Combined SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid amplification testing and respiratory virus panel RT-PCR on the Hologic Panther Fusion system

被引:1
|
作者
Stevens, Bryan A. [1 ,2 ]
Hogan, Catherine A. [1 ,2 ]
Mfuh, Kenji O. [2 ]
Khan, Ghazala [2 ]
Sahoo, Malaya K. [1 ]
Huang, ChunHong [1 ]
Garamani, Natasha [1 ]
Zehnder, James [1 ]
Kurzer, Jason [1 ]
Pinsky, Benjamin A. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Stanford Univ, Sch Med, Dept Pathol, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[2] Stanford Hlth Care, Clin Virol Lab, Stanford, CA USA
[3] Stanford Univ, Sch Med, Dept Med, Div Infect Dis & Geog Med, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
关键词
SARS-CoV-2; Panther Fusion; CLINICAL CHARACTERISTICS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jcv.2021.104792
中图分类号
Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 100705 ;
摘要
Background: Significant overlap exists between the symptoms of SARS-CoV-2 and other respiratory viruses. This poses a serious challenge to clinical diagnosis, laboratory testing, and infection control programs. Objectives: To evaluate the performance of the Hologic Panther Fusion Respiratory Assays (RA) compared to the GenMark ePlex Respiratory Pathogen Panel (RPP) and to assess the ability of the Panther Fusion to perform parallel testing of SARS-CoV-2 and other respiratory viruses from a single sample. Study design: A diagnostic comparison study was carried out using 375 clinical nasopharyngeal specimens. Assay performance was assessed by overall, positive, and negative percent agreement and Cohen's kappa coefficient. Results: Overall agreement between the Fusion RA and ePlex RPP was 97.3 % (95 % CI 96.3-98.0), positive percent agreement was 97.2 % (95 % CI 93.0-99.2), negative percent agreement was 97.3 % (95 % CI 96.3-98.0), and the kappa coefficient was 0.85 (95 % CI 0.81-0.89). Forty additional viruses in 30 specimens were detected by Fusion that were not detected by ePlex. The maximum specimen throughput for parallel testing of the Fusion Respiratory Assays with SARS-CoV-2 was 275 samples in 20.7 h for Fusion SARS-CoV-2 and 350 samples in 20.0 h for Aptima Transcription Mediated Amplification SARS-CoV-2. Conclusion: Fusion RA demonstrated substantial agreement compared to the ePlex RPP. However, the Fusion detected respiratory viruses not identified by ePlex, consistent with higher clinical sensitivity. Workflows for parallel testing of respiratory pathogens and SARS-CoV-2 demonstrate that the Panther Fusion instrument provides a flexible, moderate to high throughput testing option for pandemic and seasonal respiratory viruses.
引用
收藏
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Y The performance of the SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR test as a tool for detecting SARS-CoV-2 infection in the population
    Stang, Andreas
    Robers, Johannes
    Schonert, Birte
    Joeckel, Karl-Heinz
    Spelsberg, Angela
    Keil, Ulrich
    Cullen, Paul
    JOURNAL OF INFECTION, 2021, 83 (02) : 244 - 245
  • [42] Saliva as a testing specimen with or without pooling for SARS-CoV-2 detection by multiplex RT-PCR test
    Sun, Qing
    Li, Jonathan
    Ren, Hui
    Pastor, Larry
    Loginova, Yulia
    Madej, Roberta
    Taylor, Kristopher
    Wong, Joseph K.
    Zhang, Zhao
    Zhang, Aiguo
    Lu, Chuanyi M.
    Sha, Michael Y.
    PLOS ONE, 2021, 16 (02):
  • [43] Comparison of Tracheal vs Nasopharyngeal Secretions for SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR Testing in Patients With Tracheostomy
    Costeloe, Anya
    Samad, Mohammad-Nadim
    Babu, Seilesh
    Metz, Christopher
    OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD AND NECK SURGERY, 2021, 165 (01) : 89 - 92
  • [44] The new normal: a UK fertility clinic experience of universal RT-PCR SARS-CoV-2 testing
    Georgiou, Ektoras X.
    Ryder, Victoria
    Paget, Julia
    Banks, Richard
    Cheong, Ying C.
    HUMAN FERTILITY, 2023, 26 (01) : 127 - 132
  • [45] Development of a protective device for RT-PCR testing SARS-CoV-2 in COVID-19 patients
    Tsuchida, Tomoya
    Fujitani, Shigeki
    Yamasaki, Yukitaka
    Kunishima, Hiroyuki
    Matsuda, Takahide
    INFECTION CONTROL AND HOSPITAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2020, 41 (08): : 975 - 976
  • [46] Development of ViroKey SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR Test v2.0 for the Sensitive and Accurate Automated Detection of the SARS-CoV-2 Virus
    Ng, I.
    Villy, C.
    Han, B.
    Lye, W.
    Suhardi, H.
    Aye, M.
    Kadir, F.
    Aizin, A.
    Dipaola, J.
    Fischer, J.
    Wee, E.
    Lee, C.
    JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR DIAGNOSTICS, 2020, 22 (11): : S29 - S29
  • [47] Evaluation of Using Direct Viral Transport Medium Samples without Nucleic Acid Isolation for SARS-CoV-2 Diagnosis by RT-PCR
    Toptan, Hande
    Koroglu, Mehmet
    Olmez, Mehmet
    Zengin, Mustafa
    Umaroglu, Mumtaz M.
    Karabay, Oguz
    CLINICAL LABORATORY, 2022, : 2213 - 2218
  • [48] Negative preoperative RT-PCR screening is no guaranty of no SARS-CoV-2 infection
    Lippi, G.
    Sanchis-Gomar, F.
    Henry, B. M.
    REVISTA ESPANOLA DE ANESTESIOLOGIA Y REANIMACION, 2023, 70 (02): : 119 - 120
  • [49] An accurate model for SARS-CoV-2 pooled RT-PCR test errors
    Daon, Yair
    Huppert, Amit
    Obolski, Uri
    ROYAL SOCIETY OPEN SCIENCE, 2021, 8 (11):
  • [50] SARS-CoV-2 RNA Quantification Using Droplet Digital RT-PCR
    Kinloch, Natalie N.
    Ritchie, Gordon
    Dong, Winnie
    Cobarrubias, Kyle D.
    Sudderuddin, Hanwei
    Lawson, Tanya
    Matic, Nancy
    Montaner, Julio S. G.
    Leung, Victor
    Romney, Marc G.
    Lowe, Christopher F.
    Brumme, Chanson J.
    Brumme, Zabrina L.
    JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR DIAGNOSTICS, 2021, 23 (08): : 907 - 919