Efficacy, Safety, and Economics of Innovative Medicines: The Role of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis and Managed Entry Agreements in Practice and Policy

被引:5
|
作者
Fens, Tanja [1 ,2 ,3 ]
van Puijenbroek, Eugene P. [3 ,4 ]
Postma, Maarten J. [1 ,2 ,3 ,5 ,6 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Univ Groningen, Univ Med Ctr Groningen UMCG, Dept Hlth Sci, Groningen, Netherlands
[2] Univ Groningen, Univ Med Ctr Groningen UMCG, Inst Sci Hlth Aging & HealthcaRE SHARE, Groningen, Netherlands
[3] Univ Groningen, Groningen Res Inst Pharm, Sch Sci & Engn, Dept PharmacoTherapy Epidemiol & Econ, Groningen, Netherlands
[4] Netherlands Pharmacovigilance Ctr Lareb, sHertogenbosch, Netherlands
[5] Univ Groningen, Fac Econ & Business, Dept Econ Econometr & Finance, Groningen, Netherlands
[6] Univ Airlangga, Fac Med, Dept Pharmacol & Therapy, Surabaya, Indonesia
[7] Univ Padjadjaran, Ctr Excellence Higher Educ Pharmaceut Care Innova, Bandung, Indonesia
来源
关键词
health technology assessment; multi-criteria decision analysis; managed entry agreements; monitoring systems; innovative medicines; regulatory policy; health-economics; HEALTH TECHNOLOGY-ASSESSMENT; EVIDEM FRAMEWORK; ANALYSIS MCDA; EFFICIENCY; EQUITY; HTA; REFLECTIONS; UNCERTAINTY; OUTCOMES; SOCIETY;
D O I
10.3389/fmedt.2021.629750
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
Through the years, solutions for accelerated access to innovative treatments are implemented in models of regulatory approvals, yet with limited data. Besides efficacy data, providing adequate safety data is key to transferring conditional marketing authorization to final marketing authorization. However, this remains a challenge because of the restricted availability and transferability of such data. Within this study, we set up a challenge to analyze the answers of two questions. First, from regulatory bodies' point of view, we bring the question of whether multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) is an adequate tool for further improvement of health technology assessment (HTA) of innovative medicines. Second, we ask if managed entry agreements (MEAs) pose solutions for facilitating the access to innovative medicines and further strengthening the evidence base concerning efficacy and effectiveness, as well as safety. Elaborating on such challenges brought us to conclude that increasing the attention to safety in MCDAs and MEAs will increase the trust of the authorities and improve the access for the manufacturers and the early availability of safe and effective medicines for the patients.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] USING GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS AND MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION ANALYSIS TO ADDRESS SPATIALLY EXPLICIT PROBLEMS IN HEALTHCARE POLICY DECISION MAKING
    Broekhuizen, H.
    Broekhuizen, M. A.
    IJzerman, M. J.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2015, 18 (07) : A482 - A482
  • [42] Addressing preference heterogeneity in public health policy by combining Cluster Analysis and Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis: Proof of Method
    Kaltoft, Mette Kjer
    Turner, Robin
    Cunich, Michelle
    Salkeld, Glenn
    Nielsen, Jesper Bo
    Dowie, Jack
    HEALTH ECONOMICS REVIEW, 2015, 5
  • [43] Addressing preference heterogeneity in public health policy by combining Cluster Analysis and Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis: Proof of Method
    Mette Kjer Kaltoft
    Robin Turner
    Michelle Cunich
    Glenn Salkeld
    Jesper Bo Nielsen
    Jack Dowie
    Health Economics Review, 5
  • [44] Potential Criteria for Frameworks to Support the Evaluation of Innovative Medicines in Upper Middle-Income Countries-A Systematic Literature Review on Value Frameworks and Multi-Criteria Decision Analyses
    Jakab, Ivett
    Nemeth, Bertalan
    Elezbawy, Baher
    Karadayi, Melis Almula
    Tozan, Hakan
    Aydin, Sabahattin
    Shen, Jie
    Kalo, Zoltan
    FRONTIERS IN PHARMACOLOGY, 2020, 11
  • [45] On the constructive role of multi-criteria analysis in complex decision-making: An application in radiological emergency management
    Turcanu, C.
    Carle, B.
    Paridaens, J.
    Hardeman, F.
    SAFETY, RELIABILITY AND RISK ANALYSIS: THEORY, METHODS AND APPLICATIONS, VOLS 1-4, 2009, : 89 - 96
  • [46] Site selection for managed aquifer recharge in the city of Kabul, Afghanistan, using a multi-criteria decision analysis and geographic information system
    Hussaini, Mohammad Salem
    Farahmand, Asadullah
    Shrestha, Sangam
    Neupane, Sanjiv
    Abrunhosa, Manuel
    HYDROGEOLOGY JOURNAL, 2022, 30 (01) : 59 - 78
  • [47] Identification of feasible regions for managed aquifer recharge in the Republic of Cyprus using a co-participative multi-criteria decision analysis
    Panagiotou, Constantinos F.
    Eisenreich, Sarah
    Barouta, Olga T.
    Chekirbane, Anis
    Martins, Tiago
    Neophytides, Stelios
    Khemiri, Khaoula
    Stefan, Catalin
    GROUNDWATER FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, 2024, 27
  • [48] Multi-criteria decision analysis in spatial decision support: the ASSESS analytic hierarchy process and the role of quantitative methods and spatially explicit analysis
    Hill, MJ
    Braaten, R
    Veitch, SM
    Lees, BG
    Sharma, S
    ENVIRONMENTAL MODELLING & SOFTWARE, 2005, 20 (07) : 955 - 976
  • [49] Evaluating the Efficacy of Probiotics in IBS Treatment Using a Systematic Review of Clinical Trials and Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis
    Ceccherini, Cecilia
    Daniotti, Sara
    Bearzi, Claudia
    Re, Ilaria
    NUTRIENTS, 2022, 14 (13)
  • [50] Employing multi-criteria decision analysis to select sustainable point-of-use and point-of-entry water treatment systems
    Hamouda, M. A.
    Anderson, W. B.
    Huck, P. M.
    WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY-WATER SUPPLY, 2012, 12 (05): : 637 - 647