Robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: First 100 patients with one year of follow-up

被引:54
|
作者
Mikhail, Albert A. [1 ]
Orvieto, Marcelo A. [1 ]
Billatos, Ehab S. [1 ]
Zorn, Kevin C. [1 ]
Gong, Edward M. [1 ]
Brendler, Charles B. [1 ]
Zagaja, Gregory P. [1 ]
Shalhav, Arieh L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Chicago, Pritzker Sch Med, Dept Surg, Urol Sect, Chicago, IL 60738 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.urology.2006.08.1060
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives. To report our initial experience of 100 patients with robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Continued technological advances have expanded our armamentarium of minimally invasive devices and techniques to offer our patients. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy has been adopted at many centers. Methods. This was a nonrandomized prospective study evaluating our initial 100 patients who underwent robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. The follow-up data were obtained prospectively using the validated Rand 36-item health survey, version 2, and the University of California, Los Angeles, Prostate Cancer Index preoperatively and at 1, 3, 6, and 1 2 months postoperatively. Patients who required open conversion were excluded from the outcome analysis. Patients who received a sural nerve graft were excluded from the operative analysis. Results. The average age and body mass index of all patients were 58.4 years (range 42 to 70) and 28.5 kg/m(2) (range 18.1 to 50.6), respectively, with a median follow-up of 12 months. The average prostate-specific antigen level was 6.07 ng/mL. Seven patients required conversion to an open technique, and four underwent sural nerve grafting. The positive surgical margin rate was 16% (15 of 92). Using the Rand 36-item health survey, version 2, and the University of California, Los Angeles, Prostate Cancer Index health surveys, the average percentage of return to baseline urinary function was 52%, 70%, 79%, and 84% at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months, respectively. The overall average percentage of return to baseline sexual function was 51%, 58%, 66%, and 80% at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months, respectively. Conclusions. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy is a safe and efficient method for achieving prostate cancer control even during the initial learning curve for this procedure.
引用
收藏
页码:1275 / 1279
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Operative Details and Oncological and Functional Outcome of Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy: 400 Cases with a Minimum of 12 Months Follow-up
    Murphy, Declan G.
    Kerger, Michael
    Crowe, Helen
    Peters, Justin S.
    Costello, Anthony J.
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2009, 55 (06) : 1358 - 1367
  • [32] Robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical cystectomy: Short-term clinical and oncologic follow-up
    Pearson, Matthew
    Nix, Jeffrey
    Wallen, Eric
    Pruthi, Raj
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2008, 207 (03) : S111 - S111
  • [33] Laparoscopic robotic-assisted management of pelvi-ureteric junction obstruction in patients with horseshoe kidneys: technique and 1-year follow-up
    Chammas, M
    Feuillu, B
    Coissard, A
    Hubert, J
    [J]. BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2006, 97 (03) : 579 - 583
  • [34] Tension and energy-free robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy with lateral dissection dissection of the neurovascular bundles: 1 year follow up
    Naspro, R.
    Mattei, A.
    Annino, F.
    Piechaud, T.
    Gaston, R.
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY SUPPLEMENTS, 2008, 7 (03) : 250 - 250
  • [35] Oncological Safety of Robotic-Assisted Comparative To Laparoscopic Rectal Cancer Resections At 3 Year Follow Up
    Connell, L. O.
    Nugent, T.
    Kalbassi, Reza
    Neary, Paul
    Hafeez, Adnan
    O'Riordain, Diarmuid
    [J]. IRISH JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2021, 190 (SUPPL 6) : S254 - S254
  • [36] Robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: What is the learning curve?
    Herrell, SD
    Smith, JA
    [J]. UROLOGY, 2005, 66 (5A) : 105 - 107
  • [37] Radical Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopic Prostatectomy: A Daycase Procedure
    Goonewardene, Sanchia S.
    Rowe, Edward W.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF LAPAROENDOSCOPIC & ADVANCED SURGICAL TECHNIQUES, 2014, 24 (11): : 804 - 805
  • [38] Predictors of costs for robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy
    Bolenz, Christian
    Gupta, Amit
    Roehrborn, Claus G.
    Lotan, Yair
    [J]. UROLOGIC ONCOLOGY-SEMINARS AND ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2011, 29 (03) : 325 - 329
  • [39] ROBOTIC-ASSISTED LAPAROSCOPIC RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY: TIPS AND TRICKS
    Palmer, K. J.
    Chauhan, S.
    Coelho, R. Ferreira
    Rocco, B.
    Coughlin, G.
    Patel, V.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2009, 23 : A384 - A384
  • [40] Current role of salvage robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy
    D. Wetherell
    D. Bolton
    L. Kavanagh
    M. Perera
    [J]. World Journal of Urology, 2013, 31 : 463 - 469