Impact of forest harvest intensity and transportation distance on biomass delivered costs within sustainable forest management - A case study in southeastern Canada

被引:13
|
作者
Shadbahr, Jalil [1 ]
Bensebaa, Farid [1 ]
Ebadian, Mahmood [2 ]
机构
[1] Natl Res Council Canada, Energy Min & Environm Res Ctr, 1200 Montreal Rd, Ottawa, ON K1A 0R6, Canada
[2] Univ British Columbia, Forest Prod Biotechnol Bioenergy Grp, Vancouver, BC, Canada
关键词
Harvest intensity; Pulp quality log; Biomass; Biorefinery; Supply chain; LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; SUPPLY CHAINS; BIOENERGY PRODUCTION; CELLULOSIC ETHANOL; BIOFUEL PRODUCTION; OPTIMIZATION; ENERGY; OPERATIONS; HARDWOODS; EMISSIONS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112073
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This study compares the delivered cost of forest biomass and its associated GHG emissions for three sizes of biorefinery including 50,000 m(3) (small scale), 250,000 m(3) (medium scale), and 700,000 m(3) (large scale). The proposed methodology in this study includes harvest intensity which is often overlooked. The Pontiac region located in the Province of Quebec (Southeastern Canada) is used as a case study due to the availability of data in this forestry biomass rich region. Furthermore, there are significant similarities with other forestry regions to enable generalisation of the proposed case study. Harvest intensities of 423 harvest zones (cutblocks) are considered in cost and GHG emissions analysis of delivered biomass from each cutblock to the biorefinery. The results show that harvest intensities of cutblocks must be prioritized over conventional parameters such as transportation distance. The selection and prioritisation of cutblocks according to transportation distance without considering harvest intensities would result in an increase of about 12.5% in delivered costs of biomass for small and medium scale biorefineries. Results also reveal that the transportation distance would be a more significant parameter when using the same harvest intensity for all the selected cutblocks. Required logistics and harvesting equipment for three biorefinery sizes were also quantified. Sensitivity analysis shows that reduced productivity of harvest equipment by 20% could increase the delivered costs of biomass and GHG emissions by 10% for medium and large scale biorefineries and by 13% for a small scale biorefinery.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Climate Change Mitigation Potential in Boreal Forests: Impacts of Management, Harvest Intensity and Use of Forest Biomass to Substitute Fossil Resources
    Baul, Tarit Kumar
    Alam, Ashraful
    Ikonen, Antti
    Strandman, Harri
    Asikainen, Antti
    Peltola, Heli
    Kilpelainen, Antti
    [J]. FORESTS, 2017, 8 (11):
  • [22] Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Modeling for Impact Assessment in the Context of Sustainable Forest Management: A Greek Case Study
    Kazana, V.
    Kazaklis, A.
    Merou, Th.
    Takos, I.
    [J]. MODELLING, VALUING AND MANAGING MEDITERRANEAN FOREST ECOSYSTEMS FOR NON-TIMBER GOODS AND SERVICES, 2009, (57): : 175 - 184
  • [23] Institutional Capacity of Forest Management Unit in Promoting Sustainable Community-Based Forest Management. Case Study of Forest Management Unit in Central Sulawesi Province, Indonesia
    Massiri, Sudirman Daeng
    Malik, Adam
    Golar
    Hamzari
    Nugroho, Bramasto
    [J]. JURNAL MANAJEMEN HUTAN TROPIKA, 2020, 26 (02): : 169 - 177
  • [24] Field testing of a criteria and indicators system for sustainable forest management at the local level. Case study results concerning the sustainability of the private forest Haliburton Forest and Wild Life Reserve in Ontario, Canada
    Mrosek, Thorsten
    Balsillie, David
    Schleifenbaum, Peter
    [J]. FOREST POLICY AND ECONOMICS, 2006, 8 (06) : 593 - 609
  • [25] Merits and Limitations of Element Balances as a Forest Planning Tool for Harvest Intensities and Sustainable Nutrient Management-A Case Study from Germany
    Ahrends, Bernd
    von Wilpert, Klaus
    Weis, Wendelin
    Vonderach, Christian
    Kandler, Gerald
    Zirlewagen, Dietmar
    Sucker, Carina
    Puhlmann, Heike
    [J]. SOIL SYSTEMS, 2022, 6 (02)
  • [26] Community based forest management and its impact on vegetation: a case study
    Kumar, P. G.
    Hate, S.
    Chaturvedi, A.
    [J]. IFOREST-BIOGEOSCIENCES AND FORESTRY, 2009, 2 : 93 - 98
  • [27] Victorian Ecologically Sustainable Forest Management: Part IV - A Case Study of Current Regulation of Victorian State Forest Harvesting
    Martin, Rhett
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL AND PLANNING LAW JOURNAL, 2019, 36 (01): : 57 - 79
  • [28] Risk Aversion and Timber Harvest Strategies: A Case Study of Nonindustrial Private Forest Management in Louisiana
    Wang, Hua
    Adusumilli, Naveen
    Blazier, Michael
    Pathak, Santosh
    [J]. SMALL-SCALE FORESTRY, 2022, 21 (02) : 275 - 295
  • [29] Risk Aversion and Timber Harvest Strategies: A Case Study of Nonindustrial Private Forest Management in Louisiana
    Hua Wang
    Naveen Adusumilli
    Michael Blazier
    Santosh Pathak
    [J]. Small-scale Forestry, 2022, 21 : 275 - 295
  • [30] Quantifying the research impact of the Sustainable Forest Management Network in the social sciences: a bibliometric study
    Klenk, Nicole L.
    Dabros, Anna
    Hickey, Gordon M.
    [J]. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF FOREST RESEARCH-REVUE CANADIENNE DE RECHERCHE FORESTIERE, 2010, 40 (11): : 2248 - 2255