Biomechanical principles of anterior and posterior instrumentation in scoliosis

被引:0
|
作者
Eysel, P [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Mainz, Orthopad Klin, D-55101 Mainz, Germany
来源
ORTHOPADE | 2000年 / 29卷 / 06期
关键词
scoliosis; surgical treatment; biomechanic;
D O I
10.1007/s001320050489
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Scoliosis is a complex deformity of the spine with an abnormal shape in all different planes. Purpose of the study is to describe different biomechanical aspects of the operative treatment on the basis of own experimental results and of a review of the literature. The corrective loads, the resistance of the curvature, principles of different implants, the stability of the instrumented spine and problems of implant fixation are discussed. Corrective loads are divided in forces of distraction, compression, translation and rotation. Distraction is more beneficial for severe curvatures (> 50 degrees), while transverse load is ideal for milder deformities (< 50 degrees). Compression is only efficient when applied segmental and anterior. Resistance increases with increasing of the curvature due to the deformation of vertebral bodies. Release is possible anteriorly by open technique or endoscopically and posteriorly by concave thoracoplasty. Principles of different implants are shown: Harrington- (distraction), Luque- (translation), VDS- (compression, rotation), CD- (combined loading posterior) and Kaneda-System (combined loading - anterior). It is possible to perform a primary stable fusion of the spine anterior and posterior. The stability provided by three anterior devices (VDS, TSRH, CDH) has been studied in an in-vitro model. TSRH was found to be significantly (p < 0.05) higher in stiffness in flexion/extension and torsion than VDS. In bending there was no statistical difference. In all tests CDH was significantly more stable than VDS. In flexion/extension it proved higher in stiffness than TSRH, no statistical difference was observed in bending and rotation. Bone density plays a crucial role in implantfixation, this is more important anterior than posterior. Pedicular screws are superior in their fixational strength than lamina hooks and screws in the vertebral body.
引用
收藏
页码:507 / 517
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A Comparison of Anterior and Posterior Instrumentation for Restoring and Retaining Sagittal Balance in Patients With Idiopathic Adolescent Scoliosis
    Tao, Fenghua
    Wang, Zhiwei
    Li, Ming
    Pan, Feng
    Shi, Zhicai
    Zhang, Ye
    Wu, Yungang
    Xie, Yang
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SPINAL DISORDERS & TECHNIQUES, 2012, 25 (06): : 303 - 308
  • [22] Single-rod versus dual-rod anterior instrumentation for idiopathic scoliosis -: A biomechanical study
    Lowe, TG
    Enguidanos, ST
    Smith, DAB
    Hashim, S
    Eule, JM
    O'Brien, MF
    Diekmann, MJ
    Wilson, L
    Trommeter, JM
    [J]. SPINE, 2005, 30 (03) : 311 - 317
  • [23] BIOMECHANICAL ANALYSIS OF ANTERIOR AND POSTERIOR INSTRUMENTATION SYSTEMS AFTER CORPECTOMY - A CALF-SPINE MODEL
    GURR, KR
    MCAFEE, PC
    SHIH, CM
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 1988, 70A (08): : 1182 - 1192
  • [24] Is there a role for selective anterior instrumentation in neuromuscular scoliosis?
    Devi Prakash Tokala
    Khai S. Lam
    Brian J. C. Freeman
    John K. Webb
    [J]. European Spine Journal, 2007, 16 : 91 - 96
  • [25] ANTERIOR SPINAL FUSION WITH TSRH INSTRUMENTATION FOR SCOLIOSIS
    沈建雄
    赵宏
    邱贵兴
    金今
    叶启彬
    林进
    王以朋
    翁习生
    [J]. Chinese Medical Sciences Journal, 2003, (01) : 41 - 45
  • [26] Is there a role for selective anterior instrumentation in neuromuscular scoliosis?
    Tokala, Devi Prakash
    Lam, Khai S.
    Freeman, Brian J. C.
    Webb, John K.
    [J]. EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2007, 16 (01) : 91 - 96
  • [27] SCOLIOSIS INDUCED BY ANTERIOR AND POSTERIOR RHIZOTOMY
    SUK, SI
    SONG, HS
    LEE, CK
    [J]. SPINE, 1989, 14 (07) : 692 - 697
  • [28] Comparison of anterior and posterior double-rod instrumentation for thoracic idiopathic scoliosis: results of 141 patients
    Michael Thomas Muschik
    Holger Kimmich
    Thomas Demmel
    [J]. European Spine Journal, 2006, 15 : 1128 - 1138
  • [29] Staged Anterior Release and Posterior Instrumentation in Correction of Severe Rigid Scoliosis (Cobb Angle >100 Degrees)
    Kandwal P.
    Goswami A.
    Vijayaraghavan G.
    Subhash K.R.
    Jaryal A.
    Upendra B.N.
    Jayaswal A.
    [J]. Spine Deformity, 2016, 4 (4) : 296 - 303
  • [30] The effect of continued posterior spinal growth on sagittal contour in patients treated by anterior instrumentation for idiopathic scoliosis
    D'Andrea, LP
    Betz, RR
    Lenke, LG
    Harms, J
    Clements, DH
    Lowe, TG
    [J]. SPINE, 2000, 25 (07) : 813 - 817