A Multicenter Study of Patient Acceptability of the IBD Disk Tool and Patient-Reported Disabilities

被引:3
|
作者
Sharma, Neel [1 ]
Savelkoul, Edo [2 ]
Disney, Benjamin [3 ]
Shah, Ashit [4 ]
De Silva, Shanika [5 ]
Pattni, Sanjeev [6 ]
Iacucci, Marietta [7 ]
Cooney, Rachel [1 ]
Ghosh, Subrata [7 ]
机构
[1] Univ Birmingham, Queen Elizabeth Hosp Birmingham, Inst Immunol & Immunotherapy, Birmingham B15 2TT, W Midlands, England
[2] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Nijmegen, Netherlands
[3] Univ Hosp Coventry & Warwickshire, Coventry, W Midlands, England
[4] Royal Wolverhampton NHS Trust, Wolverhampton, England
[5] Dudley Grp NHS Fdn Trust, Dudley, England
[6] Leicester Royal Infirm, Leicester, Leics, England
[7] Univ Birmingham, Queen Elizabeth Hosp Birmingham, Inst Translat Med, NIHR Biomed Res Ctr, Birmingham, W Midlands, England
关键词
IBD Disk; Disability; Joint pain; Energy; Sleep; OUTCOMES; LIFE;
D O I
10.1007/s10620-021-06893-8
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background IBD, both Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis, is associated with significant functional disability. Gastrointestinal symptoms alone are not the sole purpose of the interaction between patients and providers. In order to ascertain patients' disabilities, we utilized the recently developed IBD Disk to help determine their functional concerns and initiate relevant conversation. We aimed to ascertain patient acceptability and their major disabilities. Patients and Methods In this multicenter study, IBD patients at their outpatient visit were given the paper version of the IBD Disk. Patients were asked to score their level of disability for each item of the IBD Disk. The completed scores were then shared with their healthcare provider to act as a focus of discussion during the consultation. Patients and clinicians were also asked to provide informal qualitative feedback as to the benefits of the IBD Disk and areas for improvement. Results A total of 377 (female 60%) patients completed the questionnaires over the study period. Patient acceptability scored on a 0-10 Likert scale was excellent. All patients scored all domains of disability. Sleep, energy, and joint pain were the highest scoring domains of the IBD Disk, scoring higher than digestive symptoms. Clinicians and patients agreed that the IBD Disk allowed for ease of communication about disability symptoms and relevance to their day-to-day functioning. Conclusion The IBD Disk is a novel easy-to-use tool to assess the functional disability of patients. We next plan to utilize it in the form of an electronic app internationally and in relation to treatment commencement and escalation.
引用
收藏
页码:457 / 462
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Acceptability of patient-reported outcomes in electronic documentation of health data: physicians' perspective
    Klein, Toni Maria
    Augustin, Matthias
    Otten, Marina
    [J]. QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2019, 28 : S101 - S101
  • [42] Acceptability of patient-reported outcome measures in women following pelvic floor procedures
    Ruseckaite, Rasa
    Marsh, Lucy
    Dean, Joanne
    Daly, Oliver
    Vasiliadis, Dora
    Ahern, Susannah
    [J]. QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2021, 30 (SUPPL 1) : S35 - S35
  • [43] The acceptability and effectiveness of patient-reported assessments and feedback in a managed behavioral healthcare setting
    Brodey, BB
    Cuffel, B
    McCulloch, J
    Tani, S
    Maruish, M
    Brodey, I
    Unützer, J
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MANAGED CARE, 2005, 11 (12): : 774 - 780
  • [44] Acceptability of patient-reported outcomes in electronic documentation of health data: patients' perspective
    Klein, Toni Maria
    Augustin, Matthias
    Otten, Marina
    [J]. QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2019, 28 : S63 - S63
  • [45] Feasibility and acceptability of integrating patient-reported outcomes into pediatric atopic dermatitis care
    Chang, H.
    Su, H.
    Kartawira, K.
    Grossberg, A.
    Wan, J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INVESTIGATIVE DERMATOLOGY, 2024, 144 (08) : S53 - S53
  • [46] Evaluation of patient-reported outcome measurements as a reliable tool to measure acceptability of the taste of paediatric medicines in an inpatient paediatric population
    Mistry, Punam
    Stirling, Heather
    Callens, Claire
    Hodson, James
    Batchelor, Hannah
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2018, 8 (07):
  • [47] Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) versus patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs)Is there a difference?
    Jokstad, Asbjorn
    [J]. CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL DENTAL RESEARCH, 2018, 4 (03): : 61 - 62
  • [48] Patient-reported experience with patient-reported outcomes in adult patients seen in rheumatology clinics
    Lapin, Brittany
    Honomichl, Ryan
    Thompson, Nicolas
    Schuster, Andrew
    Abelson, Abby
    Deal, Chad
    Rose, Susannah
    Katzan, Irene
    [J]. QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2020, 29 (SUPPL 1) : S34 - S34
  • [49] Patient-reported outcomes and patient-reported outcome measures in liver transplantation: a scoping review
    Vedadi, Ali
    Khairalla, Roula
    Che, Adrian
    Nagee, Ahsas
    Saqib, Mohammed
    Ayub, Ali
    Wasim, Aghna
    Macanovic, Sara
    Orchanian-Cheff, Ani
    Selzner-Malekkiani, Nazia
    Bartlett, Susan
    Mucsi, Istvan
    [J]. QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2023, 32 (09) : 2435 - 2445
  • [50] Patient-Reported Outcomes and Patient-Reported Satisfaction After Surgical Treatment for Cervical Radiculopathy
    Andresen, Andreas Kiilerich
    Paulsen, Rune Tendal
    Busch, Frederik
    Isenberg-Jorgensen, Alexander
    Carreon, Leah Y.
    Andersen, Mikkel O.
    [J]. GLOBAL SPINE JOURNAL, 2018, 8 (07) : 703 - 708