Life cycle comparison of marine fuels for IMO 2020 Sulphur Cap

被引:43
|
作者
Bilgili, Levent [1 ]
机构
[1] Bandirma Onyedi Eylul Univ, Maritime Fac, Dept Naval Architecture & Marine Engn, Balikesir, Turkey
关键词
Marine fuels; IMO Sulphur Cap; Life cycle assessment; EMISSION CONTROL AREA; SHIP EMISSIONS; AIR-POLLUTION; SEA; REGULATIONS; SECA; TRANSPORTATION; REDUCTION; BENEFITS; PARTICLE;
D O I
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.145719
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Ships, which are the backbone of world trade, are also major emission generators. IMO has prepared a regulation that came into force on January 1, 2020, in particular to reduce ship-related sulphur oxides. Accordingly, the sulphur content of the marine fuels cannot exceed 0.5% by mass. Although these fuels have a significant effect in reducing the sulphur oxides, the holistic environmental effects of the fuels must be examined within a life cycle perspective. In this study, LCA of four different marine fuels were realized and the environmental impacts of the fuels in production, distribution, and operation processes were investigated. The main purpose of this study is to increase precision by focusing on a small number of fuels, while increasing accuracy by obtaining a large number of LCA results. It is concluded that despite the success of low sulphur fuels during operation, the overall environmental effects are higher than other fuels. According to the LCA results, there are no significant differences between the fuels and HFO still remains an important and preferable fuel for the environment. Consequently, in life cycle perspective, it was concluded that the expected results of IMO 2020 Sulphur Cap are not at a desirable level. Thus, alternative fuels would be more beneficial in terms of total environmental issues and IMO should focus more on developing new regulations and policies on alternative fuels. (c) 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The IMO 2020 sulphur cap: a step forward for planetary health?
    Ji, John S.
    [J]. LANCET PLANETARY HEALTH, 2020, 4 (02): : E46 - E47
  • [2] Can non-compliance with the IMO 2020 Sulphur Cap impact vessel seaworthiness, legality and marine insurance coverage?
    Andrew Mackenzie
    [J]. SN Business & Economics, 2 (10):
  • [3] Comparative Life Cycle Assessment of Alternative Marine Fuels
    Zincir, Bugra Arda
    Arslanoglu, Yasin
    [J]. FUEL, 2024, 358
  • [4] Life cycle assessment of alternative marine fuels for super yacht
    Wang, Yifan
    Maidment, Harris
    Boccolini, Vittorio
    Wright, Laurie
    [J]. REGIONAL STUDIES IN MARINE SCIENCE, 2022, 55
  • [5] Comparative assessment of alternative marine fuels in life cycle perspective
    Bilgili, Levent
    [J]. RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2021, 144
  • [6] A life-cycle comparison of alternative automobile fuels
    MacLean, HL
    Lave, LB
    Lankey, R
    Joshi, S
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AIR & WASTE MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION, 2000, 50 (10): : 1769 - 1779
  • [7] Life-cycle comparison of alternative automobile fuels
    [J]. MacLean, Heather L., 1600, (Air & Waste Management Assoc, Pittsburgh, PA, United States):
  • [8] Compliance to IMO Sulphur Cap Regulations for Vessels of 10 Years of Age and Below
    Murugan, Kogulan
    Md Arof, Aminuddin
    [J]. Advanced Structured Materials, 2023, 193 : 147 - 153
  • [9] Green Shipping and Trade: Allocating Costs of the IMO Sulphur Regulation 2020
    Singh, Abhay
    Shanthakumar, Sanjeevi
    [J]. GLOBAL TRADE AND CUSTOMS JOURNAL, 2023, 18 (03): : 110 - 119
  • [10] Unravelling the sulphur cycle of marine sediments
    Jorgensen, Bo Barker
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2019, 21 (10) : 3533 - 3538