Reassessment and Follow-Up Results of BI-RADS Category 3 Lesions Detected on Screening Breast Ultrasound

被引:33
|
作者
Chae, Eun Young [1 ]
Cha, Joo Hee [1 ]
Shin, Hee Jung [1 ]
Choi, Woo Jung [1 ]
Kim, Hak Hee [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ulsan, Coll Med, Asan Med Ctr, Dept Radiol,Res Inst Radiol, 388-1 Pungnap 2 Dong, Seoul 138736, South Korea
关键词
BI-RADS; breast neoplasm; probably benign lesion; ultrasound; DENSE BREASTS; ELEVATED RISK; US; MAMMOGRAPHY; SONOGRAPHY; INTERVAL; CANCERS; TRIAL; WOMEN;
D O I
10.2214/AJR.15.14785
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study is to determine the frequency and the malignancy rate of BI-RADS category 3 lesions detected on screening breast ultrasound and to reassess whether they satisfied the requirements of the American College of Radiology Imaging Network (ACRIN) 6666 protocol. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Of 28,796 asymptomatic women who underwent screening mammography during 2 years, 12,187 underwent additional ultrasound as part of the screening. Patients for whom BI-RADS category 3 lesions were seen on the ultrasound were selected. We reviewed the initial ultrasound showing BI-RADS category 3 lesions and mammograms. We also investigated the clinical outcome of these lesions using the reference standard of a combination of pathologic analysis and follow-up for at least 24 months. RESULTS. The frequency of BI-RADS category 3 lesions detected on screening ultrasound was 14.6% (1783/12,187). Of the 1164 patients with a follow-up duration of at least 24 months or whose lesions were biopsied, eight were eventually proven to have malignancy (0.7%). The malignancy rate was 2.2% (4/184) for patients with abnormal mammograms and 0.4% (4/980) for those with normal mammograms. When the ACRIN 6666 protocols were strictly applied, 225 (19.3%) lesions were retrospectively recategorized as BI-RADS category 4 (n = 12) or category 2 (n = 213). All detected malignancies were early breast cancers with no lymph node metastasis. CONCLUSION. Although the frequency of ultrasound BI-RADS category 3 lesions is considerably high (14.6%), the malignancy rate is very low (0.7%), especially in patients with a normal mammogram. Therefore, with BI-RADS category 3 assessment, careful evaluation is required to avoid unnecessary short-interval follow-up or biopsy.
引用
收藏
页码:666 / 672
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] MR imaging in probably benign lesions (BI-RADS category 3) of the breast
    Gökalp, G
    Topal, U
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2006, 57 (03) : 436 - 444
  • [22] Computer-aided classification of BI-RADS category 3 breast lesions
    Buchbinder, SS
    Leichter, IS
    Lederman, RB
    Novak, B
    Bamberger, PN
    Sklair-Levy, M
    Yarmish, G
    Fields, SI
    RADIOLOGY, 2004, 230 (03) : 820 - 823
  • [23] Quantitative Ultrasound Analysis for Classification of BI-RADS Category 3 Breast Masses
    Woo Kyung Moon
    Chung-Ming Lo
    Jung Min Chang
    Chiun-Sheng Huang
    Jeon-Hor Chen
    Ruey-Feng Chang
    Journal of Digital Imaging, 2013, 26 : 1091 - 1098
  • [24] ACR BI-RADS Category 3 Lesions in Women Younger Than 30 Follow-up Outcomes and Factors Associated With Biopsy
    Merchant, Kanwal
    Omar, Lena
    Hayes, Jody
    Compton, Lindsay
    Polat, Dogan
    Xi, Yin
    Dogan, Basak
    JOURNAL OF ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE, 2021, 40 (12) : 2699 - 2707
  • [25] Factors Associated With Optimal Follow-up in Women With BI-RADS 3 Breast Findings
    Lacson, Ronilda
    Wang, Aijia
    Cochon, Laila
    Giess, Catherine
    Desai, Sonali
    Eappen, Sunil
    Khorasani, Ramin
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF RADIOLOGY, 2020, 17 (04) : 469 - 474
  • [26] Quantitative Ultrasound Analysis for Classification of BI-RADS Category 3 Breast Masses
    Moon, Woo Kyung
    Lo, Chung-Ming
    Chang, Jung Min
    Huang, Chiun-Sheng
    Chen, Jeon-Hor
    Chang, Ruey-Feng
    JOURNAL OF DIGITAL IMAGING, 2013, 26 (06) : 1091 - 1098
  • [27] Characteristics, Malignancy Rate, and Follow-up of BI-RADS Category 3 Lesions Identified at Breast MR Imaging: Implications for MR Image Interpretation and Management
    Chikarmane, Sona A.
    Birdwell, Robyn L.
    Poole, Patricia S.
    Sippo, Dorothy A.
    Giess, Catherine S.
    RADIOLOGY, 2016, 280 (03) : 707 - 715
  • [28] Assessment of BI-RADS Category 4 Lesions Detected with Screening Mammography and Screening US: Utility of MR Imaging
    Strobel, Kevin
    Schrading, Simone
    Hansen, Nienke L.
    Barabasch, Alexandra
    Kuhl, Christiane K.
    RADIOLOGY, 2015, 274 (02) : 343 - 351
  • [29] Cancer Yield and Patterns of Follow-up for BI-RADS Category 3 after Screening Mammography Recall in the National Mammography Database
    Berg, Wendie A.
    Berg, Jeremy M.
    Sickles, Edward A.
    Burnside, Elizabeth S.
    Zuley, Margarita L.
    Rosenberg, Robert D.
    Lee, Cindy S.
    RADIOLOGY, 2020, 296 (01) : 32 - 41
  • [30] Breast MRI and BI-RADS category 3: Is it appropriate?
    Borders, Marisa H.
    BREAST JOURNAL, 2018, 24 (02): : 107 - 108