Evaluation of the Didactic Transposition Process in Teaching Integral: Face-to-Face versus Online Education

被引:3
|
作者
Sevimli, Eyup [1 ]
机构
[1] Istanbul Medeniyet Univ, Fac Educ Sci, Math & Sci Educ Dept, Istanbul, Turkey
关键词
STUDENT;
D O I
10.1564/tme_v29.1.04
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
This study aims to evaluate the university lecturers' teaching content preferences in different teaching environments at the undergraduate level of mathematics. The content that lecturers use in teaching the concept of integral is evaluated through a comparison of face-to-face and virtual classroom settings. With comparative case study being used out of interpretive paradigm patterns, the course contents and reflective interview findings of lecturers are analysed descriptively. Findings of the study show that compared to face-to-face classes, the integration content that requires algebraic approaches are preferred less and while the content requiring numerical and contextual approaches are preferred more in virtual classrooms. Participants considered the processes of using different representations and transiting external sources as an advantage in virtual classrooms, and they also claimed that face-to-face classes were more effective in the calculation of integral and proof processes. The other necessary components for improving teaching in virtual classrooms were discussed within the framework of technological content knowledge and epistemological beliefs.
引用
收藏
页码:37 / 48
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Inclusive education: pedagogical approach to online versus face-to-face teaching
    Baysan, Aylin
    Naeem, Usman
    FRONTIERS IN EDUCATION, 2023, 8
  • [2] Neuromarketing Applied to Education. Analysis of face-to-face versus online teaching.
    Bellido Garcia, Isabel
    Lomello, Magdalena
    Serrano Agudelo, Daniel
    Olarte Valencia, Michael Stiwen
    Perez Micharet, Paula
    de Medrano Gutierrez, Ana Larios
    Gil Escobedo, Joaquin
    Fernandez Magdalena, Ana Isabel
    Nicolas Mera, Alejandro
    Jimenez Galera, Maria Irene
    Juarez Varon, David
    VIII CONGRESO DE INNOVACION EDUCATIVA Y DOCENCIA EN RED, IN-RED 2022, 2022, : 1359 - 1373
  • [3] Feedback as a Powerful Teaching Tool: Online Versus Face-to-Face
    Nistor, Cristina Mihaela
    Comanetchi, Doina
    NEW TECHNOLOGIES AND REDESIGNING LEARNING SPACES, VOL II, 2019, : 110 - 115
  • [4] Face-to-face versus online tutoring support in distance education
    Price, Linda
    Richardson, John T. E.
    Jelfs, Anne
    STUDIES IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2007, 32 (01) : 1 - 20
  • [5] Comparison of face-to-face teaching and online teaching in neurosurgery education for medical students
    Jun Shen
    Shaolin Zhang
    Dongdong Sun
    Ruixiang Ge
    Sansong Chen
    Jincheng Fang
    Qian An
    BMC Medical Education, 25 (1)
  • [6] Is Teamwork Different Online Versus Face-to-Face? A Case in Engineering Education
    Goni, Julian
    Cortazar, Catalina
    Alvares, Danilo
    Donoso, Urania
    Miranda, Constanza
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2020, 12 (24) : 1 - 18
  • [7] A Connectivist Perspective of the Transition from Face-to-Face to Online Teaching in Higher Education
    Cowan, P.
    Neil, P. S.
    Winter, E.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES IN LEARNING, 2013, 8 (01) : 10 - 19
  • [8] Face-to-Face Versus Online Tutoring Support in Humanities Courses in Distance Education
    Richardson, John T. E.
    ARTS AND HUMANITIES IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2009, 8 (01) : 69 - 85
  • [9] An evaluation of remote communication versus face-to-face in clinical dental education
    Martin, N.
    Lazalde, O. Martinez
    Stokes, C.
    Romano, D.
    BRITISH DENTAL JOURNAL, 2012, 212 (06) : 277 - 282
  • [10] An evaluation of remote communication versus face-to-face in clinical dental education
    N. Martin
    O. Martínez Lazalde
    C. Stokes
    D. Romano
    British Dental Journal, 2012, 212 : 277 - 282