Estimating PM2.5 from multisource data: A comparison of different machine learning models in the Pearl River Delta of China

被引:33
|
作者
Tian, Hao [1 ,2 ]
Zhao, Yongquan [3 ]
Luo, Ming [1 ,2 ,4 ]
He, Qingqing [4 ]
Han, Yu [1 ,2 ]
Zeng, Zhaoliang [5 ]
机构
[1] Sun Yat Sen Univ, Sch Geog & Planning, Guangzhou, Peoples R China
[2] Sun Yat Sen Univ, Guangdong Key Lab Urbanizat & Geosimulat, Guangzhou, Peoples R China
[3] Ohio State Univ, Dept Geog, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
[4] Chinese Univ Hong Kong, Inst Environm Energy & Sustainabil, Sha Tin, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[5] Wuhan Univ, Chinese Antarctic Ctr Surveying & Mapping, Wuhan, Peoples R China
基金
国家重点研发计划; 中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
PM2.5; Air pollution; Machine learning; Pearl River Delta; Point of Interest (POI); AIR-QUALITY; PARTICULATE MATTER; REGION; POLLUTION; PREDICTION; CHEMISTRY; IMPACTS; URBAN; NO2;
D O I
10.1016/j.uclim.2020.100740
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Air pollution with high concentrations of fine particulate matter (PM2.5) poses severe threats to human health. Accurate estimation of PM2.5 concentrations can timely assist relevant agencies to conduct air pollution treatment and provide essential data sources for epidemiological research related to PM2.5 exposure. Although China has established a network for monitoring ground-level PM2.5 concentrations over the past decades, the limited available records from the sparsely located PM2.5 monitoring sites hinder the fine-resolution research of air pollution. Many studies have been conducted to fill the data gap caused by sparsely distributed monitoring sites, but the accuracy of different models varies greatly. In recent years, machine learning models have become the preferred choices due to their high estimation accuracy. However, the estimation accuracy may differ significantly in different study areas with different models, and there are few studies on model performance evaluation regarding the Pearl River Delta (PRD) region of China. This study evaluated the performance of six machine learning models for estimating PM2.5 concentrations in PRD from August 2014 to December 2019. Moreover, multi-source data were adopted for reliable daily PM2.5 concentration estimation, including meteorology, vegetation, topography, and point of interest (POI). The results show that the tree-structured models (i.e., Random Forest (RF) and Gradient Boosting Regression Tree (GBRT)) generally produce better estimations than other models. Two neural network models (i.e., Back Propagation Neural Network (BPNN) and Elman Neural Network (ENN)) show a similar estimation accuracy. Additionally, the Generalized Additive Model (GAM) generally gives the worst performance, followed by the Support Vector Machines (SVM) model. RF is thus highly recommended based on the estimation accuracy, while GBRT is also a promising model for daily PM2.5 estimation in PRD. Our study provides a reference for selecting an appropriate model for daily PM2.5 concentration estimation in PRD and other regions with climate background.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Compositions and sources of organic acids in fine particles (PM2.5) over the Pearl River Delta region, south China
    Zhao, Xiuying
    Wang, Xinming
    Ding, Xiang
    He, Quanfu
    Zhang, Zhou
    Liu, Tengyu
    Fu, Xiaoxin
    Gao, Bo
    Wang, Yunpeng
    Zhang, Yanli
    Deng, Xuejiao
    Wu, Dui
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES, 2014, 26 (01) : 110 - 121
  • [22] Compositions and sources of organic acids in fine particles(PM2.5) over the Pearl River Delta region, south China
    Xiuying Zhao
    Xinming Wang
    Xiang Ding
    Quanfu He
    Zhou Zhang
    Tengyu Liu
    Xiaoxin Fu
    Bo Gao
    Yunpeng Wang
    Yanli Zhang
    Xuejiao Deng
    Dui Wu
    Journal of Environmental Sciences, 2014, 26 (01) : 110 - 121
  • [23] Acidic gases, ammonia and water-soluble ions in PM2.5 at a coastal site in the Pearl River Delta, China
    Hu, Min
    Wu, Zhijun
    Slanina, J.
    Lin, Peng
    Liu, Shang
    Zeng, Limin
    ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2008, 42 (25) : 6310 - 6320
  • [24] Prediction of PM2.5 and PM10 in Chiang Mai Province: A Comparison of Machine Learning Models
    Thongrod, Thitaporn
    Lim, Apiradee
    Ingviya, Thammasin
    Owusu, Benjamin Atta
    2022 37TH INTERNATIONAL TECHNICAL CONFERENCE ON CIRCUITS/SYSTEMS, COMPUTERS AND COMMUNICATIONS (ITC-CSCC 2022), 2022, : 337 - 340
  • [25] Health benefit assessment of PM2.5 reduction in Pearl River Delta region of China using a model-monitor data fusion approach
    Li, Jiabin
    Zhu, Yun
    Kelly, James T.
    Jang, Carey J.
    Wang, Shuxiao
    Hanna, Adel
    Xing, Jia
    Lin, Che-Jen
    Long, Shicheng
    Yu, Lian
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2019, 233 : 489 - 498
  • [26] PM2.5 Estimation using Machine Learning Models and Satellite Data: A Literature Review
    Unik, Mitra
    Sitanggang, Imas Sukaesih
    Syaufina, Lailan
    Jaya, I. Nengah Surati
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVANCED COMPUTER SCIENCE AND APPLICATIONS, 2023, 14 (05) : 359 - 370
  • [27] Impact of high PM2.5 nitrate on visibility in a medium size city of Pearl River Delta
    Yang, Yihong
    Zhang, Zhisheng
    Yang, Yiling
    Wang, Zhongquan
    Chen, Yan
    He, Huaiwen
    ATMOSPHERIC POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2022, 13 (11)
  • [28] The impacts of comprehensive urbanization on PM2.5 concentrations in the Yangtze River Delta, China
    She, Qiannan
    Cao, Shanshan
    Zhang, Shiqing
    Zhang, Jianpeng
    Zhu, Hongkai
    Bao, Jiehuan
    Meng, Xing
    Liu, Min
    Liu, Yang
    ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2021, 132
  • [29] Relationships of relative humidity with PM2.5 and PM10 in the Yangtze River Delta, China
    Cairong Lou
    Hongyu Liu
    Yufeng Li
    Yan Peng
    Juan Wang
    Lingjun Dai
    Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 2017, 189
  • [30] The Influence of Technological Innovation on PM2.5 Concentration in the Yangtze River Delta, China
    Zhang, Xinlin
    Yang, Zhen
    POLISH JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES, 2023, 32 (04): : 3915 - 3925