Development of machine learning models for diagnosis of glaucoma

被引:155
|
作者
Kim, Seong Jae [1 ]
Cho, Kyong Jin [2 ]
Oh, Sejong [3 ]
机构
[1] Gyeongsang Natl Univ, Coll Med, Dept Ophthalmol, Jinju, South Korea
[2] Dankook Univ, Coll Med, Dept Ophthalmol, Cheonan, South Korea
[3] Dankook Univ, Dept Software Sci, Yongin, South Korea
来源
PLOS ONE | 2017年 / 12卷 / 05期
关键词
FIBER LAYER MEASUREMENTS; OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY; DETECTION ABILITY; CLASSIFIERS; THICKNESS; MYOPIA; SENSITIVITY;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0177726
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
The study aimed to develop machine learning models that have strong prediction power and interpretability for diagnosis of glaucoma based on retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness and visual field (VF). We collected various candidate features from the examination of retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness and visual field (VF). We also developed synthesized features from original features. We then selected the best features proper for classification (diagnosis) through feature evaluation. We used 100 cases of data as a test dataset and 399 cases of data as a training and validation dataset. To develop the glaucoma prediction model, we considered four machine learning algorithms: C5.0, random forest (RF), support vector machine (SVM), and k-nearest neighbor (KNN). We repeatedly composed a learning model using the training dataset and evaluated it by using the validation dataset. Finally, we got the best learning model that produces the highest validation accuracy. We analyzed quality of the models using several measures. The random forest model shows best performance and C5.0, SVM, and KNN models show similar accuracy. In the random forest model, the classification accuracy is 0.98, sensitivity is 0.983, specificity is 0.975, and AUC is 0.979. The developed prediction models show high accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and AUC in classifying among glaucoma and healthy eyes. It will be used for predicting glaucoma against unknown examination records. Clinicians may reference the prediction results and be able to make better decisions. We may combine multiple learning models to increase prediction accuracy. The C5.0 model includes decision rules for prediction. It can be used to explain the reasons for specific predictions.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Sensitivity and specificity of machine learning classifiers and spectral domain OCT for the diagnosis of glaucoma
    Vidotti, Vanessa G.
    Costa, Vital P.
    Silva, Fabricio R.
    Resende, Graziela M.
    Cremasco, Fernanda
    Dias, Marcelo
    Gomi, Edson S.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2013, 23 (01) : 61 - 69
  • [22] A Framework for Glaucoma Diagnosis Prediction Using Retinal Thickness Using Machine Learning
    Maram, Balajee
    Sahukari, Jitendra
    Lokesh, Tandra
    [J]. SMART TECHNOLOGIES FOR POWER AND GREEN ENERGY, STPGE 2022, 2023, 443 : 61 - 77
  • [23] Comparison of Different Machine Learning Classifiers for Glaucoma Diagnosis Based on Spectralis OCT
    Wu, Chao-Wei
    Shen, Hsiang-Li
    Lu, Chi-Jie
    Chen, Ssu-Han
    Chen, Hsin-Yi
    [J]. DIAGNOSTICS, 2021, 11 (09)
  • [24] Developing Models of Glaucoma Clinical Decision Making Using Machine Learning Algorithms
    Oke, Isdin
    Eliassi-Rad, Babak
    Desai, Manishi
    [J]. INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2019, 60 (09)
  • [25] Automated Glaucoma Detection in Retinal Fundus Images Using Machine Learning Models
    Hegde, Nagaratna P.
    Sireesha, V.
    Kumar, S. Vinay
    Madarapu, Sathwika
    Thupakula, Sai Varshini
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ELECTRICAL SYSTEMS, 2023, 19 (04) : 298 - 314
  • [26] Analysis of oral microbiome in glaucoma patients using machine learning prediction models
    Yoon, Byung Woo
    Lim, Su-Ho
    Shin, Jong Hoon
    Lee, Ji-Woong
    Lee, Young
    Seo, Je Hyun
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ORAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2021, 13 (01)
  • [27] Comparison of ischemic stroke diagnosis models based on machine learning
    Yang, Wan-Xia
    Wang, Fang-Fang
    Pan, Yun-Yan
    Xie, Jian-Qin
    Lu, Ming-Hua
    You, Chong-Ge
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN NEUROLOGY, 2022, 13
  • [28] Machine Learning-Based Classification Models for Diagnosis of Diabetes
    Jaiswal, Sushma
    Jaiswal, Tarun
    [J]. Recent Advances in Computer Science and Communications, 2022, 15 (06) : 813 - 821
  • [29] Supervised machine learning models applied to disease diagnosis and prognosis
    Mariani, Maria C.
    Tweneboah, Osei K.
    Bhuiyan, Md Al Masum
    [J]. AIMS PUBLIC HEALTH, 2019, 6 (04): : 405 - 423
  • [30] Explainable machine learning models for early gastric cancer diagnosis
    Du, Hongyang
    Yang, Qingfen
    Ge, Aimin
    Zhao, Chenhao
    Ma, Yunhua
    Wang, Shuyu
    [J]. SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2024, 14 (01):