Aerosol concentrations and size distributions during clinical dental procedures

被引:12
|
作者
Lahdentausta, Laura [1 ,2 ]
Sanmark, Enni [3 ]
Lauretsalo, Saku [1 ,2 ]
Korkee, Verneri [1 ,2 ]
Nyman, Sini [2 ]
Atanasova, Nina [4 ,5 ]
Oksanen, Lotta [3 ]
Zhao, Jiangyue [6 ]
Hussein, Tareq [7 ,8 ]
Hyvarinen, Antti [5 ]
Paju, Susanna [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Helsinki, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Dis, FI-00014 Helsinki, Finland
[2] Helsinki Univ Hosp, FI-00014 Helsinki, Finland
[3] Helsinki Univ Hosp, Dept Otorhinolaryngol & Phoniatr Head & Neck Surg, FI-00029 Helsinki, Finland
[4] Univ Helsinki, Fac Biol & Environm Sci, Mol & Integrat Biosci, Helsinki, Finland
[5] Finnish Meteorol Inst, Helsinki, Finland
[6] Fraunhofer WKI, Mat Anal & Indoor Chem, Braunschweig, Germany
[7] Univ Jordan, Sch Sci, Dept Phys, Environm & Atmospher Res Lab EARL, Amman 11942, Jordan
[8] Univ Helsinki, Inst Atmospher & Earth Syst Res INAR Phys, UHEL, FI-00014 Helsinki, Finland
基金
芬兰科学院;
关键词
Dental aerosol; Air turbine handpiece; High-and low-speed dental handpiece; Ultrasonic scaler; Optical particle sizer;
D O I
10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e11074
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Background: Suspected aerosol-generating dental instruments may cause risks for operators by transmitting pathogens, such as the SARS-CoV-2 virus. The aim of our study was to measure aerosol generation in various dental procedures in clinical settings.Methods: The study population comprised of 84 patients who underwent 253 different dental procedures measured with Optical Particle Sizer in a dental office setting. Aerosol particles from 0.3 to 10 mu m in diameter were measured. Dental procedures included oral examinations (N = 52), restorative procedures with air turbine handpiece (N = 8), high-speed (N = 6) and low-speed (N = 30) handpieces, ultrasonic scaling (N = 31), peri-odontal treatment using hand instruments (N = 60), endodontic treatment (N = 12), intraoral radiographs (N = 24), and dental local anesthesia (N = 31).Results: Air turbine handpieces significantly elevated <1 mu m particle median (p = 0.013) and maximum (p = 0.016) aerosol number concentrations as well as aerosol particle mass concentrations (p = 0.046 and p = 0.006) compared to the background aerosol levels preceding the operation. Low-speed dental handpieces elevated >5 mu m median (p = 0.023), maximum (p = 0.013) particle number concentrations,> 5 mu m particle mass concentrations (p = 0.021) and maximum total particle mass concentrations (p = 0.022). High-speed dental handpieces elevated aerosol concentration levels compared to the levels produced during oral examination.Conclusions: Air turbine handpieces produced the highest levels of <1 mu m aerosols and total particle number concentrations when compared to the other commonly used instruments. In addition, high-and low-speed dental handpieces and ultrasonic scalers elevated the aerosol concentration levels compared to the aerosol levels measured during oral examination. These aerosol-generating procedures, involving air turbine, high-and low -speed handpiece, and ultrasonic scaler, should be performed with caution.Clinical significance: Aerosol generating dental instruments, especially air turbine, should be used with adequate precautions (rubber dam, high-volume evacuation, FFP-respirators), because aerosols can cause a potential risk for operators and substitution of air turbine for high-speed dental handpiece in poor epidemic situations should be considered to reduce the risk of aerosol transmission.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] AIR ACTIVITY CONCENTRATIONS AND PARTICLE-SIZE DISTRIBUTIONS OF THE CHERNOBYL AEROSOL
    REINEKING, A
    BECKER, KH
    PORSTENDORFER, J
    WICKE, A
    RADIATION PROTECTION DOSIMETRY, 1987, 19 (03) : 159 - 163
  • [13] Concentrations and size distributions of aerosol particles at Maitri during the passage of cyclonic storms revolving around the continent of Antarctica
    Pant, Vimlesh
    Siingh, Devendraa
    Kamra, A. K.
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 2010, 115
  • [14] Comparing aerosol concentrations and particle size distributions generated by singing, speaking and breathing
    Gregson, Florence K. A.
    Watson, Natalie A.
    Orton, Christopher M.
    Haddrell, Allen E.
    McCarthy, Lauren P.
    Finnie, Thomas J. R.
    Gent, Nick
    Donaldson, Gavin C.
    Shah, Pallav L.
    Calder, James D.
    Bzdek, Bryan R.
    Costello, Declan
    Reid, Jonathan P.
    AEROSOL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2021, 55 (06) : 681 - 691
  • [15] Aerosol size distributions measured at the South Pole during ISCAT
    Park, J
    Sakurai, H
    Vollmers, K
    McMurry, PH
    ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2004, 38 (32) : 5493 - 5500
  • [16] Aerosol Concentrations During Otolaryngology Procedures in a Negative Pressure Isolation Room
    Seresirikachorn, Kachorn
    Sirinara, Patthrarawalai
    Tangjaturonrasme, Napadon
    Panyametheekul, Sirima
    Ngamsritrakul, Thawat
    Supaphan, Uraiwan
    Boonroung, Thirayu
    Ongphichetmetha, Napassorn
    Koosrivinij, Saraporn
    Snidvongs, Kornkiat
    OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD AND NECK SURGERY, 2023, 168 (05) : 1015 - 1024
  • [17] Number concentrations and size distributions of atmospheric aerosol under baseline condition at Cape Grim
    Wiedensohler, A.
    Covert, D.S.
    Journal of Aerosol Science, 1996, 27 (Suppl 1)
  • [18] SHORT-TERM VARIATIONS OF SIZE DISTRIBUTIONS AND CONCENTRATIONS OF ATMOSPHERIC AEROSOL-PARTICLES
    RUOSS, K
    KARG, E
    BRAND, P
    JOURNAL OF AEROSOL SCIENCE, 1991, 22 : S629 - S632
  • [19] Concentrations and size distributions of fine aerosol particles measured at roof level in urban zone
    Despiau, S.
    Croci, D.
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 2007, 112 (D9)
  • [20] Mass size distributions and precursor gas concentrations of major inorganic ions in Antarctic aerosol
    Finnish Meteorological Institute, Air Quality, Sahaajankatu 20 E, FIN-00810 Helsinki, Finland
    不详
    Int. J. Environ. Anal. Chem., 1600, 3-4 (353-372):