Evaluating Domain Ontologies: Clarification, Classification, and Challenges

被引:66
|
作者
Mcdaniel, Melinda [1 ]
Storey, Veda C. [2 ]
机构
[1] Georgia Inst Technol, Coll Comp, 801 Atlantic Dr,Room 135, Atlanta, GA 30332 USA
[2] Georgia State Univ, Comp Informat Syst, J Mack Robinson Coll Business, Atlanta, GA 30302 USA
关键词
Ontology; evaluation; metrics; domain ontology; applied ontology; ontology development; ontology application; task-ontology fit; assessment; SEMANTIC WEB; KNOWLEDGE; FRAMEWORK; SYSTEMS; QUALITY; METRICS; EVOLUTION; DESIGN; FOUNDATIONS; COMPLEXITY;
D O I
10.1145/3329124
中图分类号
TP301 [理论、方法];
学科分类号
081202 ;
摘要
The number of applications being developed that require access to knowledge about the real world has increased rapidly over the past two decades. Domain ontologies, which formalize the terms being used in a discipline, have become essential for research in areas such as Machine Learning, the Internet of Things, Robotics, and Natural Language Processing, because they enable separate systems to exchange information. The quality of these domain ontologies, however, must be ensured for meaningful communication. Assessing the quality of domain ontologies for their suitability to potential applications remains difficult, even though a variety of frameworks and metrics have been developed for doing so. This article reviews domain ontology assessment efforts to highlight the work that has been carried out and to clarify the important issues that remain. These assessment efforts are classified into five distinct evaluation approaches and the state of the art of each described. Challenges associated with domain ontology assessment are outlined and recommendations are made for future research and applications.
引用
收藏
页数:44
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Clarification for Carnegie Classification story
    McCormick, AC
    ACADEME-BULLETIN OF THE AAUP, 2000, 86 (02): : 2 - 2
  • [32] Complication begets clarification in classification
    Barkovich, James
    BRAIN, 2013, 136 : 368 - 370
  • [33] Martial Categories: Clarification and Classification
    Martinkova, Irena
    Parry, Jim
    JOURNAL OF THE PHILOSOPHY OF SPORT, 2016, 43 (01) : 143 - 162
  • [34] Completing and Debugging Ontologies: State-of-the-art and Challenges in Repairing Ontologies
    Lambrix, Patrick
    ACM JOURNAL OF DATA AND INFORMATION QUALITY, 2023, 15 (04):
  • [35] LYMPHOMA CLASSIFICATION PROPOSAL - CLARIFICATION
    HARRIS, NL
    JAFFE, ES
    STEIN, H
    BANKS, PM
    CHAN, JKC
    CLEARY, ML
    DELSOL, G
    DEWOLFPEETERS, C
    FALINI, B
    GATTER, KC
    GROGAN, TM
    ISAACSON, PG
    KNOWLES, DM
    MASON, DY
    MULLERHERMELINK, HK
    PILERI, SA
    PIRIS, MA
    RALFKIAER, E
    WARNKE, RA
    BLOOD, 1995, 85 (03) : 857 - 860
  • [36] Tackling the challenges of matching biomedical ontologies
    Daniel Faria
    Catia Pesquita
    Isabela Mott
    Catarina Martins
    Francisco M. Couto
    Isabel F. Cruz
    Journal of Biomedical Semantics, 9
  • [37] Tackling the challenges of matching biomedical ontologies
    Faria, Daniel
    Pesquita, Catia
    Mott, Isabela
    Martins, Catarina
    Couto, Francisco M.
    Cruz, Isabel F.
    JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL SEMANTICS, 2018, 9
  • [38] Contextual ontologies - Motivations, challenges, and solutions
    Benslimane, Djamal
    Arara, Ahmed
    Falquet, Gilles
    Maamar, Zakaria
    Thiran, Philippe
    Gargouri, Faiez
    ADVANCES IN INFORMATION SYSTEMS, PROCEEDINGS, 2006, 4243 : 168 - 176
  • [39] Ontologies for Network Security and Future Challenges
    Velasco Silva, Danny
    Rodriguez Rafael, Glen
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 12TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON CYBER WARFARE AND SECURITY (ICCWS 2017), 2017, : 541 - 547
  • [40] Towards Pragmatic Explanations for Domain Ontologies
    Romanenko, Elena
    Calvanese, Diego
    Guizzardi, Giancarlo
    KNOWLEDGE ENGINEERING AND KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT, EKAW 2022, 2022, 13514 : 201 - 208