Thermodynamic and Structural Effects of Conformational Constraints in Protein-Ligand Interactions. Entropic Paradoxy Associated with Ligand Preorganization

被引:112
|
作者
DeLorbe, John E.
Clements, John H.
Teresk, Martin G.
Benfield, Aaron P.
Plake, Hilary R.
Millspaugh, Laura E.
Martin, Stephen F. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas Austin, Dept Chem & Biochem, Inst Cellular & Mol Biol, Austin, TX 78712 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院; 美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
STRUCTURE-BASED DESIGN; SRC SH2 DOMAIN; CYCLOPROPANE-DERIVED PEPTIDOMIMETICS; RESTRICTED PEPTIDE ISOSTERES; HIGH-AFFINITY; FREE-ENERGY; 1,2,3-TRISUBSTITUTED CYCLOPROPANES; MACROCYCLIC INHIBITORS; HOST-GUEST; ENTHALPY COMPENSATION;
D O I
10.1021/ja904698q
中图分类号
O6 [化学];
学科分类号
0703 ;
摘要
Succinate- and cyclopropane-derived phosphotyrosine (pY) replacements were incorporated into a series of Grb2 SH2 binding ligands wherein the pY+1 residue was varied to determine explicitly how variations in ligand preorganization affect binding energetics and structure. The complexes of these ligands with the Grb2 SH2 domain were examined in a series of thermodynamic and structural investigations using isothermal titration calorimetry and X-ray crystallography. The binding enthalpies for all ligands were favorable, and although binding entropies for all ligands having a hydrophobic residue at the pY+1 site were favorable, binding entropies for those having a hydrophilic residue at this site were unfavorable. Preorganized ligands generally bound with more favorable Gibbs energies than their flexible controls, but this increased affinity was the consequence of relatively more favorable binding enthalpies. Unexpectedly, binding entropies of the constrained ligands were uniformly disfavored relative to their flexible controls, demonstrating that the widely held belief that ligand preorganization should result in an entropic advantage is not necessarily true. Crystallographic studies of complexes of several flexible and constrained ligands having the same amino acid at the pY+1 position revealed extensive similarities, but there were some notable differences. There are a greater number of direct polar contacts in complexes of the constrained ligands that correlate qualitatively with their more favorable binding enthalpies and Gibbs energies. There are more single water-mediated contacts between the domain and the flexible ligand of each pair; although fixing water molecules at a protein-ligand interface is commonly viewed as entropically unfavorable, entropies for forming these complexes are favored relative to those of their constrained counterparts. Crystallographic b-factors in the complexes of constrained ligands are greater than those of their flexible counterparts, an observation that seems inconsistent with our finding that entropies for forming complexes of flexible ligands are relatively more favorable. This systematic study highlights the profound challenges and complexities associated with predicting how structural changes in a ligand will affect enthalpies, entropies, and structure in protein-ligand interactions.
引用
收藏
页码:16758 / 16770
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Simple knowledge-based descriptors to predict protein-ligand interactions. Methodology and validation
    Nissink, JWM
    Verdonk, ML
    Klebe, G
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTER-AIDED MOLECULAR DESIGN, 2000, 14 (08) : 787 - 803
  • [32] The effects of active site solvation and protein conformational flexibility on protein-ligand binding
    Friesner, Richard A.
    ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2009, 238
  • [33] A Thermodynamic Comparison of Hydrophobic vs. Hydrophilic Ligand-Protein Interactions.
    Dennis, Caitriona
    Syme, Neil
    Bronowska, Agnieszka
    Homans, Steve
    ACTA CRYSTALLOGRAPHICA A-FOUNDATION AND ADVANCES, 2009, 65 : S152 - S153
  • [34] Quantifying the stabilizing effects of protein-ligand interactions in the gas phase
    Allison, Timothy M.
    Reading, Eamonn
    Liko, Idlir
    Baldwin, Andrew J.
    Laganowsky, Arthur
    Robinson, Carol V.
    NATURE COMMUNICATIONS, 2015, 6
  • [35] NMR-based structural characterization of large protein-ligand interactions
    Maurizio Pellecchia
    David Meininger
    Qing Dong
    Edcon Chang
    Rick Jack
    Daniel S. Sem
    Journal of Biomolecular NMR, 2002, 22 : 165 - 173
  • [36] Molecular recognition by proteins: Protein-ligand interactions from a structural perspective
    Wallace, AC
    Laskowski, RA
    Singh, J
    Thornton, JM
    BIOCHEMICAL SOCIETY TRANSACTIONS, 1996, 24 (01) : 280 - 284
  • [37] NMR-based structural characterization of large protein-ligand interactions
    Pellecchia, M
    Meininger, D
    Dong, Q
    Chang, E
    Jack, R
    Sem, DS
    JOURNAL OF BIOMOLECULAR NMR, 2002, 22 (02) : 165 - 173
  • [38] Label-Free Assay for Thermodynamic Analysis of Protein-Ligand Interactions: A Multivariate Strategy for Allosteric Ligand Screening
    Gavina, Jennilee M. A.
    Mazhab-Jafari, Mohammad T.
    Melacini, Giuseppe
    Britz-McKibbin, Philip
    BIOCHEMISTRY, 2009, 48 (02) : 223 - 225
  • [39] Implicit solvent potentials (scoring functions) for protein-ligand binding and folding with thermodynamic constraints
    Levy, R
    Gallicchio, E
    Felts, A
    Zhang, L
    ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2003, 225 : U779 - U779
  • [40] Ion mobility-mass spectrometry: From proteomics to probing peptide/protein-ligand interactions.
    Russell, DH
    ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2004, 228 : U167 - U167