Have China's pilot emissions trading schemes promoted carbon emission reductions?- the evidence from industrial sub-sectors at the provincial level

被引:133
|
作者
Zhang, Haijun [1 ,2 ]
Duan, Maosheng [1 ,2 ]
Deng, Zhe [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Tsinghua Univ, Inst Energy Environm & Econ, Beijing 100084, Peoples R China
[2] Tsinghua Univ, China Carbon Market Res Ctr, Beijing 100084, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Emissions trading scheme; China; Causal impact; Carbon emission reduction; CAP-AND-TRADE; CO2; EMISSIONS; POWER INDUSTRY; CLIMATE POLICY; IMPACT; DECOMPOSITION; MARKET; ETS; COORDINATION; INNOVATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.06.247
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Scholars and policy makers put great emphasis on analyzing the mitigation effect of an emissions trading scheme (ETS), while empirical researches on the mitigation effects of China's pilot ETSs are both thin and with significant limitations. This paper tries to analyze this issue from the perspective of industrial subsectors at the provincial level. We first calculate the carbon emissions of 37 individual industrial subsectors in each of China's 26 provinces from 2005 to 2015, covering both direct and indirect emissions. Cautiously identifying the industrial sub-sectors covered by China's pilot ETSs, we explore the causal impact of China's pilot ETSs on reducing carbon emissions at the initial stage (2013-2015) and analyze the paths of achieved emission reductions, applying a difference-in-difference (DID) model and a combination of DID estimator and propensity score matching technique. Our results yield robust evidence that China's pilot ETSs have significantly promoted carbon emission reductions of the covered industrial sub-sectors, and this impact has presented an overall enhanced trend according to year-by-year analysis. The results also show that the pilot ETSs have failed to enable covered industrial subsectors to effectively cut carbon intensity and the impact on carbon intensity is not obvious in any of the first three years, and the carbon emission reductions have mainly been achieved through the decreased outputs of industrial sub-sectors. China's policy makers should tighten the free allowance allocation approaches in order to facilitate low-carbon technology innovations and reduce carbon intensity of industrial sectors. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:912 / 924
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Will carbon emission trading scheme affect industrial investment? Evidence from China's listed companies
    Zheng, Haotian
    Zhang, Caiyun
    Zhang, Xiaoxi
    APPLIED ECONOMICS, 2024,
  • [32] Carbon emission efficiency of China's industry sectors: From the perspective of embodied carbon emissions
    Gao, Peng
    Yue, Shujing
    Chen, Hongtao
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2021, 283
  • [33] Structural, Innovation and Efficiency Effects of Environmental Regulation: Evidence from China’s Carbon Emissions Trading Pilot
    Cenjie Liu
    Chunbo Ma
    Rui Xie
    Environmental and Resource Economics, 2020, 75 : 741 - 768
  • [34] Structural, Innovation and Efficiency Effects of Environmental Regulation: Evidence from China's Carbon Emissions Trading Pilot
    Liu, Cenjie
    Ma, Chunbo
    Xie, Rui
    ENVIRONMENTAL & RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 2020, 75 (04): : 741 - 768
  • [35] Market potential and the industrial sectors inclusion sequence in China's national carbon emission trading: From the perspective of maximizing gains
    Xian, Yujiao
    Li, Nan
    Zhao, Mengzhen
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2024, 435
  • [36] Is China's carbon trading market efficient? Evidence from emissions trading scheme pilots
    Wang, Xiao-Qing
    Su, Chi-Wei
    Lobont, Oana-Ramona
    Li, Hao
    Nicoleta-Claudia, Moldovan
    ENERGY, 2022, 245
  • [37] Empirical analysis of the impact of China’s carbon emissions trading policy using provincial-level data
    Jiang X.
    Xu W.
    Du L.
    Energy Informatics, 2024, 7 (01)
  • [38] Emission reductions, industrial competitiveness, and spillover effects under China's regional emission trading systems: Evidence from the iron and steel sector
    Quan, Yifei
    Duan, Maosheng
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2023, 344
  • [39] Market incentives, carbon quota allocation and carbon emission reduction: Evidence from China's carbon trading pilot policy
    Shi, Beibei
    Li, Nan
    Gao, Qiang
    Li, Guangqin
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2022, 319
  • [40] Can carbon emission trading pilot policy drive industrial structure low-carbon restructuring: new evidence from China
    Shen, Bing
    Yang, Xiaodong
    Xu, Yang
    Ge, Wenfeng
    Liu, Guangliang
    Su, Xufeng
    Zhao, Shikuan
    Dagestani, Abd Alwahed
    Ran, Qiying
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2023, 30 (14) : 41553 - 41569