The influence of privacy dispositions on perceptions of information transparency and personalization preferences

被引:0
|
作者
Hauff, Sabrina [1 ]
Dytynko, Olga [1 ]
Veit, Daniel [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
关键词
ONLINE; IMPACT; ADOPTION; PARADOX; RECOMMENDATION; COMMUNICATION; WILLINGNESS; FAMILIARITY; INTENTIONS; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TP301 [理论、方法];
学科分类号
081202 ;
摘要
To attract customers, firms offer personalized services. This is perceived beneficial by many customers as it enhances the purchase experience and addresses customers' needs. However, to offer personalized services, customer data has to be collected and analyzed. This practice gives rise to privacy concerns and can inhibit the usage of such services. Our research aims to address the tension between personalization and privacy by applying information boundary theory to investigate how respondents' disposition to value privacy and the availability of information transparency features influences individuals' intention to disclose information to personalized services. Based on an experimental study, we find a significant interaction between disposition to value privacy and personalization, while the implementation of transparency features does not yield substantial changes in information disclosure. Thus, in order to successfully offer personalized services, we recommend that practitioners take individuals' privacy preferences into account for their service design.
引用
收藏
页码:5006 / 5015
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The personalization privacy paradox: An empirical evaluation of information transparency and the willingness to be profiled online for personalization
    Awad, NF
    Krishnan, MS
    [J]. MIS QUARTERLY, 2006, 30 (01) : 13 - 28
  • [2] Beyond the Personalization-Privacy Paradox: Privacy Valuation, Transparency Features, and Service Personalization
    Karwatzki, Sabrina
    Dytynko, Olga
    Trenz, Manuel
    Veit, Daniel
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 2017, 34 (02) : 369 - 400
  • [3] Investigating Perceptions of Personalization and Privacy in India
    Schneider, Hanna
    George, Ceenu
    Eiband, Malin
    Lachner, Florian
    [J]. HUMAN-COMPUTER INTERACTION - INTERACT 2017, PT IV, 2017, 10516 : 488 - 491
  • [4] Adaptive information access: Personalization and privacy
    Smyth, Barry
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PATTERN RECOGNITION AND ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2007, 21 (02) : 183 - 205
  • [5] Privacy and Personalization Perceptions of the Indian Demographic with respect to Online Searches
    Punagin, Saraswathi
    Arya, Arti
    [J]. PROCEEDING OF THE THIRD INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON WOMEN IN COMPUTING AND INFORMATICS (WCI-2015), 2015, : 136 - 142
  • [6] Sharing Personal Health Information: Personalization versus Privacy
    Jena, Rishikesh
    [J]. AMCIS 2015 PROCEEDINGS, 2015,
  • [7] Personalization-Privacy Tradeoffs in Adaptive Information Access
    Smyth, Barry
    [J]. PERSONALIZATION TECHNIQUES AND RECOMMENDER SYSTEMS, 2008, : 3 - 31
  • [8] Impact of personalization and privacy concerns on information disclosure and pricing
    Chen, Chen
    Duan, Yongrui
    [J]. JOURNAL OF RETAILING AND CONSUMER SERVICES, 2022, 69
  • [9] A Design Theory for Transparency of Information Privacy Practices
    Dehling, Tobias
    Sunyaev, Ali
    [J]. INFORMATION SYSTEMS RESEARCH, 2023, 35 (03) : 956 - 977
  • [10] A tripartite model of trust in Facebook: acceptance of information personalization, privacy concern, and privacy literacy
    Rosenthal, Sonny
    Wasenden, Ole-Christian
    Gronnevet, Gorm-Andreas
    Ling, Rich
    [J]. MEDIA PSYCHOLOGY, 2020, 23 (06) : 840 - 864