The Circle of Security Parenting Program (COS-P): A Randomized Controlled Trial of a Low Intensity, Individualized Attachment-Based Program With at-Risk Caregivers

被引:0
|
作者
Zimmer-Gembeck, Melanie J. [1 ,2 ]
Rudolph, Julia [1 ]
Edwards, Elia-Jade [1 ]
Swan, Kellie [1 ,2 ]
Campbell, Shawna M. [1 ,2 ]
Hawes, Tanya [1 ]
Webb, Haley J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Griffith Univ, Sch Appl Psychol, Parklands Dr G40 7-86, Southport, Qld 4222, Australia
[2] Menzies Hlth Inst Queensland, Southport, Qld, Australia
关键词
parenting; Circle of Security; externalizing behaviors; stress; reflective functioning; CHILD INTERACTION THERAPY; BEHAVIORAL OUTCOMES; SENSITIVITY; EFFICACY; INTERVENTION; METAANALYSIS; INSECURE; INFANTS;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
The Circle of Security-Parenting Intervention (COS-P; Cooper et al., 2009) is a psychoeducational program for caregivers of young children that has been widely disseminated. The program is founded in attachment theory and relies on computer-delivered content and parent reflection and discussion to teach concepts of safety and security to promote better caregiver-child relationships and child wellbeing. The present study is a randomized controlled trial of COS-P, individually delivered to 85 Australian caregivers (51 COS-P, 34 waitlist control) who reported parenting distress and child disruptive behaviors. Caregivers completed a baseline assessment and repeated the assessment after completion of COS-P or 8 weeks on the waitlist. Caregivers completed surveys to report child symptoms, and parenting stress, anxious and avoidant attachment, reflective functioning, parenting practices, and depressive symptoms. No differences in COS-P vs. waitlist participants were found at baseline. Analyses of complete data (35 COS-P, 25-26 waitlist) revealed a greater decline in caregivers' attachment anxiety and negative parenting relative to waitlist, but only attachment anxiety in intent-to treat analyses. Other improvements were found, but these extended to both the COS-P and waitlist conditions and did not differ between conditions. Overall, effects of COS-P were small and rarely significant, suggesting the need to consider alternative programs that have evidence of effectiveness when providing services to at-risk families.
引用
收藏
页码:208 / 223
页数:16
相关论文
共 26 条