Long-Term Test-Retest Reliability of Baseline Cognitive Assessments Using ImPACT

被引:170
|
作者
Schatz, Philip [1 ]
机构
[1] St Josephs Univ, Dept Psychol, Philadelphia, PA 19131 USA
来源
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE | 2010年 / 38卷 / 01期
关键词
concussion; neurocognitive testing; neuropsychological testing; baseline assessment; SPORT-RELATED CONCUSSION; COMPUTER-BASED ASSESSMENT; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT; PROFESSIONAL FOOTBALL; AGREEMENT STATEMENT; TEST-PERFORMANCE; SEX-DIFFERENCES; RECOVERY; MANAGEMENT; SYMPTOMS;
D O I
10.1177/0363546509343805
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Computer-based assessment programs are commonly used to document baseline cognitive performance for comparison with postconcussion testing. There are currently no guidelines for how often baseline assessments should be updated, and no data documenting the test-retest stability of baseline measures over relevant time periods. Purpose: To establish long-term test-retest reliability of baseline assessments using ImPACT, and to compare various statistical methods for establishing test-retest reliability. Study Design: Case series; Level Of evidence, 4. Methods: Participants were 95 collegiate varsity athletes completing baseline cognitive testing at 2 time periods, approximately 2 years apart. No participant sustained a concussion between assessments. All athletes completed the ImPACT test battery; dependent measures were the composite scores and total symptom scale score. Results: Intraclass correlation coefficient estimates for visual memory (.65), processing speed (.74), and reaction time (.68) composite scores reflected stability over the 2-year period, with greater variability in verbal memory (.46) and symptom scale (.43) scores. Using reliable change indices and regression-based methods, only a small percentage of participants' scores showed "reliable" or "significant" change on the composite scores (0%-6%), or symptom scale scores (5%-10%). Conclusion: The current results suggest that college athletes' cognitive performance at baseline remains considerably stable over a 2-year period. These data help establish the effects of longer, clinically pragmatic testing intervals on test-retest reliability. Clinical Implications: The current results suggest that stretching the time between baseline assessments from 1 to 2 years may have little effect on the clinical management of concussions in collegiate athletes. These results should not be generalized to collegiate football players, who were not included in this sample. Youth athletes (high school and younger) should continue to receive annually updated baseline assessments until prospective study of the stability of baseline assessments for this younger age group can be completed.
引用
收藏
页码:47 / 53
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Test-retest Reliability Of Remote Impact Administration
    Netzel, Lauren
    Moran, Ryan
    Hopfe, Dustin
    Taylor, Madison R.
    Kelly, Marie
    Pavilionis, Philip
    Salvatore, Anthony P.
    Brown, Warren
    Constantino, Nora L.
    Murray, Nicholas G.
    MEDICINE AND SCIENCE IN SPORTS AND EXERCISE, 2021, 53 (08): : 376 - 376
  • [22] Test-retest reliability of the cognitive lifetime drinking history
    Russell, M
    Marshall, JR
    Trevisan, M
    Freudenheim, JL
    Chan, AWK
    Markovic, N
    Vana, JE
    Priore, RL
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1997, 146 (11) : 975 - 981
  • [23] The Effect of Test Setting Upon Test-Retest Reliability of ImPACT Baseline Tests in High School Athletes
    Roberts, Mark Thomas William
    Lichtenstein, Jonathan Danield
    NEUROLOGY, 2022, 98
  • [24] The Effect of Test Setting Upon Test-Retest Reliability of ImPACT Baseline Tests in High School Athletes
    Roberts, Mark Thomas William
    Lichtenstein, Jonathan Danield
    NEUROLOGY, 2022, 98 (1S) : S23 - S23
  • [25] Short-term test-retest reliability of the ImPACT in healthy young athletes
    O'Brien, Amanda M.
    Casey, Joseph E.
    Salmon, Rachel M.
    APPLIED NEUROPSYCHOLOGY-CHILD, 2018, 7 (03) : 208 - 216
  • [26] Test-retest reliability of a new questionnaire for the retrospective assessment of long-term lithium use in bipolar disorder
    Tighe, Sarah K.
    Ritchey, Megan
    Schweizer, Barbara
    Goes, Fernando S.
    MacKinnon, Dean
    Mondimore, Francis
    DePaulo, J. Raymond
    McMahon, Francis J.
    Schulze, Thomas G.
    Zandi, Peter P.
    Potash, James B.
    JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS, 2015, 174 : 589 - 593
  • [27] Long-Term Test-Retest Reliability of Auditory Gamma Oscillations Between Different Clinical EEG Systems
    Hirano, Yoji
    Nakamura, Itta
    Tamura, Shunsuke
    Onitsuka, Toshiaki
    FRONTIERS IN PSYCHIATRY, 2020, 11
  • [28] Normative data and long-term test-retest reliability of the triple stimulation technique (TST) in multiple sclerosis
    Hofstadt-van Oy, U.
    Keune, P. M.
    Muenssinger, J.
    Hagenburger, D.
    Oschmann, P.
    CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2015, 126 (02) : 356 - 364
  • [29] The test-retest reliability of a battery of new occupational performance assessments COMMENT
    Bassett, Hazel
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THERAPY AND REHABILITATION, 2008, 15 (12): : 571 - 571
  • [30] Long-Term Test-Retest Reliability of Resting-State Networks in Healthy Elderly Subjects and Patients with Amnestic Mild Cognitive Impairment
    Blautzik, Janusch
    Keeser, Daniel
    Berman, Albert
    Paolini, Marco
    Kirsch, Valerie
    Mueller, Sophia
    Coates, Ute
    Reiser, Maximilian
    Teipel, Stefan J.
    Meindl, Thomas
    JOURNAL OF ALZHEIMERS DISEASE, 2013, 34 (03) : 741 - 754