Effects of protein concentration and detergent on endotoxin reduction by ultrafiltration

被引:36
|
作者
Jang, Hyun [3 ]
Kim, Hyo-Seung [3 ]
Moon, Seung-Cheol [3 ]
Lee, Young-Rae [1 ,2 ]
Yu, Kang-Yeoul [1 ,2 ]
Lee, Byeong-Kil [4 ]
Youn, Hyun Zo [4 ]
Jeong, Young-Ju [5 ]
Kim, Byeong-Soo [6 ]
Lee, Sung-Ho [6 ]
Kim, Jong-Suk [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Chonbuk Natl Univ, Sch Med, Dept Biochem, Jeonju 561180, South Korea
[2] Chonbuk Natl Univ, Sch Med, Inst Med Sci, Jeonju 561180, South Korea
[3] Komipharm Co, R&D Ctr, Shihung, South Korea
[4] Chonbuk Natl Univ, Sch Med, Dept Surg, Jeonju 561180, South Korea
[5] Chonbuk Natl Univ, Sch Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Jeonju 561180, South Korea
[6] Kongju Natl Univ, Coll Med, Dept Compan & Lab Anim Sci, Yesan 340702, South Korea
关键词
Chromatography; Detergent; Endotoxin; Lipopolysaccharide (LPS); Ultrafiltration; BACTERIAL LIPOPOLYSACCHARIDE; REMOVAL;
D O I
10.5483/BMBRep.2009.42.7.462
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Lipopolysaccharide (LPS), found in the outer membrane of Gram negative bacteria, only exerts its toxic effects when in free form. LPS has three major parts, lipid A, the toxic component, along with a core polysaccharide and O-specific polysaccharide. LPS monomers are known to have molecular masses between 10 to 30 kDa. Under physiological conditions, LPS exists in equilibrium between monomer and vesicle forms. LPS removal by 100 kDa ultrafiltration was more efficient (99.6% of LPS removed) with a low concentration of protein (2.0 mg/ml) compared to a high concentration (20.1 mg/ml). In the presence of different detergents (0.5% Tween 20, 1.0% taurodeoxycholate and 1.0% Triton X-100), LPS removal was more efficient at low protein concentrations (2.0 mg/ml) compared to high protein concentrations (20.1 mg/ml). [BMB reports 2009; 42(7): 462-466]
引用
收藏
页码:462 / 466
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Milk protein concentration by ultrafiltration with rotating disk modules
    Ding, LH
    Al-Akoum, O
    Abraham, A
    Jaffrin, MY
    DESALINATION, 2002, 144 (1-3) : 307 - 311
  • [22] CONCENTRATION OF PROTEIN SOLUTIONS BY ULTRAFILTRATION THROUGH DIALYSIS TUBING
    GRANT, GH
    ROWE, DS
    STANWORTH, DR
    BIOCHEMICAL JOURNAL, 1958, 69 : P13 - P13
  • [23] ULTRAFILTRATION AND PLASMA-PROTEIN CONCENTRATION IN THE MICROCIRCULATION OF THE FEET
    MOYSES, C
    MICHEL, CC
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MICROCIRCULATION-CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL, 1985, 4 (02): : 194 - 194
  • [24] Quantitative determination of Ca2+ effects on endotoxin removal and protein yield in a two-stage ultrafiltration process
    Li, LP
    Luo, RG
    SEPARATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 1999, 34 (09) : 1729 - 1741
  • [25] ANALYSIS OF STERIC HINDRANCE REDUCTION IN PULSED PROTEIN ULTRAFILTRATION
    RODGERS, VGJ
    MILLER, KD
    JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE, 1993, 85 (01) : 39 - 58
  • [26] REDUCTION OF MEMBRANE FOULING IN THE ULTRAFILTRATION OF BINARY PROTEIN MIXTURES
    RODGERS, VGJ
    SPARKS, RE
    AICHE JOURNAL, 1991, 37 (10) : 1517 - 1528
  • [27] Ultrafiltration process development for high protein concentration formulations to minimize protein aggregation
    Bhut, Bharat V.
    Shi, Miao
    Govindarajulu, Srujana
    Li, Zheng Jian
    Jin, Mi
    ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2014, 247
  • [28] Ultrafiltration of PEGylated proteins: Fouling and concentration polarization effects
    Kwon, Boksoon
    Molek, Jessica
    Zydney, Andrew L.
    JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE, 2008, 319 (1-2) : 206 - 213
  • [29] Rotation and concentration effects in high-shear ultrafiltration
    Viadero, RC
    Reed, BE
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING-ASCE, 1999, 125 (07): : 638 - 646
  • [30] Milk Protein Concentration Using Negatively Charged Ultrafiltration Membranes
    Arunkumar, Abhiram
    Etzel, Mark R.
    FOODS, 2018, 7 (09):