Evaluation of the Didactic Transposition Process in Teaching Integral: Face-to-Face versus Online Education

被引:3
|
作者
Sevimli, Eyup [1 ]
机构
[1] Istanbul Medeniyet Univ, Fac Educ Sci, Math & Sci Educ Dept, Istanbul, Turkey
关键词
STUDENT;
D O I
10.1564/tme_v29.1.04
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
This study aims to evaluate the university lecturers' teaching content preferences in different teaching environments at the undergraduate level of mathematics. The content that lecturers use in teaching the concept of integral is evaluated through a comparison of face-to-face and virtual classroom settings. With comparative case study being used out of interpretive paradigm patterns, the course contents and reflective interview findings of lecturers are analysed descriptively. Findings of the study show that compared to face-to-face classes, the integration content that requires algebraic approaches are preferred less and while the content requiring numerical and contextual approaches are preferred more in virtual classrooms. Participants considered the processes of using different representations and transiting external sources as an advantage in virtual classrooms, and they also claimed that face-to-face classes were more effective in the calculation of integral and proof processes. The other necessary components for improving teaching in virtual classrooms were discussed within the framework of technological content knowledge and epistemological beliefs.
引用
收藏
页码:37 / 48
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Employer Perceptions of Online Versus Face-to-Face Degree Programs
    Roberto, Katherine J.
    Johnson, Andrew F.
    JOURNAL OF EMPLOYMENT COUNSELING, 2019, 56 (04) : 180 - 189
  • [22] The psychodermatology diploma: comparing the online versus the face-to-face experience
    Poot, F.
    Sampogna, F.
    Tomas-Aragones, L.
    Gieler, U.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY, 2021, 185 (03) : E86 - E86
  • [23] Sustainable Math Education of Female Students during a Pandemic: Online versus Face-to-Face Instruction
    AbdelSalam, Hanadi Mohamed
    Pilotti, Maura A. E.
    El-Moussa, Omar J.
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 13 (21)
  • [24] Online university education is the new normal: but is face-to-face better?
    Stevens, Garry John
    Bienz, Tobias
    Wali, Nidhi
    Condie, Jenna
    Schismenos, Spyros
    INTERACTIVE TECHNOLOGY AND SMART EDUCATION, 2021, 18 (03) : 278 - 297
  • [25] Age and gender and their influence on instructor perspectives of online versus face-to-face education at a Jesuit institution
    Fish, Lynn A.
    Snodgrass, Coral R.
    JOURNAL OF EDUCATION FOR BUSINESS, 2019, 94 (08) : 531 - 537
  • [27] Face-to-Face, or Online, That Is the Question
    Gao, Chunming
    Goda, Bryan
    SIGITE'18: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 19TH ANNUAL SIG CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY EDUCATION, 2018, : 60 - 60
  • [28] Teaching in a pandemic: a comparative evaluation of online vs. face-to-face student outcome gains
    Helen Onyeaka
    Paolo Passaretti
    Jaimie Miller-Friedmann
    Discover Education, 3 (1):
  • [29] A comparison of online versus face-to-face teaching delivery in statistics instruction for undergraduate health science students
    Fletcher Lu
    Manon Lemonde
    Advances in Health Sciences Education, 2013, 18 : 963 - 973
  • [30] Academic performance, teacher assessment and student-teacher interaction in online versus face-to-face teaching
    Fernandez-Castro, Alejandro M.
    Sanchez-Cabrero, Roberto
    Eiadat, Yousef Hussein
    REVISTA DIGITAL DE INVESTIGACION EN DOCENCIA UNIVERSITARIA-RIDU, 2023, 17 (02):