Fur seals and fisheries in Tasmania: an integrated case study of human-wildlife conflict and coexistence

被引:19
|
作者
Cummings, C. R. [1 ]
Lea, M. A. [1 ]
Lyle, J. M. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tasmania, Inst Marine & Antarctic Studies, Ecol & Biodivers Ctr, 20 Castray Esplanade, Hobart, Tas 7004, Australia
[2] Univ Tasmania, Inst Marine & Antarctic Studies, Fisheries & Aquaculture Ctr, Taroona, Tas 7053, Australia
关键词
Seal; Fisheries; Human-wildlife conflict; Conservation; OPERATIONAL INTERACTION; GILLNET FISHERY; MARINE MAMMALS; HABITAT USE; MANAGEMENT; PUSILLUS; CONSERVATION; POPULATION; AUSTRALIA; LIONS;
D O I
10.1016/j.biocon.2019.01.029
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Cultivating more harmonious ways of interacting with top predators is a major challenge in sustainably managing and developing fisheries. In-depth, interdisciplinary case studies represent important tools for high-lighting emergent properties in complex human-predator relationships. In this study we integrate original social research with detailed secondary historic and natural-scientific information on a long-standing case of human-wildlife conflict: the relationship between fur seals and fisheries in Tasmania. Stakeholders were targeted and surveyed via anonymous questionnaire about their experiences and perceptions of seal-fishery interactions and seals in the ecosystem. The most frequently cited outcomes of interactions for both commercial and recreational fishers were damaged gear, lost catch, and damaged catch. Most fishers indicated that they believed population-level controlled culling or targeted removal of problem individuals would be the most effective strategies to manage and reduce interactions. In contrast, the general public and resource/environmental managers indicated strong preferences for non-lethal forms of management, with culling the lowest ranked strategy in terms of perceived effectiveness. Perceptions of ongoing rapid population increase evident in fishing sub-groups contrast with available seal population data. Such discrepancy suggests that reported increasing seal-fishery interactions may be more reflective of behavioural change, with seals becoming habituated to certain fishing activities. Areas of promise identified for future research and management focus on: technical mitigation to minimise direct interactions, building tolerance in fishing communities, and targeted ecological research to disentangle the effects of pinniped abundance, distribution (including seasonal population flux between breeding regions), and habituation on interactions. Documenting the contemporary status of this relationship is an integral step in managing such conflicts.
引用
收藏
页码:532 / 542
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Moral dimensions of human-wildlife conflict
    Lute, Michelle L.
    Navarrete, Carlos David
    Nelson, Michael Paul
    Gore, Meredith L.
    CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 2016, 30 (06) : 1200 - 1211
  • [32] Rearticulating the myth of human-wildlife conflict
    Peterson, M. Nils
    Birckhead, Jessie L.
    Leong, Kirsten
    Peterson, Markus J.
    Peterson, Tarla Rai
    CONSERVATION LETTERS, 2010, 3 (02): : 74 - 82
  • [33] Addressing inequality and intolerance in human-wildlife coexistence
    Jordan, Neil R.
    Smith, Bradley P.
    Appleby, Robert G.
    van Eeden, Lily M.
    Webster, Hugh S.
    CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 2020, 34 (04) : 803 - 810
  • [34] The unequal burden of human-wildlife conflict
    Alexander R. Braczkowski
    Christopher J. O’Bryan
    Christian Lessmann
    Carlo Rondinini
    Anna P. Crysell
    Sophie Gilbert
    Martin Stringer
    Luke Gibson
    Duan Biggs
    Communications Biology, 6
  • [35] The Escalating Effects of Wildlife Tourism on Human-Wildlife Conflict
    Cui, Qingming
    Ren, Yuejia
    Xu, Honggang
    ANIMALS, 2021, 11 (05):
  • [36] Coexisting With Different Human-Wildlife Coexistence Perspectives
    Glikman, Jenny Anne
    Frank, Beatrice
    Ruppert, Kirstie A. A.
    Knox, Jillian
    Sponarski, Carly C. C.
    Metcalf, Elizabeth Covelli
    Metcalf, Alexander L. L.
    Marchini, Silvio
    FRONTIERS IN CONSERVATION SCIENCE, 2021, 2
  • [37] Coexistence and the SDGs: an argument for a rights-based approach to human-wildlife conflict in India
    Sarma, Ujjal Kumar
    Barpujari, Indrani
    HUMAN DIMENSIONS OF WILDLIFE, 2024,
  • [38] Creating constellations of coexistence through connections between people in human-wildlife conflict areas
    Green, Aalayna
    Chakrabarti, Stotra
    Shivakumar, Shweta
    Hughes, Courtney
    Banerjee, Sayan
    Kinyanjui, Maureen
    Mbizah, Moreangels
    Ohrens, Omar
    Thiemke, Abigail
    CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 2024, 38 (06)
  • [39] Sensitization to human decreases human-wildlife conflict: empirical and simulation study
    Takeshi Honda
    Naoto Yamabata
    Hayato Iijima
    Kenta Uchida
    European Journal of Wildlife Research, 2019, 65
  • [40] Sensitization to human decreases human-wildlife conflict: empirical and simulation study
    Honda, Takeshi
    Yamabata, Naoto
    Iijima, Hayato
    Uchida, Kenta
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE RESEARCH, 2019, 65 (05)