Impact and Feasibility of Personalized Decision Support for Older Patients with Diabetes: A Pilot Randomized Trial

被引:18
|
作者
Huang, Elbert S. [1 ]
Nathan, Aviva G. [1 ]
Cooper, Jennifer M. [1 ]
Lee, Sang Mee [2 ]
Shin, Na [1 ]
John, Priya M. [1 ]
Dale, William [3 ]
Col, Nananda F. [4 ]
Meltzer, David O. [5 ]
Chin, Marshall H. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Chicago, Gen Internal Med Sect, 5841 South Maryland Ave,MC 2007, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
[2] Univ Chicago, Dept Publ Hlth Sci, 5841 South Maryland Ave,MC 2007, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
[3] Univ Chicago, Sect Geriatr & Palliat Med, 5841 South Maryland Ave,MC 2007, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
[4] Shared Decis Making Resources, Georgetown, ME USA
[5] Univ Chicago, Sect Hosp Med, 5841 South Maryland Ave,MC 2007, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
关键词
type; 2; diabetes; aging; personalized medicine; decision aids; decision support; chronic disease modeling; randomized trial; LIFETIME HEALTH OUTCOMES; GUIDELINE ADHERENCE; GLYCEMIC CONTROL; TYPE-2; MELLITUS; CARE; AID; OVERTREATMENT; ASSOCIATION; VALIDATION;
D O I
10.1177/0272989X16654142
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background. Diabetes guidelines recommend individualizing glycemic goals (A1C) for older patients. The aim of this study was to assess a personalized Web-based decision support tool. Methods. We randomized physicians and their patients with type 2 diabetes (65 years of age) to a support tool or educational pamphlet (75:25 patients). Prior to a visit, intervention patients interacted with the tool, which provided personalized risk predictions and elicited treatment preferences. Main outcomes included 1) patient-doctor communication, 2) decisional conflict, 3) changes in goals, and 4) intervention acceptability. Results. We did not find significant differences in proportions of patients who had an A1C discussion (91% intervention v. 76% control; P = 0.19). Intervention patients had larger declines in the informed subscale of decisional conflict (-20 v. 0, respectively; P = 0.04). There were no significant differences in proportions of patients with changes in goals (49% v. 28%, respectively; P = 0.08). Most intervention patients reported that the tool was easy to use (91%) and helped them to communicate (84%). A limitation was that this was a pilot trial at one academic institution. Conclusions. Web-based decision support tools may be a practical approach to facilitating the personalization of goals for chronic conditions. Trial registration: NCT02169999 (https://clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT02169999).
引用
收藏
页码:611 / 617
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Amnioinfusion for intrauterine neuroprotection: A pilot randomized feasibility trial
    Polnaszek, Brock
    Rossen, Julia
    Murphy, Lauren M.
    Whelan, Anna
    Hamel, Maureen
    Rouse, Dwight J.
    Tuuli, Methodius G.
    Lewkowitz, Adam K.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2024, 230 (01) : S165 - S165
  • [42] The Impact of CPAP on Cardiovascular Biomarkers in Minimally Symptomatic Patients with Obstructive Sleep Apnea: A Pilot Feasibility Randomized Crossover Trial
    Vikram R. Comondore
    Rupi Cheema
    Joel Fox
    Arsalan Butt
    G. B. John Mancini
    John A. Fleetham
    C. Frank Ryan
    Sammy Chan
    Najib T. Ayas
    Lung, 2009, 187 : 17 - 22
  • [43] The Impact of CPAP on Cardiovascular Biomarkers in Minimally Symptomatic Patients with Obstructive Sleep Apnea: A Pilot Feasibility Randomized Crossover Trial
    Comondore, Vikram R.
    Cheema, Rupi
    Fox, Joel
    Butt, Arsalan
    Mancini, G. B. John
    Fleetham, John A.
    Ryan, C. Frank
    Chan, Sammy
    Ayas, Najib T.
    LUNG, 2009, 187 (01) : 17 - 22
  • [44] The intelligent diabetes telemonitoring using decision support to treat patients on insulin therapy (DiaTRUST) trial: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
    Thomsen, Camilla H. N.
    Norlev, Jannie T. D.
    Hangaard, Stine
    Jensen, Morten H.
    Hejlesen, Ole
    Cohen, Sarah R.
    Kofoed-Enevoldsen, Allan
    Kristensen, Sika N. S.
    Aradottir, Tinna B.
    Kaas, Anne
    Vestergaard, Peter
    Kronborg, Thomas
    TRIALS, 2024, 25 (01)
  • [45] Impact of EHR-Based Clinical Decision Support on Adherence to Guidelines for Patients on NSAIDs: A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Gill, James M.
    Mainous, Arch G., III
    Koopman, Richelle J.
    Player, Marty S.
    Everett, Charles J.
    Chen, Ying Xia
    Diamond, James J.
    Lieberman, Michael I.
    ANNALS OF FAMILY MEDICINE, 2011, 9 (01) : 22 - 30
  • [46] Data-Driven Personalized Feedback to Patients with Type 1 Diabetes: A Randomized Trial
    Skrovseth, Stein Olav
    Arsand, Eirik
    Godtliebsen, Fred
    Joakimsen, Ragnar M.
    DIABETES TECHNOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 2015, 17 (07) : 482 - 489
  • [47] A pilot study testing the feasibility of skin temperature monitoring to reduce recurrent foot ulcers in patients with diabetes - a randomized controlled trial
    Skafjeld, Anita
    Iversen, Marjolein. M.
    Holme, Ingar
    Ribu, Lis
    Hvaal, Kjetil
    Kilhovd, Bente. K.
    BMC ENDOCRINE DISORDERS, 2015, 15
  • [48] A pilot study testing the feasibility of skin temperature monitoring to reduce recurrent foot ulcers in patients with diabetes – a randomized controlled trial
    Anita Skafjeld
    Marjolein. M. Iversen
    Ingar Holme
    Lis Ribu
    Kjetil Hvaal
    Bente. K. Kilhovd
    BMC Endocrine Disorders, 15
  • [49] Feasibility and effectiveness of cardiac telerehabilitation for older adults with coronary heart disease: A pilot randomized controlled trial
    Su, Jing Jing
    Wong, Arkers Kwan Ching
    He, Xi-Fei
    Zhang, Li-ping
    Cheng, Jie
    Lu, Li-Juan
    Lan, Lan
    Wang, Zhaozhao
    Lin, Rose S. Y.
    Batalik, Ladislav
    CONTEMPORARY CLINICAL TRIALS COMMUNICATIONS, 2024, 42
  • [50] Feasibility and acceptability of a decision aid designed for people facing advanced or terminal illness: a pilot randomized trial
    Matlock, Dan D.
    Keech, Tarah A. E.
    McKenzie, Marlene B.
    Bronsert, Michael R.
    Nowels, Carolyn T.
    Kutner, Jean S.
    HEALTH EXPECTATIONS, 2014, 17 (01) : 49 - 59