Temporary Health Impact of Prostate MRI and Transrectal Prostate Biopsy in Active Surveillance Prostate Cancer Patients

被引:6
|
作者
Shankar, Prasad R. [1 ,2 ]
Maturen, Katherine E. [1 ]
George, Arvin K. [3 ]
Borza, Tudor [4 ]
Ellimoottil, Chandy [3 ]
Montgomery, Jeffrey S. [3 ]
Wei, John T. [3 ]
Denton, Brian T. [5 ]
Davenport, Matthew S. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Michigan Med, Dept Radiol, Ann Arbor, MI USA
[2] Michigan Med, Michigan Radiol Qual Collaborat, Ann Arbor, MI USA
[3] Michigan Med, Dept Urol, Ann Arbor, MI USA
[4] Univ Wisconsin, Dept Urol, Madison, WI USA
[5] Univ Michigan, Dept Ind & Operat Engn, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
关键词
Quality of life; patient-reported outcomes; prostate cancer; testing-related utilities; active surveillance; MEN; MORBIDITIES; STATES; INDEX;
D O I
10.1016/j.jacr.2018.11.031
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: To assess the temporary health impact of prostate multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) and transrectal prostate biopsy in an active surveillance prostate cancer population. Methods: A two-arm institutional review board-approved HIPAA-compliant prospective observational patient-reported outcomes study was performed from November 2017 to July 2018. Inclusion criteria were men with Gleason 6 prostate cancer in active surveillance undergoing either prostate mpMRI or transrectal prostate biopsy. A survey instrument was constructed using validated metrics in consultation with the local patient- and family-centered care organization. Study subjects were recruited at the time of diagnostic testing and completed the instrument by phone 24 to 72 hours after testing. The primary outcome measure was summary-testing-related quality of life (summary utility score), derived from the testing morbidities index (TMI) (scale: 0 = death and 1 = perfect health). TMI is stratified into seven domains, with each domain scored from 1 (no health impact) to 5 (extreme health impact). Testing-related quality-of-life measures in the two cohorts were compared with Mann-Whitney U test. Results: In all, 122 subjects were recruited, and 90% (110 of 122 [MRI 55 of 60, biopsy 55 of 62]) successfully completed the survey instrument. The temporary quality-of-life impact of transrectal biopsy was significantly greater than that of prostate mpMRI (0.82, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.79-0.85, versus 0.95, 95% CI 0.94-0.97; P <.001). The largest mean, domain-level difference was for intraprocedural pain (transrectal biopsy 2.6, 95% CI 2.4-2.8, versus mpMRI 1.3, 95% CI 1.14.5; P <.001). Conclusion: Transrectal prostate biopsy has greater temporary health impact (lower testing-related quality-of-life measure) than prostate mpMRI.
引用
收藏
页码:1385 / 1392
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Detecting Prostate Cancer A Prospective Comparison of Systematic Prostate Biopsy With Targeted Biopsy Guided by Fused MRI and Transrectal Ultrasound
    Brock, Marko
    von Bodman, Christian
    Palisaar, Jueri
    Becker, Wolfgang
    Martin-Seidel, Philipp
    Noldus, Joachim
    DEUTSCHES ARZTEBLATT INTERNATIONAL, 2015, 112 (37): : 605 - U13
  • [42] IMPACT OF COMPLIANCE ON OUTCOMES FOR PATIENTS ON ACTIVE SURVEILLANCE FOR PROSTATE CANCER
    Detsky, Jay
    Ghiam, Alireza Fotouhi
    Klotz, Laurence
    Liu, Stanley
    Loblaw, Andrew
    Vesprini, Danny
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2019, 139 : S8 - S9
  • [43] The impact of transrectal prostate biopsy on erectile function
    Linden-Castro, E.
    Pelayo-Nieto, M.
    Espinosa-Perezgrovas, D.
    Rubio-Arellano, E. D.
    Catalan-Quinto, G.
    Guzman-Hernandez, F.
    Morales-Covarrubias, J. A.
    Cortez-Betancourt, R.
    ACTAS UROLOGICAS ESPANOLAS, 2016, 40 (07): : 453 - 456
  • [44] Diagnostic capability of multiparametric MRI in patients with transrectal prostate biopsy.
    Antonio Altamirano, Jaime
    Federico Pinto, Ivan
    Mauricio Vilches, Roberto
    Gonzalo Diaz, Jorge
    Sandoval, Camilo
    Daniel Vidal, Alvaro
    Canals, Mauricio
    Roman, Cristobal
    Rojas, Alejandro
    Jesus Quiroz, Maria
    Vega, Andres
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2016, 34 (02)
  • [45] IS MULTIPARAMETRIC MRI RELIABLE IN SELECTING PATIENTS WITH PROSTATE CANCER FOR ACTIVE SURVEILLANCE?
    Porpiglia, Francesco
    Fiori, Cristian
    Mele, Fabrizio
    Manfredi, Matteo
    Grande, Susanna
    Poggio, Massimiliano
    Garrou, Diletta
    Bollito, Enrico
    Papotti, Mauro
    Russo, Filippo
    Regge, Daniele
    ANTICANCER RESEARCH, 2013, 33 (05) : 2323 - 2324
  • [46] Biological MRI-guided transrectal prostate biopsy
    Grubb, RL
    Susil, R
    Krieger, A
    Guion, P
    Ullman, KL
    Metzger, G
    Smith, SL
    Singh, AK
    Linehan, WM
    Camphausen, K
    Coleman, CN
    Atalar, E
    Choyke, P
    Ménard, C
    Coleman, J
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2005, 173 (04): : 364 - 364
  • [47] MRI vs Transrectal Ultrasound to Estimate Prostate Volume and PSAD : Impact on Prostate Cancer Detection
    Choe, Shawn
    Patel, Hiten D.
    Lanzotti, Nicholas
    Okabe, Yudai
    Rac, Goran
    Shea, Steven M.
    Gorbonos, Alex
    Quek, Marcus L.
    Flanigan, Robert C.
    Goldberg, Ari
    Gupta, Gopal N.
    UROLOGY, 2023, 171 : 172 - 178
  • [48] Impact of bilateral biopsy-detected prostate cancer on an active surveillance population
    Jonathan H. Wang
    Pablo Sierra
    Kyle A. Richards
    E. Jason Abel
    Glen O. Allen
    Tracy M. Downs
    David F. Jarrard
    BMC Urology, 19
  • [49] THE PROGNOSTIC IMPACT OF A NEGATIVE CONFIRMATORY BIOPSY IN MEN ON ACTIVE SURVEILLANCE FOR PROSTATE CANCER
    Salari, Keyan
    Zlatev, Dimitar
    Kuppermann, David
    Preston, Mark
    Dahl, Douglas
    Efstathiou, Jason
    Blute, Michael
    Zietman, Anthony
    Feldman, Adam
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2018, 199 (04): : E210 - E210
  • [50] Impact of bilateral biopsy-detected prostate cancer on an active surveillance population
    Wang, Jonathan H.
    Sierra, Pablo
    Richards, Kyle A.
    Abel, E. Jason
    Allen, Glen O.
    Downs, Tracy M.
    Jarrard, David F.
    BMC UROLOGY, 2019, 19 (1)