Fault-Tolerance in the Scope of Software-Defined Networking (SDN)

被引：26

作者：

Rehman, A. U. ^{[1
]}

Aguiar, Rui L. ^{[1
]}

Barraca, Joao Paulo ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Inst Telecomunicacoes, P-3810193 Aveiro, Portugal

来源：

IEEE ACCESS | 2019年 / 7卷

关键词：

Software-defined networking; fault-tolerance; OpenFlow; failure detection; failure recovery; fault-tolerance issues; network programmability; network softwarization; mission-critical communications; CONTROLLER PLACEMENT; OPENFLOW; MANAGEMENT; PROGRAMMABILITY; VIRTUALIZATION; SCALABILITY; COMPONENT; SUPPORT;

D O I：

10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2939115

中图分类号：

TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];

学科分类号：

0812 ;

摘要：

Fault-tolerance is an essential aspect of network resilience. Fault-tolerance mechanisms are required to ensure high availability and high reliability in systems. The advent of software-defined networking (SDN) has both presented new challenges and opened new paths to develop novel strategies, architectures, and standards to support fault-tolerance. In this survey, we address SDN fault-tolerance and discuss the OpenFlow fault-tolerance support for failure recovery. We highlight the mechanism used for failure recovery in Carrier-grade networks that includes detection and recovery phases. Furthermore, we highlight SDN-specific fault-tolerance issues and provide a comprehensive overview of the state-of-the-art SDN fault-tolerance research efforts. We then discuss and structure SDN fault-tolerance research according to three distinct SDN planes (i.e., data, control, and application). Finally, we conclude enumerating future research directions for SDN fault-tolerance development.

引用

页码：124474 / 124490

页数：17

共 50 条

[31] Software-Defined Networking (SDN)-Based Network Services for Smart Learning Environment
Govindarajan, Kannan
Kumar, Vivekanandan Suresh
Boulanger, David
Seanosky, Jeremie
Bell, Jason
Pinnell, Colin
Kinshuk
Somasundaram, Thamarai Selvi
[J]. STATE-OF-THE-ART AND FUTURE DIRECTIONS OF SMART LEARNING, 2016, : 69 - 76
[32] Software-Defined Networking (SDN) based VANET Architecture: Mitigation of Traffic Congestion
Adbeb, Tesfanesh
Di, Wu
Ibrar, Muhammad
[J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVANCED COMPUTER SCIENCE AND APPLICATIONS, 2020, 11 (03) : 706 - 714
[33] Status of address spoofing attack prevention techniques in software-defined networking (SDN)
Meena, Ramesh Chand
Meena, Keshav
Kumar, Ankit
Gupta, Mukesh
Kumar, Santosh
[J]. JOURNAL OF DISCRETE MATHEMATICAL SCIENCES & CRYPTOGRAPHY, 2021, 24 (08): : 2341 - 2351
[34] Comprehensive Survey on T-SDN: Software-Defined Networking for Transport Networks
Alvizu, Rodolfo
Maier, Guido
Kukreja, Navin
Pattavina, Achille
Morro, Roberto
Capello, Alessandro
Cavazzoni, Carlo
[J]. IEEE COMMUNICATIONS SURVEYS AND TUTORIALS, 2017, 19 (04): : 2232 - 2283
[35] Mitigating ARP Cache Poisoning Attack in Software-Defined Networking (SDN): A Survey
Shah, Zawar
Cosgrove, Steve
[J]. ELECTRONICS, 2019, 8 (10)
[36] Software-Defined Networking (SDN) Control Message Classification, Verification, and Optimization System
Park, Hyungbae
Song, Sejun
Choi, Baek-Young
Zhu, Henry
[J]. 2015 IEEE INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON SOFTWARE RELIABILITY ENGINEERING WORKSHOPS (ISSREW), 2015, : 25 - 28
[37] A Literature Review on Software-Defined Networking (SDN) Research Topics, Challenges and Solutions
Govindarajan, Kannan
Meng, Kong Chee
Ong, Hong
[J]. 2013 FIFTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ADVANCED COMPUTING (ICOAC), 2013, : 293 - 299
[38] A survey: Control plane scalability issues and approaches in Software-Defined Networking (SDN)
Karakus, Murat
Durresi, Arjan
[J]. COMPUTER NETWORKS, 2017, 112 : 279 - 293
[39] Analysis of Realizing a Future Industrial Network by Means of Software-Defined Networking (SDN)
Henneke, Dominik
Wisniewski, Lukasz
Jasperneite, Juergen
[J]. 2016 IEEE WORLD CONFERENCE ON FACTORY COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS (WFCS), 2016,
[40] Performance Evaluation Using RYU SDN Controller in Software-Defined Networking Environment
Bhardwaj, Shanu
Panda, S. N.
[J]. WIRELESS PERSONAL COMMUNICATIONS, 2022, 122 (01) : 701 - 723

← 1 2 3 4 5 →