Temporary Health Impact of Prostate MRI and Transrectal Prostate Biopsy in Active Surveillance Prostate Cancer Patients

被引:6
|
作者
Shankar, Prasad R. [1 ,2 ]
Maturen, Katherine E. [1 ]
George, Arvin K. [3 ]
Borza, Tudor [4 ]
Ellimoottil, Chandy [3 ]
Montgomery, Jeffrey S. [3 ]
Wei, John T. [3 ]
Denton, Brian T. [5 ]
Davenport, Matthew S. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Michigan Med, Dept Radiol, Ann Arbor, MI USA
[2] Michigan Med, Michigan Radiol Qual Collaborat, Ann Arbor, MI USA
[3] Michigan Med, Dept Urol, Ann Arbor, MI USA
[4] Univ Wisconsin, Dept Urol, Madison, WI USA
[5] Univ Michigan, Dept Ind & Operat Engn, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
关键词
Quality of life; patient-reported outcomes; prostate cancer; testing-related utilities; active surveillance; MEN; MORBIDITIES; STATES; INDEX;
D O I
10.1016/j.jacr.2018.11.031
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: To assess the temporary health impact of prostate multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) and transrectal prostate biopsy in an active surveillance prostate cancer population. Methods: A two-arm institutional review board-approved HIPAA-compliant prospective observational patient-reported outcomes study was performed from November 2017 to July 2018. Inclusion criteria were men with Gleason 6 prostate cancer in active surveillance undergoing either prostate mpMRI or transrectal prostate biopsy. A survey instrument was constructed using validated metrics in consultation with the local patient- and family-centered care organization. Study subjects were recruited at the time of diagnostic testing and completed the instrument by phone 24 to 72 hours after testing. The primary outcome measure was summary-testing-related quality of life (summary utility score), derived from the testing morbidities index (TMI) (scale: 0 = death and 1 = perfect health). TMI is stratified into seven domains, with each domain scored from 1 (no health impact) to 5 (extreme health impact). Testing-related quality-of-life measures in the two cohorts were compared with Mann-Whitney U test. Results: In all, 122 subjects were recruited, and 90% (110 of 122 [MRI 55 of 60, biopsy 55 of 62]) successfully completed the survey instrument. The temporary quality-of-life impact of transrectal biopsy was significantly greater than that of prostate mpMRI (0.82, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.79-0.85, versus 0.95, 95% CI 0.94-0.97; P <.001). The largest mean, domain-level difference was for intraprocedural pain (transrectal biopsy 2.6, 95% CI 2.4-2.8, versus mpMRI 1.3, 95% CI 1.14.5; P <.001). Conclusion: Transrectal prostate biopsy has greater temporary health impact (lower testing-related quality-of-life measure) than prostate mpMRI.
引用
收藏
页码:1385 / 1392
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Impact of Biopsy Compliance on Outcomes for Patients on Active Surveillance for Prostate Cancer
    Detsky, Jay S.
    Ghiam, Alireza Fotouhi
    Mamedov, Alexandre
    Commisso, Kristina
    Commisso, Angela
    Zhang, Liying
    Liu, Stanley
    Klotz, Laurence
    Loblaw, Andrew
    Vesprini, Danny
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2020, 204 (05): : 934 - 940
  • [2] MRI-GUIDED BIOPSY IN ACTIVE SURVEILLANCE OF PROSTATE CANCER
    Kinnaird, Adam
    Yerram, Nitin
    O'Connor, Luke
    Brisbane, Wayne
    Sharma, Vidit
    Chuang, Ryan
    Jayadevan, Rajiv
    Ahdoot, Michael
    Daneshvar, Michael
    Priester, Alan
    Delfin, Merdin
    Tran, Elizabeth
    Barsa, Danielle
    Sisk, Anthony
    Reiter, Robert
    Felker, Ely
    Raman, Steve
    Kwan, Lorna
    Choyke, Peter
    Merino, Maria
    Wood, Bradford
    Turkbey, Baris
    Pinto, Peter
    Marks, Leonard
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2021, 206 : E284 - E285
  • [3] DOES MRI-FUSION PROSTATE BIOPSY IMPROVE RISK RECLASSIFICATION FOR PATIENTS WITH PROSTATE CANCER ON ACTIVE SURVEILLANCE COMPARED TO TRANSRECTAL ULTRASOUND-GUIDED SATURATION BIOPSY
    Hubner, Nicolai
    Evans, Christopher
    Yap, Stanley
    Corwin, Michael
    Mcgahan, John
    Loehfelm, Thomas
    Dall'Era, Marc
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2017, 197 (04): : E521 - E522
  • [4] CLINICAL UTILITY OF MRI/FUSION BIOPSY IN PROSTATE CANCER PATIENTS ON ACTIVE SURVEILLANCE
    Hamilton, Zachary
    Nseyo, Unwanaobong
    Cotta, Brittney
    Schenker-Ahmed, Natalie
    Karow, David
    Kader, A. Karim
    Kane, Christopher
    Parsons, J. Kellogg
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2017, 197 (04): : E556 - E556
  • [5] Patients' anxieties and fears: a comparison between transrectal prostate biopsy and prostate MRI
    Steinkohl, Fabian
    Luger, Anna K.
    Gruber, Leonhard
    Pichler, Renate
    Heidegger, Isabel
    Bektic, Jasmin
    Aigner, Friedrich
    TRANSLATIONAL ANDROLOGY AND UROLOGY, 2024, 13 (10) : 2201 - 2208
  • [6] Standard and saturation transrectal prostate biopsy techniques are equally accurate among prostate cancer active surveillance candidates
    Linder, Brian J.
    Frank, Igor
    Umbreit, Eric C.
    Shimko, Mark S.
    Fernandez, Nicolas
    Rangel, Laureano J.
    Karnes, R. Jeffrey
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2013, 20 (09) : 860 - 864
  • [7] Impact of prostate volume on the active surveillance in prostate cancer
    Beaujouan, Florent
    Bertherat, Walter
    Hammoudi, Zakaria
    Chicaud, Marie
    Descazeaud, Aurelien
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL UROLOGY, 2024,
  • [8] MRI and Active Surveillance for Prostate Cancer
    Porreca, Angelo
    Colicchia, Michele
    Busetto, Gian Maria
    Ferro, Matteo
    DIAGNOSTICS, 2020, 10 (08)
  • [9] Role of Prostate MRI in the Setting of Active Surveillance for Prostate Cancer
    Galgano, Samuel J.
    Glaser, Zachary A.
    Porter, Kristin K.
    Rais-Bahrami, Soroush
    MOLECULAR & DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING IN PROSTATE CANCER: CLINICAL APPLICATIONS AND TREATMENT STRATEGIES, 2019, 1126 : 49 - 67
  • [10] Utility of MRI fusion-targeted transrectal prostate biopsy and prostate health index in detection of clinically significant prostate cancer
    Leow, J.
    Yeow, Y.
    Tan, T.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2019, 26 : 84 - 85