Fault Isolation Based on k-Nearest Neighbor Rule for Industrial Processes

被引:104
|
作者
Zhou, Zhe [1 ]
Wen, Chenglin [2 ]
Yang, Chunjie [1 ]
机构
[1] Zhejiang Univ, Inst Ind Proc Control, State Key Lab Ind Control Technol, Hangzhou 310027, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
[2] Hangzhou Dianzi Univ, Inst Syst Sci & Control Engn, Hangzhou 310018, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Fault isolation; fault smearing; industrial alarm systems; k-nearest neighbor (kNN) rule; multiple sensor faults; RECONSTRUCTION-BASED CONTRIBUTION;
D O I
10.1109/TIE.2016.2520898
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Recently, the well-known k-nearest neighbor (kNN) rule has been successfully applied to the fault detection of industrial processes with nonlinear, multimode, and non-Gaussian distributed data. Once a fault is detected, how to investigate the root causes of the fault by isolating the true faulty variables without any historical fault information is a challenging problem. Inspired by the idea of the contribution analysis (CA) methods developed in the frame of the principal component analysis (PCA), in this paper, a novel isolation index will be provided by decomposing the kNN distance used as the detection index in kNN-based fault detection method. The commonly used CA-based isolation methods suffer from smearing effect due to the correlation among the defined isolation indices, thus prone to misdiagnosis. The proposed isolation index is defined in the original measurement space without correlation. Moreover, theoretical analysis of the isolability for the proposed fault isolation method shows that it can isolate multiple sensor faults under a less strict condition than that used in the analysis of those CA-based fault isolation methods. The numerical examples and Tennessee Eastman (TE) benchmark process are used to illustrate the effectiveness of the proposed method.
引用
收藏
页码:2578 / 2586
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Estimating the posterior probabilities using the K-nearest neighbor rule
    Atiya, AF
    NEURAL COMPUTATION, 2005, 17 (03) : 731 - 740
  • [22] Fuzzy Monotonic K-Nearest Neighbor Versus Monotonic Fuzzy K-Nearest Neighbor
    Zhu, Hong
    Wang, Xizhao
    Wang, Ran
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON FUZZY SYSTEMS, 2022, 30 (09) : 3501 - 3513
  • [23] Fault recognition based on principal component analysis and k-nearest neighbor algorithm
    Zou G.
    Ren K.
    Ji Y.
    Ding J.
    Zhang S.
    Meitiandizhi Yu Kantan/Coal Geology and Exploration, 2021, 49 (04): : 15 - 23
  • [24] Validation Based Modified K-Nearest Neighbor
    Parvin, Hamid
    Alizadeh, Hosein
    Minaei-Bidgoli, Behrouz
    IAENG TRANSACTIONS ON ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGIES, VOL II, 2009, 1127 : 153 - 161
  • [25] A memetic algorithm based on k-nearest neighbor
    Xu, Jin
    Gu, Qiong
    Gai, Zhihua
    Gong, Wenyin
    Journal of Computational Information Systems, 2014, 10 (22): : 9565 - 9574
  • [26] Real-time Monitoring of Batch Processes Using the Fast k-Nearest Neighbor Rule
    Zhou Mei
    Zhou Zhe
    Wen Chenglin
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 35TH CHINESE CONTROL CONFERENCE 2016, 2016, : 6843 - 6848
  • [27] Fault Identification Using Fast k-Nearest Neighbor Reconstruction
    Zhou, Zhe
    Li, Zuxin
    Cai, Zhiduan
    Wang, Peiliang
    PROCESSES, 2019, 7 (06)
  • [28] Fault detection strategy of standard-distance-based k nearest neighbor rule in multimode processes
    Feng L.-W.
    Zhang C.
    Li Y.
    Xie Y.-H.
    Kongzhi Lilun Yu Yingyong/Control Theory and Applications, 2019, 36 (04): : 553 - 560
  • [29] Locally determining the number of neighbors in the k-nearest neighbor rule based on statistical confidence
    Wang, JG
    Neskovic, P
    Cooper, LN
    ADVANCES IN NATURAL COMPUTATION, PT 1, PROCEEDINGS, 2005, 3610 : 71 - 80
  • [30] Comparative Analysis of K-Nearest Neighbor and Modified K-Nearest Neighbor Algorithm for Data Classification
    Okfalisa
    Mustakim
    Gazalba, Ikbal
    Reza, Nurul Gayatri Indah
    2017 2ND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCES ON INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, INFORMATION SYSTEMS AND ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING (ICITISEE): OPPORTUNITIES AND CHALLENGES ON BIG DATA FUTURE INNOVATION, 2017, : 294 - 298