3D echoendoscopy and miniprobes for rectal cancer staging

被引:2
|
作者
Castro-Pocas, Fernando [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Dinis-Ribeiro, Mario [4 ]
Rocha, Anabela [3 ,5 ]
Araujo, Tarcisio [2 ]
Pedroto, Isabel [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Santo Antonio Hosp, Porto Hosp Ctr, Dept Ultrasound, P-4099001 Porto, Portugal
[2] Santo Antonio Hosp, Porto Hosp Ctr, Dept Gastroenterol, P-4099001 Porto, Portugal
[3] Univ Porto, Inst Ciencias Biomed Abel Salazar, Porto, Portugal
[4] Univ Porto, Fac Med, Ctr Hlth Technol & Serv Res, Porto, Portugal
[5] Santo Antonio Hosp, Porto Hosp Ctr, Serv Gen Surg, Unit Digest Surg, Porto, Portugal
关键词
Human colon; Miniprobes; Endoscopic Ultrasonography; Intestinal wall; ENDOSCOPIC ULTRASONOGRAPHY; ENDORECTAL ULTRASOUND; COLORECTAL-CANCER; LIMITATIONS; TUMORS;
D O I
10.17235/reed.2018.4453/2016
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: rectal cancer staging using rigid probes or echoendoscopes has some limitations. The aim of the study was to compare rectal cancer preoperative staging using conventional endoluminal ultrasonography with three-dimensional endoscopic ultrasonography and miniprobes. Materials and methods: sixty patients were included and evaluated with: a) a conventional echoendoscope (7.5 and 12 MHz); b) miniprobes (12 MHz); and c) the Easy 3D Freescan software for three-dimensional endoscopic ultrasonography. The reference or gold standard was conventional endoluminal ultrasonography in all cases and pathological assessment for those without preoperative therapy. The differences in T and N staging accuracy in both longitudinal and circumferential extension were evaluated. Results: with regard to T staging, conventional endoluminal ultrasonography had an accuracy of 85% (compared to pathological analysis), and the agreement between miniprobes vs conventional endoluminal ultrasonography (kappa = 0.81) and three-dimensional endoscopic ultrasonography vs conventional endoluminal ultrasonography (k = 0.87) was significant. In addition, miniprobes had an accuracy of 82% and three-dimensional endoscopic ultrasonography had a higher accuracy (96%). With regard to N staging, conventional endoluminal ultrasonography had an accuracy of 91% with a sensitivity of 78%. However, the agreement between miniprobes and conventional endoluminal ultrasonography and three-dimensional endoscopic ultrasonography and conventional endoluminal ultrasonography (k = 0.70) was lower. Interestingly, miniprobes had a lower accuracy of 81% whereas three-dimensional endoscopic ultrasonography had an accuracy of 100% without any false negative. No false positives were observed in any of the techniques. Accuracy for T and N staging was not influenced by longitudinal or circumferential extensions of the tumor in all types of endoscopic ultrasonography analyzed. Conclusions: miniprobes and especially three-dimensional endoscopic ultrasonography may be relevant during rectal cancer staging.
引用
收藏
页码:306 / 310
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The Accuracy of 3D Rectal Ultrasound for Pre-Operative Rectal Cancer Staging
    Arya, Aman V.
    Romagnoli, Cesare
    Man, Lu
    Hussain, Nadeem
    Fenster, Aaron
    Yan, Brian
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2012, 142 (05) : S342 - S342
  • [2] Experience with ultrasound miniprobes in the staging of colorectal cancer
    Krakamp, B
    Parusel, M
    Weber, M
    Brincker, C
    ENDOSCOPY, 2004, 36 (04) : 373 - +
  • [3] Staging echoendoscopy in esophagogastric cancer patients ongoing surgery
    Villaescusa, A.
    Delgado Urena, M. T.
    Gonzalez-Astorga, B.
    Galvez Montosa, F.
    Yelamos Vargas, M.
    Rodriguez Gonzalez, C. J.
    Jurado Garcia, J. M.
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2015, 26
  • [4] Moving from 2D to 3D: Volumetric Medical Image Classification for Rectal Cancer Staging
    Lee, Joohyung
    Oh, Jieun
    Shin, Inkyu
    Kim, You-Sung
    Sohn, Dae Kyung
    Kim, Tae-Sung
    Kweon, In So
    MEDICAL IMAGE COMPUTING AND COMPUTER ASSISTED INTERVENTION, MICCAI 2022, PT III, 2022, 13433 : 780 - 790
  • [6] Staging of Rectal Cancer-Technique and Interpretation of Evaluating Rectal Adenocarcinoma, uT1-4, N Disease: 2D and 3D Evaluation
    Tan, Ker-Kan
    Tsang, Charles B.
    SEMINARS IN COLON AND RECTAL SURGERY, 2010, 21 (04) : 197 - 204
  • [7] Rectal cancer staging
    Torricelli, Pietro
    SURGICAL ONCOLOGY-OXFORD, 2007, 16 : S49 - S50
  • [8] Rectal Cancer: Staging
    Curvo-Semedo, Luis
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2020, 28 (01) : 105 - +
  • [9] Staging of Rectal Cancer
    Germer, C. T.
    CHIRURG, 2012, 83 (05): : 421 - 422
  • [10] Staging of rectal cancer
    Wiggers, T
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2003, 90 (08) : 895 - 896