3D echoendoscopy and miniprobes for rectal cancer staging

被引:2
|
作者
Castro-Pocas, Fernando [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Dinis-Ribeiro, Mario [4 ]
Rocha, Anabela [3 ,5 ]
Araujo, Tarcisio [2 ]
Pedroto, Isabel [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Santo Antonio Hosp, Porto Hosp Ctr, Dept Ultrasound, P-4099001 Porto, Portugal
[2] Santo Antonio Hosp, Porto Hosp Ctr, Dept Gastroenterol, P-4099001 Porto, Portugal
[3] Univ Porto, Inst Ciencias Biomed Abel Salazar, Porto, Portugal
[4] Univ Porto, Fac Med, Ctr Hlth Technol & Serv Res, Porto, Portugal
[5] Santo Antonio Hosp, Porto Hosp Ctr, Serv Gen Surg, Unit Digest Surg, Porto, Portugal
关键词
Human colon; Miniprobes; Endoscopic Ultrasonography; Intestinal wall; ENDOSCOPIC ULTRASONOGRAPHY; ENDORECTAL ULTRASOUND; COLORECTAL-CANCER; LIMITATIONS; TUMORS;
D O I
10.17235/reed.2018.4453/2016
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: rectal cancer staging using rigid probes or echoendoscopes has some limitations. The aim of the study was to compare rectal cancer preoperative staging using conventional endoluminal ultrasonography with three-dimensional endoscopic ultrasonography and miniprobes. Materials and methods: sixty patients were included and evaluated with: a) a conventional echoendoscope (7.5 and 12 MHz); b) miniprobes (12 MHz); and c) the Easy 3D Freescan software for three-dimensional endoscopic ultrasonography. The reference or gold standard was conventional endoluminal ultrasonography in all cases and pathological assessment for those without preoperative therapy. The differences in T and N staging accuracy in both longitudinal and circumferential extension were evaluated. Results: with regard to T staging, conventional endoluminal ultrasonography had an accuracy of 85% (compared to pathological analysis), and the agreement between miniprobes vs conventional endoluminal ultrasonography (kappa = 0.81) and three-dimensional endoscopic ultrasonography vs conventional endoluminal ultrasonography (k = 0.87) was significant. In addition, miniprobes had an accuracy of 82% and three-dimensional endoscopic ultrasonography had a higher accuracy (96%). With regard to N staging, conventional endoluminal ultrasonography had an accuracy of 91% with a sensitivity of 78%. However, the agreement between miniprobes and conventional endoluminal ultrasonography and three-dimensional endoscopic ultrasonography and conventional endoluminal ultrasonography (k = 0.70) was lower. Interestingly, miniprobes had a lower accuracy of 81% whereas three-dimensional endoscopic ultrasonography had an accuracy of 100% without any false negative. No false positives were observed in any of the techniques. Accuracy for T and N staging was not influenced by longitudinal or circumferential extensions of the tumor in all types of endoscopic ultrasonography analyzed. Conclusions: miniprobes and especially three-dimensional endoscopic ultrasonography may be relevant during rectal cancer staging.
引用
收藏
页码:306 / 310
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Staging and treatment of early rectal cancer
    Schlag, PM
    Diemann, J
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1997, 33 : 981 - 981
  • [42] Progress in rectal cancer staging and treatment
    M. G. Pramateftakis
    D. Kanellos
    G. Vrakas
    Τ. Tsachalis
    D. Raptis
    A. Makrantonakis
    Z. Koukouritaki
    I. Kanellos
    Techniques in Coloproctology, 2010, 14 : 29 - 31
  • [43] Primary rectal cancer local staging
    Hoeffel, C.
    Mule, S.
    Laurent, V.
    Bouche, O.
    Volet, J.
    Soyer, P.
    DIAGNOSTIC AND INTERVENTIONAL IMAGING, 2014, 95 (05) : 485 - 494
  • [44] THE CLINICAL STAGING OF RECTAL-CANCER
    NICHOLLS, RJ
    MASON, AY
    MORSON, BC
    DIXON, AK
    FRY, IK
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1982, 69 (07) : 404 - 409
  • [45] Optimal methods for staging rectal cancer
    Muthusamy, V. Raman
    Chang, Kenneth J.
    CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH, 2007, 13 (22) : 6877S - 6882S
  • [46] Progress in rectal cancer staging and treatment
    Pramateftakis, M. G.
    Kanellos, D.
    Vrakas, G.
    Tsachalis, T.
    Raptis, D.
    Makrantonakis, A.
    Koukouritaki, Z.
    Kanellos, I.
    TECHNIQUES IN COLOPROCTOLOGY, 2010, 14 : S29 - S31
  • [47] Current trends in staging rectal cancer
    Samee, Abdus
    Selvasekar, Chelliah Ramachandran
    WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2011, 17 (07) : 828 - 834
  • [48] Rectal cancer staging and planning management
    Nicholls, RJ
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 9TH BIENNIAL CONGRESS OF THE EUROPEAN COUNCIL OF COLOPROCTOLOGY, ECCP, 2003, : 99 - 102
  • [49] Current MRI Staging of Rectal Cancer
    Wietek, B. M.
    Kratt, T.
    ROFO-FORTSCHRITTE AUF DEM GEBIET DER RONTGENSTRAHLEN UND DER BILDGEBENDEN VERFAHREN, 2012, 184 (11): : 992 - 1001
  • [50] Local radiological staging of rectal cancer
    Brown, G
    CLINICAL RADIOLOGY, 2004, 59 (03) : 213 - 214