Measuring temporal response properties of auditory nerve fibers in cochlear implant recipients

被引:12
|
作者
Tabibi, Sonia [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Kegel, Andrea [2 ,3 ]
Lai, Wai Kong [4 ]
Bruce, Ian C. [5 ]
Dillier, Norbert [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Swiss Fed Inst Technol, Dept Informat Technol & Elect Engn, Zurich, Switzerland
[2] Univ Hosp, Lab Expt Audiol, ENT Dept, Zurich, Switzerland
[3] Univ Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
[4] RIDBC, Sydney Cochlear Implant Ctr, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[5] McMaster Univ, Dept Elect & Comp Engn, Hamilton, ON, Canada
关键词
Electrically evoked compound action potential; Neural response telemetry; Recovery; Facilitation; Cochlear implant; RECOVERY FUNCTION; TELEMETRY; STIMULATION; MODEL; REFRACTORINESS; NEUROPATHY; CHILDREN; MASKING;
D O I
10.1016/j.heares.2019.07.004
中图分类号
R36 [病理学]; R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100104 ; 100213 ;
摘要
Auditory nerve fibers' (ANFs) refractoriness and facilitation can be quantified in electrically evoked compound action potentials (ECAPs) recorded via neural response telemetry (NRT). Although facilitation has been observed in animals and human cochlear implant (CI) recipients, no study has modeled this in human CI users until now. In this study, recovery and facilitation effects at different masker and probe levels for three test electrodes (E6, E12 and E18) in 11 CI subjects were recorded. The ECAP recovery and facilitation were modeled by exponential functions and the same function used for +10 CL masker offset condition can be applied to all other masker offsets measurements. Goodness of fit was evaluated for the exponential functions. A significant effect of probe level was observed on a recovery time constant which highlights the importance of recording the recovery function at the maximum acceptable stimulus level. Facilitation time constant and amplitude showed no dependency on the probe level. However, facilitation was stronger for masker level at or around the threshold of the ECAP (T-ECAP). There was a positive correlation between facilitation magnitude and amplitude growth function (AGF) slope, which indicates that CI subjects with better peripheral neural survival have stronger facilitation. (C) 2019 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V.
引用
收藏
页码:187 / 196
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Effect of cochlear implant electrode array design on auditory nerve and behavioral response in children
    Telmesani, Laila M.
    Said, Nithreen M.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY, 2015, 79 (05) : 660 - 665
  • [22] Systematic Review of Auditory Training in Pediatric Cochlear Implant Recipients
    Rayes, Hanin
    Al-Malky, Ghada
    Vickers, Deborah
    JOURNAL OF SPEECH LANGUAGE AND HEARING RESEARCH, 2019, 62 (05): : 1574 - 1593
  • [23] Sound-Field Speech Evoked Auditory Brainstem Response in Cochlear-Implant Recipients
    Jarollahi, Farnoush
    Valadbeigi, Ayub
    Jalaei, Bahram
    Maarefvand, Mohammad
    Zarandy, Masoud Motasaddi
    Haghani, Hamid
    Shirzhiyan, Zahra
    JOURNAL OF AUDIOLOGY AND OTOLOGY, 2020, 24 (02): : 71 - 78
  • [24] Factors that influence performance in pediatric cochlear implant recipients with cochlear nerve deficiency
    Thompson, Nicholas J.
    Park, Lisa R.
    O'Connell, Brendan P.
    Zdanski, Carlton J.
    Brown, Kevin D.
    Anderson, Melissa R.
    COCHLEAR IMPLANTS INTERNATIONAL, 2024, 25 (03) : 191 - 196
  • [25] Cortical Auditory Evoked Potentials Recorded Directly Through the Cochlear Implant in Cochlear Implant Recipients: a Feasibility Study
    Attias, Joseph
    HabibAllah, Suhail
    Tarigoppula, Venkata S. Aditya
    Glick, Hannah
    Chen, Chen
    Kanthaiah, Koka
    Litvak, Leonid
    EAR AND HEARING, 2022, 43 (05): : 1426 - 1436
  • [26] Auditory Brainstem Implant in four children with cochlear nerve aplasia
    Pallares, N.
    Diamante, V
    10TH EUROPEAN SYMPOSIUM ON PAEDIATRIC COCHLEAR IMPLANTATION, 2011, : 177 - 181
  • [27] Electrically evoked compound action potential (ECAP) in cochlear implant children: Changes in auditory nerve response in first year of cochlear implant use
    Telmesani, Laila M.
    Said, Nithreen M.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY, 2016, 82 (03) : 28 - 33
  • [28] Listening Effort in Prelingual Cochlear Implant Recipients: Effects of Spectral and Temporal Auditory Processing and Contralateral Acoustic Hearing
    Yuksel, Mustafa
    Tasdemir, Ilknur
    Ciprut, Ayca
    OTOLOGY & NEUROTOLOGY, 2022, 43 (10) : E1077 - E1084
  • [29] Effects of deafness and cochlear implant use on temporal response characteristics in cat primary auditory cortex
    Fallon, James B.
    Shepherd, Robert K.
    Nayagam, David A. X.
    Wise, Andrew K.
    Heifer, Leon F.
    Landry, Thomas G.
    Irvine, Dexter R. F.
    HEARING RESEARCH, 2014, 315 : 1 - 9
  • [30] Current practices and opinions on auditory training in adult cochlear implant recipients
    Dornhoffer, James R.
    Lohse, Christine M.
    Tamati, Terrin N.
    Moberly, Aaron C.
    Carlson, Matthew L.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OTOLARYNGOLOGY, 2024, 45 (04)