Economic Structure of Quince Farms in Turkey

被引:0
|
作者
Sirikci, Bekir Sitki [1 ]
Gul, Mevlut [1 ]
机构
[1] Isparta Univ Appl Sci, Fac Agirculture, Dept Agr Econ, Isparta, Turkey
来源
ERWERBS-OBSTBAU | 2019年 / 61卷 / 03期
关键词
Quince; Costs; Profitability; Turkey;
D O I
10.1007/s10341-019-00422-8
中图分类号
S6 [园艺];
学科分类号
0902 ;
摘要
The aim of this study was to determine the cost and profitability of quince cultivation. Sakarya, Bursa, Antalya, Bilecik and Denizli were the main materials of the research and data were provided from quince farmers in districts and villages where quince farming was intensively performed. The data were obtained from 204 farmers surveyed. The research area constituted 70.2% of the total quince production of Turkey in 2015. The data used in the research belonged to the 2014 production period. Production cost was calculated as 43898.22 TRL in the average of farmers and 2965.11 TRL per decare (0.1ha) in the quince production activity. The average cost per 1kg was 0.78 TRL, the sales price was 1.33 TRL/kg and the profit margin was 0.56 TRL/kg. The gross production value of the quince farms was calculated as 5082.91 TRL in the average for a decare. Absolute profit was determined as 1936.36 TRL for a decare and relative profit was 1.71. There was an increase with TRL112.70 in the absolute profit with the support of government to the farmers. And the relative profit was increased by 0.04 units. The most important cost element in quince farms was marketing. Suggestions for reducing this cost are the provision of producer organization, the increase in the number of cold stores, and therefore the use of cold stores with lower costs. It is important that it should provide various incentives to establish quince processing facilities for entrepreneurs and the support provided should be presented to more special products for the positive effects of the quince production on sustainability and profitability indicators.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:237 / 244
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Economic analysis of sheep farms: a case study from eastern part of Turkey
    Deniz, Ahmet
    Yildirim, Ibrahim
    Ciftci, Kenan
    CUSTOS E AGRONEGOCIO ON LINE, 2020, 16 (04): : 389 - 403
  • [22] TURKEY STUD FARMS
    BERBERICH, S
    AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH, 1985, 33 (05) : 6 - 9
  • [23] Determination of effective factors and profitability on quince farmers in Turkey
    Sirikci, Bekir Sitki
    Gul, Mevlut
    CUSTOS E AGRONEGOCIO ON LINE, 2021, 17 (02): : 310 - 325
  • [24] Evaluation of Economic Structure of Cherry Growing in Turkey
    Gul, Mevlut
    Akpinar, M. Goksel
    Demircan, Vecdi
    Bal, Tufan
    Yilmaz, Hasan
    Arici, Serife Evrim
    Polat, Mehmet
    Ormeci Kart, Murside Cagla
    Acar, Musa
    ERWERBS-OBSTBAU, 2020, 62 (01): : 13 - 20
  • [25] Measuring environmental, economic, and social sustainability index of tea farms in Rize Province, Turkey
    ul Haq, Shamsheer
    Boz, Ismet
    ENVIRONMENT DEVELOPMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY, 2020, 22 (03) : 2545 - 2567
  • [26] The comparative economic analysis of potato production on farms and the role of the producers in the marketing system in Turkey
    Tanrivermis, H.
    Sanli, H.
    Bulbul, M.
    POTATO PRODUCTION AND INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGIES, 2007, : 70 - 89
  • [27] Measuring environmental, economic, and social sustainability index of tea farms in Rize Province, Turkey
    Shamsheer ul Haq
    Ismet Boz
    Environment, Development and Sustainability, 2020, 22 : 2545 - 2567
  • [28] DESCRIPTION OF SOME QUINCE CULTIVARS FROM WESTERN-TURKEY
    SYKES, JT
    ECONOMIC BOTANY, 1972, 26 (01) : 21 - 31
  • [29] Morphological and Molecular Characterization of Major Quince Cultivars from Turkey
    Pinar, Hasan
    Kaymak, Suat
    Ozongun, Serif
    Uzun, Aydin
    Unlu, Mustafa
    Bircan, Mustafa
    Ercisli, Sezai
    Orhan, Emine
    NOTULAE BOTANICAE HORTI AGROBOTANICI CLUJ-NAPOCA, 2016, 44 (01) : 72 - 76
  • [30] Determinants of economic efficiency: a case study of hazelnut (Corylus avellana) farms in Samsun Province, Turkey
    Kilic, Osman
    Ceyhan, Vedat
    Alkan, Isil
    NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF CROP AND HORTICULTURAL SCIENCE, 2009, 37 (03) : 263 - 270