Impact and Feasibility of Personalized Decision Support for Older Patients with Diabetes: A Pilot Randomized Trial

被引:18
|
作者
Huang, Elbert S. [1 ]
Nathan, Aviva G. [1 ]
Cooper, Jennifer M. [1 ]
Lee, Sang Mee [2 ]
Shin, Na [1 ]
John, Priya M. [1 ]
Dale, William [3 ]
Col, Nananda F. [4 ]
Meltzer, David O. [5 ]
Chin, Marshall H. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Chicago, Gen Internal Med Sect, 5841 South Maryland Ave,MC 2007, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
[2] Univ Chicago, Dept Publ Hlth Sci, 5841 South Maryland Ave,MC 2007, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
[3] Univ Chicago, Sect Geriatr & Palliat Med, 5841 South Maryland Ave,MC 2007, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
[4] Shared Decis Making Resources, Georgetown, ME USA
[5] Univ Chicago, Sect Hosp Med, 5841 South Maryland Ave,MC 2007, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
关键词
type; 2; diabetes; aging; personalized medicine; decision aids; decision support; chronic disease modeling; randomized trial; LIFETIME HEALTH OUTCOMES; GUIDELINE ADHERENCE; GLYCEMIC CONTROL; TYPE-2; MELLITUS; CARE; AID; OVERTREATMENT; ASSOCIATION; VALIDATION;
D O I
10.1177/0272989X16654142
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background. Diabetes guidelines recommend individualizing glycemic goals (A1C) for older patients. The aim of this study was to assess a personalized Web-based decision support tool. Methods. We randomized physicians and their patients with type 2 diabetes (65 years of age) to a support tool or educational pamphlet (75:25 patients). Prior to a visit, intervention patients interacted with the tool, which provided personalized risk predictions and elicited treatment preferences. Main outcomes included 1) patient-doctor communication, 2) decisional conflict, 3) changes in goals, and 4) intervention acceptability. Results. We did not find significant differences in proportions of patients who had an A1C discussion (91% intervention v. 76% control; P = 0.19). Intervention patients had larger declines in the informed subscale of decisional conflict (-20 v. 0, respectively; P = 0.04). There were no significant differences in proportions of patients with changes in goals (49% v. 28%, respectively; P = 0.08). Most intervention patients reported that the tool was easy to use (91%) and helped them to communicate (84%). A limitation was that this was a pilot trial at one academic institution. Conclusions. Web-based decision support tools may be a practical approach to facilitating the personalization of goals for chronic conditions. Trial registration: NCT02169999 (https://clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT02169999).
引用
收藏
页码:611 / 617
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A Pilot RCT of Personalized Decision Support for Older Patients With Diabetes
    Huang, Elbert S.
    Nathan, Aviva G.
    Cooper, Jennifer
    John, Priya M.
    Dale, William
    Col, Nananda
    Meltzer, David O.
    Chin, Marshall H.
    DIABETES, 2013, 62 : A336 - A336
  • [2] Decision Support for Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Replacement A Pilot Feasibility Randomized Controlled Trial
    Lewis, Krystina B.
    Birnie, David
    Carroll, Sandra L.
    Brousseau-Whaley, Carolynne
    Clark, Lorraine
    Green, Martin
    Nair, Girish M.
    Nery, Pablo B.
    Redpath, Calum
    Stacey, Dawn
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR NURSING, 2021, 36 (02) : 143 - 150
  • [3] Impact of Electronic Health Record Clinical Decision Support on Diabetes Care: A Randomized Trial
    O'Connor, Patrick J.
    Sperl-Hillen, JoAnn M.
    Rush, William A.
    Johnson, Paul E.
    Amundson, Gerald H.
    Asche, Stephen E.
    Ekstrom, Heidi L.
    Gilmer, Todd P.
    ANNALS OF FAMILY MEDICINE, 2011, 9 (01) : 12 - 21
  • [4] A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial of the Feasibility, Acceptability, and Impact of Giving Information on Personalized Genomic Risk of Melanoma to the Public
    Smit, Amelia K.
    Espinoza, David
    Newson, Ainsley J.
    Morton, Rachael L.
    Fenton, Georgina
    Freeman, Lucinda
    Dunlop, Kate
    Butow, Phyllis N.
    Law, Matthew H.
    Kimlin, Michael G.
    Keogh, Louise A.
    Dobbinson, Suzanne J.
    Kirk, Judy
    Kanetsky, Peter A.
    Mann, Graham J.
    Cust, Anne E.
    CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY BIOMARKERS & PREVENTION, 2017, 26 (02) : 212 - 221
  • [5] Feasibility and impact of Fit & Strong! Program in Portuguese older adults with osteoarthritis: A pilot randomized controlled trial
    Duarte, Natalia
    Santos, Catarina
    Hughes, Susan L.
    Paul, Constanca
    GERIATRIC NURSING, 2020, 41 (06) : 804 - 811
  • [6] Development and feasibility testing of decision support for patients who are candidates for a prophylactic implantable defibrillator: a study protocol for a pilot randomized controlled trial
    Sandra L Carroll
    Michael McGillion
    Dawn Stacey
    Jeff S Healey
    Gina Browne
    Heather M Arthur
    Lehana Thabane
    Trials, 14
  • [7] Development and feasibility testing of decision support for patients who are candidates for a prophylactic implantable defibrillator: a study protocol for a pilot randomized controlled trial
    Carroll, Sandra L.
    McGillion, Michael
    Stacey, Dawn
    Healey, Jeff S.
    Browne, Gina
    Arthur, Heather M.
    Thabane, Lehana
    TRIALS, 2013, 14
  • [8] Feasibility and impact of an evidence-based electronic decision support system for diabetes care in family medicine: protocol for a cluster randomized controlled trial
    Heselmans, Annemie
    Van de Velde, Stijn
    Ramaekers, Dirk
    Vander Stichele, Robert
    Aertgeerts, Bert
    IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE, 2013, 8 : 1 - 7
  • [9] Feasibility and impact of an evidence-based electronic decision support system for diabetes care in family medicine: protocol for a cluster randomized controlled trial
    Annemie Heselmans
    Stijn Van de Velde
    Dirk Ramaekers
    Robert Vander Stichele
    Bert Aertgeerts
    Implementation Science, 8
  • [10] A randomized controlled trial testing a decision support intervention for older patients with advanced kidney disease
    Brown, Leanne
    Gardner, Glenn
    Bonner, Ann
    JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING, 2019, 75 (11) : 3032 - 3044