Diagnostic Arthroscopy for Detection of Periprosthetic Infection in Painful Shoulder Arthroplasty

被引:18
|
作者
Akguen, Doruk
Maziak, Nina
Plachel, Fabian
Minkus, Marvin
Scheibel, Markus
Perka, Carsten
Moroder, Philipp
机构
[1] Charite Univ Med Berlin, Berlin, Germany
[2] Free Univ Berlin, Berlin, Germany
[3] Humboldt Univ, Berlin, Germany
[4] Berlin Inst Hlth, Ctr Musculoskeletal Surg, Berlin, Germany
关键词
PROPIONIBACTERIUM-ACNES; REVISION; SONICATION; CULTURES; HIP; PERFORMANCE; SURGERY;
D O I
10.1016/j.arthro.2019.03.058
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose: To analyze the utility of arthroscopic biopsies for detection of periprosthetic infection in painful shoulder arthroplasty without objective signs of infection. Methods: A retrospective analysis of all patients who underwent a diagnostic arthroscopy for painful shoulder arthroplasty from June 2012 through July 2018 was performed. Patients with a subsequent revision shoulder arthroplasty after diagnostic arthroscopy were included. Arthroscopic tissue culture results were compared with the culture results of intraoperative tissue samples obtained at the time of open revision surgery. A minimum of 3 tissue samples from synovia and bone-prosthesis interface with signs of synovitis or abnormal appearance was routinely collected. Cases with 2 or more positive cultures for the same microorganism obtained at open revision surgery were considered as true presence of infection. The study protocol was reviewed and approved by the institutional ethics committee. Results: Twenty-three cases in 22 patients were included in this study. Five of these 23 cases were classified as true infection based on the samples obtained during open revision surgery, and 16 cases had a positive culture in diagnostic arthroscopy. Cutibacterium acnes was isolated in each case. Classifying any microbiologic growth in the arthroscopic biopsies as positive resulted in a sensitivity and negative predictive value of 100%, specificity of 39%, and positive predictive value of 31.3% for the detection of a periprosthetic shoulder infection (PPSI). If at least 2 positive samples with the same microbiologic growth in the arthroscopic biopsies were considered as positive, sensitivity and negative predictive value dropped to 80% and 94.4%, respectively, but the specificity and positive predictive value increased to 94.4% and 80%, respectively. Conclusions: Diagnostic arthroscopy is a useful diagnostic tool in patients with suspicion but no clear evidence of PPSI. Arthroscopically obtained tissue biopsies for culture offer a high sensitivity and specificity in the diagnosis of PPSI if at least 2 cultures positive for the same microorganism are considered as infection.
引用
收藏
页码:2571 / 2577
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Periprosthetic shoulder infection: an overview
    Bonnevialle, Nicolas
    Dauzeres, Florence
    Toulemonde, Julien
    Elia, Fanny
    Laffosse, Jean-Michel
    Mansat, Pierre
    EFORT OPEN REVIEWS, 2017, 2 (04): : 104 - 109
  • [32] Evaluation of the Painful Total Shoulder Arthroplasty
    Burrus, M. Tyrrell
    Werner, Brian C.
    Menendez, Mariano E.
    Denard, Patrick J.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGEONS, 2023, 31 (09) : 440 - 449
  • [33] Increased revision rates in shoulder arthroplasty following shoulder arthroscopy
    Sharma, Sribava
    Berger, Peter Z.
    Fassihi, Safa C.
    Gu, Alex
    Stadecker, Monica
    Tarawneh, Omar H.
    Campbell, Joshua C.
    Best, Matthew J.
    Mcfarland, Ed G.
    Srikumaran, Uma
    SHOULDER & ELBOW, 2024, 16 (05) : 501 - 506
  • [34] Periprosthetic Humeral Fractures During Shoulder Arthroplasty
    Athwal, George S.
    Sperling, John W.
    Rispoli, Damian M.
    Cofield, Robert H.
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2009, 91A (03): : 594 - 603
  • [35] Periprosthetic humeral fractures after shoulder arthroplasty
    Kumar, S
    Sperling, JW
    Haidukewych, GH
    Cofield, RH
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2004, 86A (04): : 680 - 689
  • [36] Safety and efficacy of arthroscopy in the setting of shoulder arthroplasty
    Heaven S.
    de SA D.
    Duong A.
    Simunovic N.
    Ayeni O.R.
    Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine, 2016, 9 (1) : 54 - 58
  • [37] Risk Factors and Prophylactic Measures for Shoulder Periprosthetic Joint Infection After Primary Arthroplasty
    Dhillon, Ekamjeet S.
    Yao, Jie J.
    Jurgensmeier, Kevin
    Schiffman, Corey J.
    Whitson, Anastasia J.
    Matsen III, Frederick A.
    Hsu, Jason E.
    JBJS OPEN ACCESS, 2023, 8 (02)
  • [38] Propionibacterium acnes infection after shoulder arthroplasty: A diagnostic challenge
    Dodson, Christopher C.
    Craig, Edward V.
    Cordasco, Frank A.
    Dines, David M.
    Dines, Joshua S.
    DiCarlo, Edward
    Brause, Barry D.
    Warren, Russell F.
    JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2010, 19 (02) : 303 - 307
  • [39] DIAGNOSTIC AND SURGICAL ARTHROSCOPY OF THE SHOULDER IN ATHLETES
    LOSSE, GM
    ORWIG, JB
    SKYHAR, M
    MEDICINE AND SCIENCE IN SPORTS AND EXERCISE, 1984, 16 (02): : 205 - 205
  • [40] DIAGNOSTIC-VALUE OF ARTHROSCOPY OF THE SHOULDER
    BRULHART, KB
    ROGGO, A
    KOSSMANN, T
    DUFF, C
    SCHIMMER, R
    GLINZ, W
    DEUTSCHE MEDIZINISCHE WOCHENSCHRIFT, 1993, 118 (33) : 1201 - 1204