A tripartite model of trust in Facebook: acceptance of information personalization, privacy concern, and privacy literacy

被引:18
|
作者
Rosenthal, Sonny [1 ]
Wasenden, Ole-Christian [2 ]
Gronnevet, Gorm-Andreas [2 ]
Ling, Rich [1 ]
机构
[1] Nanyang Technol Univ, Wee Kim Wee Sch Commun & Informat, Singapore, Singapore
[2] Telenor Grp, Telenor Res, Fornebu, Norway
关键词
INSTITUTIONAL TRUST; ONLINE; PARADOX; USERS; INTERNET; EXPERIENCE; GOVERNMENT; INTENTION; ATTITUDES; COGNITION;
D O I
10.1080/15213269.2019.1648218
中图分类号
G2 [信息与知识传播];
学科分类号
05 ; 0503 ;
摘要
This study draws on the mental accounting perspective and a tripartite model of trust to explain why users trust Facebook. We argue that trust in Facebook is related to (1) trust in companies that collect personal data, (2) acceptance of information personalization, (3) low privacy concern, and (4) low privacy literacy. Further, we argue that privacy literacy amplifies the relationship between privacy concern and the other factors. This is because, among individuals with high privacy literacy, privacy concern is especially diagnostic of the potential harms of a loss of privacy. These arguments align broadly with theorizations about factors influencing privacy-related cognitions. We analyzed cross-national survey data from 4,684 mobile internet users and found support for our predictions. Our findings suggest that privacy concern has a weak relationship with trust-related beliefs except for among individuals with good privacy literacy. Among those individuals, privacy concern is negatively related to trust, potentially threatening an important revenue stream to data-driven companies, especially amid growing calls for privacy literacy education.
引用
收藏
页码:840 / 864
页数:25
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Privacy concern and online personalization: The moderating effects of information control and compensation
    David G. Taylor
    Donna F. Davis
    Ravi Jillapalli
    [J]. Electronic Commerce Research, 2009, 9 : 203 - 223
  • [2] Privacy concern and online personalization: the moderating effects of information control and compensation
    Taylor, David G.
    Davis, Donna F.
    Jillapalli, Ravi
    [J]. ELECTRONIC COMMERCE RESEARCH, 2009, 9 (03) : 203 - 223
  • [3] Age differences in privacy attitudes, literacy and privacy management on Facebook
    Kezer, Murat
    Sevi, Baris
    Cemalcilar, Zeynep
    Baruh, Lemi
    [J]. CYBERPSYCHOLOGY-JOURNAL OF PSYCHOSOCIAL RESEARCH ON CYBERSPACE, 2016, 10 (01):
  • [4] The effect of online privacy policy on consumer privacy concern and trust
    Wu, Kuang-Wen
    Huang, Shaio Yan
    Yen, David C.
    Popova, Irina
    [J]. COMPUTERS IN HUMAN BEHAVIOR, 2012, 28 (03) : 889 - 897
  • [5] The roles of trust, personalization, loss of privacy, and anthropomorphism in public acceptance of smart healthcare services
    Liu, Kaifeng
    Tao, Da
    [J]. COMPUTERS IN HUMAN BEHAVIOR, 2022, 127
  • [6] Supporting Privacy, Trust, and Personalization in Online Learning
    Mohd Anwar
    [J]. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 2021, 31 : 769 - 783
  • [7] Supporting Privacy, Trust, and Personalization in Online Learning
    Anwar, Mohd
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN EDUCATION, 2021, 31 (04) : 769 - 783
  • [8] Adaptive information access: Personalization and privacy
    Smyth, Barry
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PATTERN RECOGNITION AND ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2007, 21 (02) : 183 - 205
  • [9] A Survey on Facebook Users and Information Privacy
    Presthus, Wanda
    Vatne, Dina Marie
    [J]. CENTERIS2019--INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ENTERPRISE INFORMATION SYSTEMS/PROJMAN2019--INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON PROJECT MANAGEMENT/HCIST2019--INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON HEALTH AND SOCIAL CARE INFORMATION SYSTEMS AND TECHNOLOGIES, 2019, 164 : 39 - 47
  • [10] Antecedents of privacy concern: the examination of "self" and "others" on Facebook
    Lee, Danielle Ka Lai
    Xiao, Xizhu
    Borah, Porismita
    [J]. ATLANTIC JOURNAL OF COMMUNICATION, 2023, 31 (01) : 1 - 13