Application of artificial neural network, multiple linear regression, and response surface regression models in the estimation of monthly rainfall in Northern Cyprus

被引:3
|
作者
Kassem, Youssef [1 ,2 ]
Gokcekus, Huseyin [2 ]
Camur, Huseyin [1 ]
Esenel, Engin [1 ]
机构
[1] Near East Univ, Engn Fac, Dept Mech Engn, Via Mersin 10, TR-99138 Nicosia, Turkey
[2] Near East Univ, Civil & Environm Engn Fac, Dept Mech Engn, Via Mersin 10, TR-99138 Nicosia, Turkey
关键词
ANN; Northern Cyprus; MLR; Monthly rainfall; RSR; SUMMER-MONSOON RAINFALL; WATER-RESOURCES; TIME-SERIES; PREDICTION; INDIA; TEMPERATURE; EFFICIENCY; AUSTRALIA; SELECTION; FORECAST;
D O I
10.5004/dwt.2021.26525
中图分类号
TQ [化学工业];
学科分类号
0817 ;
摘要
Forecasting the rainfall is one of the most important issues in the hydrological cycle. It is very challenging because is still unable to get an ideal model given its uncertain and unexpected variation. Therefore, the study reviewed previous scientific studied from 2000 to 2020 associated with predicting the rainfall in Northern Cyprus and worldwide using machine learning models or mathematical regressions. According to this review, it is evident that the response surface regression (RSR) model has not yet been considered in other studies about monthly rainfall prediction. Consequently, this paper is examined the performance of the RSR for monthly rainfall prediction and compared with the most prominent rainfall artificial model (feed-forward neural network) and multiple linear regression (MLR). In this work, geographical coordinates (latitude (L), longitude (Lo), and altitude (AL) of the location) and meteorological parameters (average temperature (AT), maximum temperature (MaxT), minimum temperature (MinT), and relative humidity (Rh)) are considered as input variables for the models. Rainfall (R) is considered as an output variable for all models. The meteorological data were collected from seven meteorological stations distributed over Northern Cyprus for a short-term period (2011-2017). The coefficient of determination (R-2), root mean squared error (RMSE), Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE), and Willmott's index of agreement (d) were used to select the best predictive model. The results demonstrate that the developed ANN model is superior in predicting the value of monthly rainfall with reported values of 0.631, 33.404, 0.625, and 0.880 for the parameters of R-2, RMSE, NSE, and d, respectively. Additionally, the results indicate that the RSR model gave better represent the relationship between the geographical coordinates, meteorological parameters, and rainfall and produce a better prediction of the monthly rainfall compared to MLR.
引用
收藏
页码:328 / 346
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Efficacy of linear multiple regression and artificial neural network for long-term rainfall forecasting in Western Australia
    Anirban Khastagir
    Iqbal Hossain
    A. H. M. Faisal Anwar
    [J]. Meteorology and Atmospheric Physics, 2022, 134
  • [12] Artificial Neural Networks and Multiple Linear Regression for Filling in Missing Daily Rainfall Data
    Papailiou, Ioannis
    Spyropoulos, Fotios
    Trichakis, Ioannis
    Karatzas, George P.
    [J]. WATER, 2022, 14 (18)
  • [13] Secchi Disk Depth Estimation from Water Quality Parameters: Artificial Neural Network versus Multiple Linear Regression Models?
    Heddam S.
    [J]. Environmental Processes, 2016, 3 (2) : 525 - 536
  • [14] Estimation of surface shear strength in Zagros region of Iran - A comparison of artificial neural networks and multiple-linear regression models
    Khalilmoghadam, B.
    Afyuni, M.
    Abbaspour, K. C.
    Jalalian, A.
    Dehghani, A. A.
    Schulin, R.
    [J]. GEODERMA, 2009, 153 (1-2) : 29 - 36
  • [15] The estimation of monthly mean significant wave heights by using artificial neural network and regression methods
    Gunaydin, Kemal
    [J]. OCEAN ENGINEERING, 2008, 35 (14-15) : 1406 - 1415
  • [16] Estimating Evapotranspiration of Screenhouse Banana Plantations Using Artificial Neural Network and Multiple Linear Regression Models
    Yohanani, Efi
    Frisch, Amit
    Lukyanov, Victor
    Cohen, Shabtai
    Teitel, Meir
    Tanny, Josef
    [J]. WATER, 2022, 14 (07)
  • [17] Comparison of Multiple Linear Regression and Artificial Neural Network Models Goodness of Fit to Lactation Milk Yields
    Takma, Cigdem
    Atil, Hulya
    Aksakal, Vecihi
    [J]. KAFKAS UNIVERSITESI VETERINER FAKULTESI DERGISI, 2012, 18 (06) : 941 - 944
  • [18] The Application of Multiple Linear Regression and Artificial Neural Network Models for Yield Prediction of Very Early Potato Cultivars before Harvest
    Piekutowska, Magdalena
    Niedbala, Gniewko
    Piskier, Tomasz
    Lenartowicz, Tomasz
    Pilarski, Krzysztof
    Wojciechowski, Tomasz
    Pilarska, Agnieszka A.
    Czechowska-Kosacka, Aneta
    [J]. AGRONOMY-BASEL, 2021, 11 (05):
  • [19] Comparison of regression and artificial neural network models for estimation of global solar radiations
    Kumar, Rajesh
    Aggarwal, R. K.
    Sharma, J. D.
    [J]. RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2015, 52 : 1294 - 1299
  • [20] Multi stage wheat yield estimation using multiple linear, neural network and penalised regression models
    Aravind, K. S.
    Das, Ananta Vashisth B.
    Krishanan, P.
    [J]. MAUSAM, 2023, 74 (03): : 833 - 846