Different attitudes in the management of different types of status epilepticus: A survey study among neurologists demonstrating evidence gap

被引:0
|
作者
Gomceli, Yasemin Bicer [1 ]
Altindag, Ebru Aykutlu [2 ]
Baykan, Betul [3 ]
机构
[1] Antalya Educ & Res Hosp, Dept Neurol, Antalya, Turkey
[2] Istanbul Univ, Dept Neurol, Istanbul Florence Nightingale Hosp, Istanbul, Turkey
[3] Istanbul Univ, Istanbul Med Fac, Dept Neurol, Istanbul, Turkey
来源
关键词
Antiepileptic drugs; epilepsia partialis continua; nonconvulsive status epilepticus; status epilepticus; survey;
D O I
10.4103/NSN.NSN_70_20
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Purpose: The aim is to identify current diagnostic and therapeutic approach to different types of status epilepticus (SE) including convulsive SE (CSE), non-CSE (NCSE), and epilepsia partialis continua (EPC) to detect unmet needs and problems encountered during the management of these neurological emergencies in our country, Turkey. Methods: The specifically designed SE survey included 31 questions that were related to the incidence, the distribution of etiological causes, the diagnostic process, and the treatment approaches of the neurologists and individual electroencephalography (EEG) facilities of the institutions. Results: The total number of respondents was 152 with a median years of experience in professional practice of 10.8 years (1-39 years). The great majority of the neurologists preferred diazepam plus phenytoin as the first choice drug in the treatment of CSE. Of the respondents, only 55% accepted the SE as refractory after applying the second drug and they monitored these patients in the intensive care unit (ICU). Most of the participants (67.7%) did not provide any treatment except the standard medical approaches, while only 39 (30.7%) had used immunotherapy in the treatment of super-refractory SE. Forty-seven respondents (37%) indicated that they had difficulty identifying NCSE on EEG. While 37% of the participants treated EPC patients with preserved consciousness in ICU by general anesthesia, only 15% were previously applied immunotherapy. Strikingly, 41% of the participants stated that they did not feel themselves as sufficiently competent in terms of practical and theoretical knowledge about the management of SE. Conclusion: We demonstrated that there are no standardized attitudes for the management of different types of SE among neurologists. It is worth to emphasize that the neurologists did not feel themselves sufficiently competent in terms of practical and theoretical knowledge, especially with regard to the subtypes of SE.
引用
收藏
页码:37 / 44
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] PROSPECTIVE SURVEY OF STATUS EPILEPTICUS MANAGEMENT IN DIFFERENT HOSPITAL SETTINGS
    Rossetti, A.
    Novy, J.
    Ruffieux, C.
    Burnand, B.
    Logroscino, G.
    EPILEPSIA, 2009, 50 : 85 - 85
  • [2] Retrospective multicentre observational study on clinical management and treatment of different types of status epilepticus in clinical practice
    de la Morena Vicente, M. A.
    Granizo Martinez, J. J.
    Ojeda Ruiz de Luna, J.
    Pelaez Hidalgo, A.
    Luque Alarcon, M.
    Navacerrada Barrero, F. J.
    Husseini, S. Al Hussayni
    Garcia Cobos, E.
    Ballesteros Plaza, L.
    de las Casas Camara, G.
    Viudez Jimenez, I.
    NEUROLOGIA, 2017, 32 (05): : 284 - 289
  • [3] PNESSE 1: Psychogenic status and status epilepticus: Could they be distinguished retrospectively? A survey among neurologists
    Kholi, Helene
    Bellier, Alexandre
    Vercueil, Laurent
    EPILEPSY & BEHAVIOR, 2020, 102
  • [4] Different types of status epilepticus lead to different levels of brain damage in rats
    Tilelli, CQ
    Del Vecchio, F
    Fernandes, A
    Garcia-Cairasco, N
    EPILEPSY & BEHAVIOR, 2005, 7 (03) : 401 - 410
  • [5] The neurophysiologic types of nonconvulsive status epilepticus: EEG patterns of different phenotypes
    Sutter, Raoul
    Kaplan, Peter W.
    EPILEPSIA, 2013, 54 : 23 - 27
  • [6] The management of refractory generalised convulsive and complex partial status epilepticus in three European countries:: a survey among epileptologists and critical care neurologists
    Holtkamp, M
    Masuhr, F
    Harms, L
    Einhäupl, KM
    Meierkord, H
    Buchheim, K
    JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY NEUROSURGERY AND PSYCHIATRY, 2003, 74 (08): : 1095 - 1099
  • [7] Comparison of different practices of therapeutic coma in status epilepticus management
    Alvarez, V.
    Lee, J. W.
    Westover, M. B.
    Drislane, F. W.
    Novy, J.
    Faouzi, M.
    Marchi, N.
    Dworetzky, B. A.
    Rossetti, A.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY, 2016, 23 : 87 - 87
  • [8] Management of status epilepticus in Malaysia: A national survey of current practice and treatment gap
    Lim, Kheng-Seang
    Khoo, Ching -Soong
    Fong, Si -Lei
    Tan, Hui-Jan
    Fong, Choong Yi
    Mohamed, Ahmad Rithauddin
    Rashid, Azmi Abdul
    Law, Wan-Chung
    Shaikh, Mohd Farooq
    Khalid, Raihanah Abdul
    Tan, Raymond Yen -Leong
    Ahmad, Sherrini Bazir
    Chinnasami, Suganthi
    Wong, Sau-Wei
    Raymond, Azman Ali
    Epilepsy Council Malaysia
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NEUROSCIENCE, 2023, 114 : 25 - 31
  • [9] Different types of Status Epilepticus may lead to similar hippocampal epileptogenesis processes
    Santos, Victor R.
    Tilelli, Cristiane Q.
    Fernandes, Artur
    de Castro, Olagide Wagner
    Del-Vecchio, Flavio
    Garcia-Cairasco, Norberto
    IBRO NEUROSCIENCE REPORTS, 2023, 15 : 68 - 76
  • [10] Electroencephalographic Patterns in Different Types of Status Epilepticus - Association with Specific Syndromes and Prognostic Significance
    Roesche, J.
    Rantsch, K.
    Walter, U.
    Wittstock, M.
    Benecke, R.
    KLINISCHE NEUROPHYSIOLOGIE, 2015, 46 (03)