3D echoendoscopy and miniprobes for rectal cancer staging
被引:2
|
作者:
Castro-Pocas, Fernando
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Santo Antonio Hosp, Porto Hosp Ctr, Dept Ultrasound, P-4099001 Porto, Portugal
Santo Antonio Hosp, Porto Hosp Ctr, Dept Gastroenterol, P-4099001 Porto, Portugal
Univ Porto, Inst Ciencias Biomed Abel Salazar, Porto, PortugalSanto Antonio Hosp, Porto Hosp Ctr, Dept Ultrasound, P-4099001 Porto, Portugal
Castro-Pocas, Fernando
[1
,2
,3
]
Dinis-Ribeiro, Mario
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Univ Porto, Fac Med, Ctr Hlth Technol & Serv Res, Porto, PortugalSanto Antonio Hosp, Porto Hosp Ctr, Dept Ultrasound, P-4099001 Porto, Portugal
Dinis-Ribeiro, Mario
[4
]
Rocha, Anabela
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Univ Porto, Inst Ciencias Biomed Abel Salazar, Porto, Portugal
Santo Antonio Hosp, Porto Hosp Ctr, Serv Gen Surg, Unit Digest Surg, Porto, PortugalSanto Antonio Hosp, Porto Hosp Ctr, Dept Ultrasound, P-4099001 Porto, Portugal
Rocha, Anabela
[3
,5
]
Araujo, Tarcisio
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Santo Antonio Hosp, Porto Hosp Ctr, Dept Gastroenterol, P-4099001 Porto, PortugalSanto Antonio Hosp, Porto Hosp Ctr, Dept Ultrasound, P-4099001 Porto, Portugal
Araujo, Tarcisio
[2
]
Pedroto, Isabel
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Santo Antonio Hosp, Porto Hosp Ctr, Dept Gastroenterol, P-4099001 Porto, Portugal
Univ Porto, Inst Ciencias Biomed Abel Salazar, Porto, PortugalSanto Antonio Hosp, Porto Hosp Ctr, Dept Ultrasound, P-4099001 Porto, Portugal
Pedroto, Isabel
[2
,3
]
机构:
[1] Santo Antonio Hosp, Porto Hosp Ctr, Dept Ultrasound, P-4099001 Porto, Portugal
[2] Santo Antonio Hosp, Porto Hosp Ctr, Dept Gastroenterol, P-4099001 Porto, Portugal
[3] Univ Porto, Inst Ciencias Biomed Abel Salazar, Porto, Portugal
[4] Univ Porto, Fac Med, Ctr Hlth Technol & Serv Res, Porto, Portugal
[5] Santo Antonio Hosp, Porto Hosp Ctr, Serv Gen Surg, Unit Digest Surg, Porto, Portugal
Background: rectal cancer staging using rigid probes or echoendoscopes has some limitations. The aim of the study was to compare rectal cancer preoperative staging using conventional endoluminal ultrasonography with three-dimensional endoscopic ultrasonography and miniprobes. Materials and methods: sixty patients were included and evaluated with: a) a conventional echoendoscope (7.5 and 12 MHz); b) miniprobes (12 MHz); and c) the Easy 3D Freescan software for three-dimensional endoscopic ultrasonography. The reference or gold standard was conventional endoluminal ultrasonography in all cases and pathological assessment for those without preoperative therapy. The differences in T and N staging accuracy in both longitudinal and circumferential extension were evaluated. Results: with regard to T staging, conventional endoluminal ultrasonography had an accuracy of 85% (compared to pathological analysis), and the agreement between miniprobes vs conventional endoluminal ultrasonography (kappa = 0.81) and three-dimensional endoscopic ultrasonography vs conventional endoluminal ultrasonography (k = 0.87) was significant. In addition, miniprobes had an accuracy of 82% and three-dimensional endoscopic ultrasonography had a higher accuracy (96%). With regard to N staging, conventional endoluminal ultrasonography had an accuracy of 91% with a sensitivity of 78%. However, the agreement between miniprobes and conventional endoluminal ultrasonography and three-dimensional endoscopic ultrasonography and conventional endoluminal ultrasonography (k = 0.70) was lower. Interestingly, miniprobes had a lower accuracy of 81% whereas three-dimensional endoscopic ultrasonography had an accuracy of 100% without any false negative. No false positives were observed in any of the techniques. Accuracy for T and N staging was not influenced by longitudinal or circumferential extensions of the tumor in all types of endoscopic ultrasonography analyzed. Conclusions: miniprobes and especially three-dimensional endoscopic ultrasonography may be relevant during rectal cancer staging.