Long-Term Test-Retest Reliability of Baseline Cognitive Assessments Using ImPACT

被引:170
|
作者
Schatz, Philip [1 ]
机构
[1] St Josephs Univ, Dept Psychol, Philadelphia, PA 19131 USA
来源
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE | 2010年 / 38卷 / 01期
关键词
concussion; neurocognitive testing; neuropsychological testing; baseline assessment; SPORT-RELATED CONCUSSION; COMPUTER-BASED ASSESSMENT; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT; PROFESSIONAL FOOTBALL; AGREEMENT STATEMENT; TEST-PERFORMANCE; SEX-DIFFERENCES; RECOVERY; MANAGEMENT; SYMPTOMS;
D O I
10.1177/0363546509343805
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Computer-based assessment programs are commonly used to document baseline cognitive performance for comparison with postconcussion testing. There are currently no guidelines for how often baseline assessments should be updated, and no data documenting the test-retest stability of baseline measures over relevant time periods. Purpose: To establish long-term test-retest reliability of baseline assessments using ImPACT, and to compare various statistical methods for establishing test-retest reliability. Study Design: Case series; Level Of evidence, 4. Methods: Participants were 95 collegiate varsity athletes completing baseline cognitive testing at 2 time periods, approximately 2 years apart. No participant sustained a concussion between assessments. All athletes completed the ImPACT test battery; dependent measures were the composite scores and total symptom scale score. Results: Intraclass correlation coefficient estimates for visual memory (.65), processing speed (.74), and reaction time (.68) composite scores reflected stability over the 2-year period, with greater variability in verbal memory (.46) and symptom scale (.43) scores. Using reliable change indices and regression-based methods, only a small percentage of participants' scores showed "reliable" or "significant" change on the composite scores (0%-6%), or symptom scale scores (5%-10%). Conclusion: The current results suggest that college athletes' cognitive performance at baseline remains considerably stable over a 2-year period. These data help establish the effects of longer, clinically pragmatic testing intervals on test-retest reliability. Clinical Implications: The current results suggest that stretching the time between baseline assessments from 1 to 2 years may have little effect on the clinical management of concussions in collegiate athletes. These results should not be generalized to collegiate football players, who were not included in this sample. Youth athletes (high school and younger) should continue to receive annually updated baseline assessments until prospective study of the stability of baseline assessments for this younger age group can be completed.
引用
收藏
页码:47 / 53
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Long-term Stability and Reliability of Baseline Cognitive Assessments in High School Athletes Using ImPACT at 1-, 2-, and 3-year Test-Retest Intervals
    Brett, Benjamin L.
    Smyk, Nathan
    Solomon, Gary
    Baughman, Brandon C.
    Schatz, Philip
    ARCHIVES OF CLINICAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGY, 2016, 31 (08) : 904 - 914
  • [2] Long-term test-retest reliability of delayed reward discounting in adolescents
    Anokhin, Andrey P.
    Golosheykin, Simon
    Mulligan, Richard C.
    BEHAVIOURAL PROCESSES, 2015, 111 : 55 - 59
  • [3] LONG TERM TEST-RETEST RELIABILITY OF CREATIVITY TESTS
    CROPLEY, AJ
    CLAPSON, L
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1971, 41 (JUN) : 206 - &
  • [4] Long-term test-retest reliability of the California Verbal Learning Test - second edition
    Alioto, Andrea G.
    Kramer, Joel H.
    Borish, Sarah
    Neuhaus, John
    Saloner, Rowan
    Wynn, Matthew
    Foley, Jessica M.
    CLINICAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGIST, 2017, 31 (08) : 1449 - 1458
  • [5] Test-retest reliability of cognitive EEG
    McEvoy, LK
    Smith, ME
    Gevins, A
    CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2000, 111 (03) : 457 - 463
  • [6] Long-term test-retest reliability of functional MRI in a classification learning task
    Aron, AR
    Gluck, MA
    Poldrack, RA
    NEUROIMAGE, 2006, 29 (03) : 1000 - 1006
  • [7] Long-Term Test-Retest Reliability of the UPSIT in Cognitively Intact Older Adults
    Devanand, Davangere P.
    Liu, Xinhua
    Cohen, Hannah
    Budrow, John
    Schupf, Nicole
    Manly, Jennifer
    Lee, Seonjoo
    CHEMICAL SENSES, 2019, 44 (06) : 365 - 369
  • [8] Assessing Long-Term Test-Retest Reliability of the CPT-IP in Schizophrenia
    Hahn, Eric
    Vollath, Andrea
    Ta, Tam T. M.
    Hahn, Constanze
    Kuehl, Linn K.
    Dettling, Michael
    Neuhaus, Andres H.
    PLOS ONE, 2014, 9 (01):
  • [9] Short-term and long-term test-retest reliability of the Nasality Severity Index 2.0
    Bettens, Kim
    Wuyts, Floris L.
    D'haeseleer, Evelien
    Luyten, Anke
    Meerschman, Iris
    Van Crayelynghe, Carole
    Van Lierde, Kristiane M.
    JOURNAL OF COMMUNICATION DISORDERS, 2016, 62 : 1 - 11
  • [10] Long-term test-retest reliability of personality disorder diagnoses in opiate dependent patients
    Cacciola, JS
    Rutherford, MJ
    Alterman, AI
    McKay, JR
    Mulvaney, FD
    JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY DISORDERS, 1998, 12 (04) : 332 - 337