Influence of reversal of neuromuscular blockade with sugammadex or neostigmine on postoperative quality of recovery following a single bolus dose of rocuronium: A prospective, randomized, double-blinded, controlled study

被引:15
|
作者
Kim, Na Young [1 ]
Koh, Jae Chul [2 ]
Lee, Ki-Young [1 ]
Kim, Sung Soo [3 ]
Hong, Jung Hwa [4 ]
Nam, Hoon Jae [1 ]
Bai, Sun-Joon [1 ]
机构
[1] Yonsei Univ, Coll Med, Anesthesia & Pain Res Inst, Dept Anesthesiol & Pain Med, 50-1 Yonsei Ro, Seoul 03722, South Korea
[2] Korea Univ, Anam Hosp, Coll Med, Dept Anesthesiol & Pain Med, 73 Inchon Ro, Seoul 02841, South Korea
[3] Yonsei Univ, Inst Vis Res, Coll Med, Dept Ophthalmol, 50-1 Yonsei Ro, Seoul 03722, South Korea
[4] Natl Hlth Insurance Serv Ilsan Hosp, Dept Policy Res Affairs, Goyang, Gyeonggi Do, South Korea
关键词
Anesthesia recovery period; Neostigmine; Neuromuscular blockade; Sugammadex; NAUSEA; GLYCOPYRROLATE; PYRIDOSTIGMINE; CYCLODEXTRIN; FEASIBILITY; ANESTHESIA; VALIDITY; SCALE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclinane.2019.02.014
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Study objective: To evaluate the influence of reversal of neuromuscular blockade with sugammadex or neostigmine on postoperative quality of recovery following a single bolus dose of rocuronium after pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) under general anesthesia. Design: Prospective, double-blind, randomized controlled trial. Setting: This study was conducted in a University Teaching Hospital from February to July 2017. Patients: A total of 84 patients with an American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status of I or II who were scheduled to undergo PPV under general anesthesia. Interventions: The patients were randomly assigned to the neostigmine (Group N, n = 44) or sugammadex (Group S, n = 40) groups; 3 ml of study drug was prepared for the patients. For patients in Group N, a solution of neostigmine methylsulfate (1 mg) and glycopyrrolate (0.2 mg) was prepared, while a solution of sugammadex sodium (2 mg/kg) and normal saline was prepared for patients in Group S. Measurements: The primary endpoint was the effect of sugammadex, compared with neostigmine, on the recovery rate in the physiological domain in patients who underwent PPV with general anesthesia. The quality of recovery was assessed using the Postoperative Quality Recovery Scale at 15 min and 40 min after surgery, and on postoperative day 1. Main results: The recovery rate in the physiological domain was higher in Group S at 15 min after surgery (P = 0.020). Though there were no significant differences in the overall cognitive recovery domain, patients in Group S could recall more numbers in reverse order. However, there were no significant differences between the groups in the other domains of the scale. Conclusions: The use of sugammadex may increase the quality of physiological recovery at early postoperative periods, compared with that of neostigmine, following a single bolus dose of rocuronium in patients undergoing PPV with general anesthesia.
引用
收藏
页码:97 / 102
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The evaluation of the analgesic effect of intraperitoneal bupivacaine versus bupivacaine with neostigmine on postoperative pain in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized controlled double-blinded study
    Mohamed S. Arafa
    Hassan Mohamed Ahmed
    Abdelrahman Bakr Elnabawy
    Sara Farouk Kassem
    [J]. Ain-Shams Journal of Anesthesiology, 14
  • [22] The evaluation of the analgesic effect of intraperitoneal bupivacaine versus bupivacaine with neostigmine on postoperative pain in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized controlled double-blinded study
    Arafa, Mohamed S.
    Ahmed, Hassan Mohamed
    Elnabawy, Abdelrahman Bakr
    Kassem, Sara Farouk
    [J]. AIN SHAMS JOURNAL OF ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2022, 14 (01)
  • [23] Antagonization of neuromuscular blockade by sugammadex vs. neostigmine in patients undergoing robotic-assisted urological procedures - effect on extubation time and quality of the recovery - monocentric prospective randomized study
    Schraml, J.
    Kokoska, V
    Broul, M.
    Skulec, R.
    Skola, J.
    Astapenko, D.
    Cerny, V
    [J]. ANESTEZIOLOGIE A INTENZIVNI MEDICINA, 2021, 32 (4-5): : 191 - 196
  • [24] The effect of mesh fixation on migration and postoperative pain in laparoscopic TEP repair: prospective randomized double-blinded controlled study
    Yildirim, M. B.
    Sahiner, I. T.
    [J]. HERNIA, 2023, 27 (01) : 63 - 70
  • [25] The effect of mesh fixation on migration and postoperative pain in laparoscopic TEP repair: prospective randomized double-blinded controlled study
    M. B. Yıldırım
    I. T. Sahiner
    [J]. Hernia, 2023, 27 : 63 - 70
  • [26] RETRACTED: Comparison of sugammadex and pyridostigmine bromide for reversal of rocuronium-induced neuromuscular blockade in short-term pediatric surgery: A prospective randomized study (Retracted Article)
    An, Jihyun
    Lee, Ji-Hyang
    Kim, Eunju
    Woo, Kyeongyoon
    Kim, Hyunkyum
    Lee, Donghwan
    [J]. MEDICINE, 2020, 99 (07)
  • [27] Effect of transversus abdominis plane block on the quality of recovery in laparoscopic nephrectomy: A prospective double-blinded randomized controlled clinical trial
    Park, Jun-Mo
    Lee, Joonhee
    [J]. MEDICINE, 2022, 101 (41) : E31168
  • [28] Ketorolac use for postoperative pain management following lumbar decompression surgery - A prospective, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial
    Cassinelli, Ezequiel H.
    Dean, Clayton L.
    Garcia, Ryan M.
    Furey, Christopher G.
    Bohlman, Henry H.
    [J]. SPINE, 2008, 33 (12) : 1313 - 1317
  • [29] Postoperative pain following laser fistula closure versus ligation of the intersphincteric fistula tract: A prospective double-blinded randomized controlled trial
    Low, Jolynn Qian Lin
    Rajandram, Retnagowri
    Aziz, Mohamed Rezal Abdul
    Roslani, April Camilla
    [J]. WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2024, 48 (08) : 1990 - 1999
  • [30] Influence of deep neuromuscular block on the surgeons assessment of surgical conditions during laparotomy: a randomized controlled double blinded trial with rocuronium and sugammadex (vol 119, pg 435, 2017)
    Madsen, M. V.
    Scheppan, S.
    Mork, E.
    Kissmeyer, P.
    Rosenberg, J.
    Gaetke, M. R.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2017, 119 (06) : 1247 - 1247