Salvage therapy with single agent bevacizumab for recurrent glioblastoma

被引:100
|
作者
Chamberlain, Marc C. [1 ,2 ]
Johnston, Sandra K. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Washington, Dept Neurol & Neurosurg, Fred Hutchinson Canc Ctr, Seattle, WA 98109 USA
[2] Univ Washington, Dept Neurol & Neurosurg, Fred Hutchinson Canc Res Ctr, Seattle, WA 98109 USA
[3] Univ Washington, Dept Neurol, Div Neurooncol, Fred Hutchinson Canc Res Ctr, Seattle, WA 98109 USA
关键词
Single agent bevacizumab; Radiotherapy refractory; Recurrent glioblastoma; Surgery refractory; Temozolomide refractory; HIGH-GRADE GLIOMAS; GROWTH-FACTOR VEGF; PHASE-II TRIAL; MALIGNANT GLIOMA; VENOUS THROMBOEMBOLISM; RADIATION-THERAPY; ANAPLASTIC ASTROCYTOMA; VASCULAR NORMALIZATION; ANTIANGIOGENIC THERAPY; ADJUVANT CHEMOTHERAPY;
D O I
10.1007/s11060-009-9957-6
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
A retrospective evaluation of single agent bevacizumab in adults with recurrent glioblastoma (GBM) with an objective of determining progression free survival (PFS). There is no standard therapy for recurrent GBM after failure of alkylator-based chemotherapy. A total of 50 adults, ages 36-70 years (median 64), with recurrent GBM were treated. All patients had previously been treated with surgery, concurrent radiotherapy and temozolomide, post-radiotherapy temozolomide and in 34 patients, one salvage regimen (PCV: 21, cyclophosphamide: 13). A total of 13 patients underwent repeat surgery. Patients were treated at first or second recurrence with bevacizumab, once every 2 weeks, defined as a single cycle. Neurological evaluation was performed every 2 weeks and neuroradiographic assessment following the initial 2 cycles of bevacizumab and subsequently after every 4 cycles of bevacizumab. A total of 468 cycles of bevacizumab (median 2 cycles; range 1-30) was administered. Bevacizumab-related toxicity included fatigue (16 patients; 4 grade 3), leukopenia (9; 1 grade 3), anemia (5; 0 grade 3), hypertension (7; 1 grade 3), deep vein thrombosis (4; 1 grade 3) and wound dehiscence (2; 1 grade 3). 21 patients (42%) demonstrated a partial radiographic response and 29 (58%) progressive disease following 1-2 cycles of bevacizumab. Time to tumor progression ranged from 0.5 to 15 months (median: 1.0 months). Survival ranged from 2 to 17 months (median: 8.5 months). 6-month and 12-month PFS were 42% and 22% respectively. Single agent bevacizumab demonstrated efficacy and acceptable toxicity in this cohort of adults with recurrent alkylator-refractory GBM.
引用
收藏
页码:259 / 269
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Valganciclovir and bevacizumab for recurrent glioblastoma: A single-institution experience
    Peng, Chengwei
    Wang, Jialing
    Tanksley, Jarred P.
    Mobley, Bret C.
    Ayers, Gregory D.
    Moots, Paul L.
    Clark, Stephen W.
    MOLECULAR AND CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2016, 4 (02) : 154 - 158
  • [32] Clinical outcomes in recurrent glioblastoma with bevacizumab therapy: An analysis of the literature
    Tipping, Matthew
    Eickhoff, Jens
    Robins, H. Ian
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NEUROSCIENCE, 2017, 44 : 101 - 106
  • [33] Bevacizumab in recurrent glioblastoma multiforme
    Tayah, Tania
    Ashrafieh
    Chahine, Georges Y.
    Kamar, Francois G.
    NEUROLOGY, 2008, 70 (11) : A296 - A297
  • [34] Bevacizumab for the Treatment of Recurrent Glioblastoma
    Chamberlain, Marc C.
    CLINICAL MEDICINE INSIGHTS-ONCOLOGY, 2011, 5 : 117 - 129
  • [35] A randomized phase II study of bevacizumab versus bevacizumab plus lomustine versus lomustine single agent in recurrent glioblastoma: The Dutch BELOB study
    Taal, Walter
    Oosterkamp, Hendrika M.
    Walenkamp, Annemiek M. E.
    Beerepoot, Laurens Victor
    Hanse, Monique
    Buter, J.
    Honkoop, Aafke
    Boerman, Dolf
    De Vos, Filip Yves Francine Leon
    Jansen, Rob L.
    van den Berkmortel, Franchette W. P. J.
    Brandsma, Dieta
    Kros, Johan M.
    Bromberg, Jacoline E.
    van Heuvel, Irene
    Smits, Marion
    van der Holt, Bronno
    Vernhout, Rene
    Van den Bent, Martin J.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2013, 31 (15)
  • [36] Predictive biomarkers for Bevacizumab activity in recurrent glioblastoma: A single institution study
    Dragan, Marcin
    Carli, Matthew
    Malkin, Mark
    Yazbeck, Victor
    CANCER RESEARCH, 2020, 80 (16)
  • [37] Third-line therapy in recurrent glioblastoma: is it another chance for bevacizumab?
    Franceschi, Enrico
    Lamberti, Giuseppe
    Paccapelo, Alexandro
    Di Battista, Monica
    Genestreti, Giovenzio
    Minichillo, Santino
    Mura, Antonella
    Bartolini, Stefania
    Agati, Raffaele
    Brandes, Alba A.
    JOURNAL OF NEURO-ONCOLOGY, 2018, 139 (02) : 383 - 388
  • [38] Third-line therapy in recurrent glioblastoma: is it another chance for bevacizumab?
    Enrico Franceschi
    Giuseppe Lamberti
    Alexandro Paccapelo
    Monica Di Battista
    Giovenzio Genestreti
    Santino Minichillo
    Antonella Mura
    Stefania Bartolini
    Raffaele Agati
    Alba A. Brandes
    Journal of Neuro-Oncology, 2018, 139 : 383 - 388
  • [39] Phase 2 study of carboplatin, irinotecan, and bevacizumab for recurrent glioblastoma after progression on bevacizumab therapy
    Reardon, David A.
    Desjardins, Annick
    Peters, Katherine B.
    Vredenburgh, James J.
    Gururangan, Sridharan
    Sampson, John H.
    McLendon, Roger E.
    Herndon, James E., II
    Coan, April
    Threatt, Stevie
    Friedman, Allan H.
    Friedman, Henry S.
    CANCER, 2011, 117 (23) : 5351 - 5358
  • [40] Tumor Treating Field Therapy in Combination with Bevacizumab for the Treatment of Recurrent Glioblastoma
    Omar, Ayman I.
    JOVE-JOURNAL OF VISUALIZED EXPERIMENTS, 2014, (92):