PERCEPTUAL EVALUATION OF SPATIAL AUDIO: WHERE NEXT?

被引:0
|
作者
Francombe, Jon [1 ]
Brookes, Tim [1 ]
Mason, Russell [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Surrey, Inst Sound Recording, Guildford GU2 7XH, Surrey, England
基金
英国工程与自然科学研究理事会;
关键词
MULTICHANNEL REPRODUCED SOUND; QUALITY; ATTRIBUTES;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
O42 [声学];
学科分类号
070206 ; 082403 ;
摘要
From the early days of reproduced sound, engineers have sought to reproduce the spatial properties of sound fields, leading to the development of a range of technologies. Two-channel stereo has been prevalent for many years; however, systems with a higher number of discrete channels (including rear and height loudspeakers) are becoming more common and, recently, there has been a move towards loudspeaker-agnostic methods using audio objects. Perceptual evaluation, and perceptually-informed objective measurement, of alternative reproduction systems can inform further development and steer future innovations. It is important, therefore, that any gaps in the field of perceptual evaluation and measurement are identified and that future work aims to fill those gaps. A standard research paradigm in the field is identification of the perceptual attributes of a stimulus set, facilitating controlled listening tests and leading to the development of predictive models. There have been numerous studies that aim to discover the perceptual attributes of reproduced spatial sound, leading to more than fifty descriptive terms. However, a literature review revealed the following key problems: (i) there is little agreement on exact definitions, nor on the relative importance of each attribute; (ii) there may be important attributes that have not yet been identified (e.g. attributes arising from differences between real and reproduced audio, or pertaining to new 3D or object-based methods); and (iii) there is no model of overall spatial quality based directly on the important attributes. Consequently, the authors contend that future research should focus on: (i) ascertaining which attributes of reproduced spatial audio are most important to listeners; (ii) identifying any important attributes currently missing; (iii) determining the relationships between the important attributes and listener preference; (iv) modelling overall spatial quality in terms of the important perceptual attributes; and (v) modelling these perceptual attributes in terms of their physical correlates.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Spatial Localization Evaluation Model for Parametric Stereo Audio
    You, Shingchern D.
    Cheng, Fan-Yu
    APPLIED MATHEMATICS & INFORMATION SCIENCES, 2012, 6 (02): : 397S - 402S
  • [42] Perceptual Evaluation of Audio-Visual Synchrony Grounded in Viewers' Opinion Scores
    Goncalves, Lucas
    Mathur, Prashant
    Lavania, Chandrashekhar
    Cekic, Metehan
    Federico, Marcello
    Han, Kyu J.
    COMPUTER VISION - ECCV 2024, PT LXXIX, 2025, 15137 : 288 - 305
  • [43] Perceptual Evaluation of Blind Source Separation in Object-Based Audio Production
    Coleman, Philip
    Liu, Qingju
    Francombe, Jon
    Jackson, Philip J. B.
    LATENT VARIABLE ANALYSIS AND SIGNAL SEPARATION (LVA/ICA 2018), 2018, 10891 : 558 - 567
  • [44] Objective Measures of Perceptual Audio Quality Reviewed: An Evaluation of Their Application Domain Dependence
    Torcoli, Matteo
    Kastner, Thorsten
    Herre, Jurgen
    IEEE-ACM TRANSACTIONS ON AUDIO SPEECH AND LANGUAGE PROCESSING, 2021, 29 : 1530 - 1541
  • [45] Integrating Voice Evaluation: Correlation Between Acoustic and Audio-Perceptual Measures
    Freitas, Susana Vaz
    Pestana, Pedro Melo
    Almeida, Vitor
    Ferreira, Anibal
    JOURNAL OF VOICE, 2015, 29 (03) : 390.e1 - 390.e7
  • [46] USING EMOTIONAL NOISE TO UNCLOUD AUDIO-VISUAL EMOTION PERCEPTUAL EVALUATION
    Provost, Emily Mower
    Zhu, Irene
    Narayanan, Shrikanth
    2013 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MULTIMEDIA AND EXPO (ICME 2013), 2013,
  • [47] THE AUDIO PROCESSOR - THE NEXT STEP IN DIGITAL AUDIO
    MOORER, JA
    JOURNAL OF THE AUDIO ENGINEERING SOCIETY, 1982, 30 (7-8): : 542 - 542
  • [48] WHERE TO NEXT
    FIELDS, S
    BYTE, 1989, 14 (04): : 32 - &
  • [49] Where next?
    Newman, JH
    KNEE, 2001, 8 (03): : 177 - 178
  • [50] Where to next?
    Hannifin, J
    ADDICTION, 1997, 92 (06) : 687 - 688