Green Shipping and Trade: Allocating Costs of the IMO Sulphur Regulation 2020

被引:0
|
作者
Singh, Abhay [1 ]
Shanthakumar, Sanjeevi [1 ]
机构
[1] Gujarat Natl Law Univ, Koba, India
来源
GLOBAL TRADE AND CUSTOMS JOURNAL | 2023年 / 18卷 / 03期
关键词
Charterparty; VLSFO; EGCS; contract; obligation; fixtures; Sulphur;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
D81 [国际关系];
学科分类号
030207 ;
摘要
In January 2020 the International Maritime Organisation (IMO) imposed, down from 3.5% m/m, a new limit of 0.50% m/m Sulphur limit from exhaust gases originating from commercial vessels. This new standard forced the maritime industry to switch to compliant fuels (such as Very Low Sulphur Fuel Oil (VLSFO) and ultra-low sulphur fuel oil (ULSFO) blends) or use an exhaust gas cleaning system (EGCS). Although there may be a consensus that this is a good thing, achievement of benefits has created contractual challenges for the industry. Responsibilities are divided between shipowner and charterer through forming a voyage charter, a time charter, or a bareboat charter (BBC). Baltic and International Maritime Council (BIMCO) and Intertanko provide standard contracts allocating the responsibilities of compliance with IMO Sulphur regulations between shipowner and charterer under the time charter. The compliance obligations under the voyage charterparty and BBC are still unaddressed. Here, we address them and offer an allocation of the responsibility.
引用
收藏
页码:110 / 119
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Financial impact of the IMO 2020 regulation on dry bulk shipping
    Sigalas, Christos
    [J]. MARITIME TRANSPORT RESEARCH, 2022, 3
  • [2] Six months on: Has shipping met the mark with the IMO 2020 0.50% sulphur fuel switchover?
    Wilson, Tim
    [J]. Naval Architect, 2020, 2020-August (August): : 32 - 33
  • [3] The IMO 2020 sulphur cap: a step forward for planetary health?
    Ji, John S.
    [J]. LANCET PLANETARY HEALTH, 2020, 4 (02): : E46 - E47
  • [4] Life cycle comparison of marine fuels for IMO 2020 Sulphur Cap
    Bilgili, Levent
    [J]. SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2021, 774
  • [5] Crude oil trade and green shipping choices
    Jia, Haiying
    [J]. TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART D-TRANSPORT AND ENVIRONMENT, 2018, 65 : 618 - 634
  • [6] Cost Analysis of Pathways for the US Shipping Fleet to Comply with the IMO 2020 Rule
    Uria-Martinez, Rocio
    Wang, Zhaojun
    Leiby, Paul N.
    Corbett, James J.
    [J]. TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH RECORD, 2024, 2678 (04) : 674 - 689
  • [7] Effects of IMO sulphur limits on the international shipping company?s operations: From a game theory perspective
    Jiang, Ran
    Zhao, Laijun
    [J]. COMPUTERS & INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING, 2022, 173
  • [8] Costs and benefits of low-sulphur fuel standard for Baltic Sea shipping
    Antturi, Jim
    Hanninen, Otto
    Jalkanen, Jukka-Pekka
    Johansson, Lasse
    Prank, Marje
    Sofiev, Mikhail
    Ollikainen, Markku
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2016, 184 : 431 - 440
  • [9] SHIPPING COSTS AND THE TERMS OF TRADE - AUSTRALIA AND NEW-ZEALAND
    CHISHOLM, M
    [J]. THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES C-APPLIED STATISTICS, 1959, 8 (03): : 196 - 201
  • [10] Options for Regional Regulation of Merchant Shipping Outside IMO, with Particular Reference to the Arctic Region
    Molenaar, Erik J.
    [J]. OCEAN DEVELOPMENT AND INTERNATIONAL LAW, 2014, 45 (03): : 272 - 298