinary sphincter implantation is not inferior to perineal approach
    Shen, Yuan-Chi
    Chiang, Po-Hui
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2010, 17 : A189 - A190
  • [27] Artificial Urinary Sphincter placement after radical prostatectomy; a national perspective
    Burke, M. J.
    Nason, G. J.
    Redmond, E.
    Aslam, A.
    Kelly, N. P.
    Akram, C. M.
    Giri, S. K.
    Flood, H. D.
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2014, 114 : 32 - 33
  • [28] ARTIFICIAL URINARY SPHINCTER: THE PENOSCROTAL APPROACH
    Perrouin-Verbe, Marie-Aimee
    Deruelle, Charles
    Valeri, Antoine
    Joulin, Vincent
    Papin, Gregory
    Rousseau, Benoit
    Erauso, Antoine
    Fournier, Georges
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2009, 181 (04): : 130 - 131
  • [29] Radical prostatectomy and simultaneous penile prosthesis implantation: a narrative review
    Cocci, Andrea
    Cito, Gianmartin
    Romano, Andrea
    Largana, Gaetano
    Vignolini, Graziano
    Minervini, Andrea
    Di Maida, Fabrizio
    Campi, Riccardo
    Carini, Marco
    Mondaini, Nicola
    Russo, Giorgio Ivan
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF IMPOTENCE RESEARCH, 2020, 32 (03) : 274 - 280
  • [30] Radical prostatectomy and simultaneous penile prosthesis implantation: a narrative review
    Andrea Cocci
    Gianmartin Cito
    Andrea Romano
    Gaetano Larganà
    Graziano Vignolini
    Andrea Minervini
    Fabrizio Di Maida
    Riccardo Campi
    Marco Carini
    Nicola Mondaini
    Giorgio Ivan Russo
    International Journal of Impotence Research, 2020, 32 : 274 - 280