Biomechanical principles of anterior and posterior instrumentation in scoliosis

被引:0
|
作者
Eysel, P [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Mainz, Orthopad Klin, D-55101 Mainz, Germany
来源
ORTHOPADE | 2000年 / 29卷 / 06期
关键词
scoliosis; surgical treatment; biomechanic;
D O I
10.1007/s001320050489
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Scoliosis is a complex deformity of the spine with an abnormal shape in all different planes. Purpose of the study is to describe different biomechanical aspects of the operative treatment on the basis of own experimental results and of a review of the literature. The corrective loads, the resistance of the curvature, principles of different implants, the stability of the instrumented spine and problems of implant fixation are discussed. Corrective loads are divided in forces of distraction, compression, translation and rotation. Distraction is more beneficial for severe curvatures (> 50 degrees), while transverse load is ideal for milder deformities (< 50 degrees). Compression is only efficient when applied segmental and anterior. Resistance increases with increasing of the curvature due to the deformation of vertebral bodies. Release is possible anteriorly by open technique or endoscopically and posteriorly by concave thoracoplasty. Principles of different implants are shown: Harrington- (distraction), Luque- (translation), VDS- (compression, rotation), CD- (combined loading posterior) and Kaneda-System (combined loading - anterior). It is possible to perform a primary stable fusion of the spine anterior and posterior. The stability provided by three anterior devices (VDS, TSRH, CDH) has been studied in an in-vitro model. TSRH was found to be significantly (p < 0.05) higher in stiffness in flexion/extension and torsion than VDS. In bending there was no statistical difference. In all tests CDH was significantly more stable than VDS. In flexion/extension it proved higher in stiffness than TSRH, no statistical difference was observed in bending and rotation. Bone density plays a crucial role in implantfixation, this is more important anterior than posterior. Pedicular screws are superior in their fixational strength than lamina hooks and screws in the vertebral body.
引用
收藏
页码:507 / 517
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Biomechanical principles of anterior and posterior instrumentation in scoliosis [Biomechanische korrekturprinzipien ventraler und dorsaler instrumentationen bei skoliosen]
    Eysel P.
    [J]. Der Orthopäde, 2000, 29 (6): : 507 - 517
  • [2] COMBINED ANTERIOR AND POSTERIOR INSTRUMENTATION AND FUSION IN SCOLIOSIS
    ENSLIN, TB
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 1977, 59 (02): : 255 - 255
  • [3] ANTERIOR AND POSTERIOR INSTRUMENTATION AND FUSION OF THORACOLUMBAR SCOLIOSIS DUE TO MYELOMENINGOCELE
    MCMASTER, MJ
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 1987, 69 (01): : 20 - 25
  • [4] Combined anterior and posterior instrumentation in severe and rigid idiopathic scoliosis
    Viola Bullmann
    Henry F. H. Halm
    Tobias Schulte
    Thomas Lerner
    Thomas P. Weber
    Ulf R. Liljenqvist
    [J]. European Spine Journal, 2006, 15 : 440 - 448
  • [5] Combined anterior and posterior instrumentation in severe and rigid idiopathic scoliosis
    Bullmann, V
    Halm, HFH
    Schulte, T
    Lerner, T
    Weber, TP
    Liljenqvist, UR
    [J]. EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2006, 15 (04) : 440 - 448
  • [6] ANTERIOR INSTRUMENTATION FOR SCOLIOSIS
    DWYER, AF
    [J]. ISRAEL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, 1973, 9 (06): : 805 - 812
  • [7] Comparison of anterior and posterior instrumentation for correction of adolescent thoracic idiopathic scoliosis
    Betz, RR
    Harms, J
    Clements, DH
    Lenke, LG
    Lowe, TG
    Shufflebarger, HL
    Jeszensky, D
    Beele, B
    [J]. SPINE, 1999, 24 (03) : 225 - 239
  • [8] Relapsing pancreatitis after combined anterior and posterior instrumentation for neuropathic scoliosis
    Korovessis, PG
    Stamatakis, M
    Baikousis, A
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SPINAL DISORDERS, 1996, 9 (04): : 347 - 350
  • [9] Biomechanical evaluation of anterior spinal instrumentation systems for scoliosis -: In vitro fatigue simulation
    Shimamoto, N
    Kotani, Y
    Shono, Y
    Kadoya, K
    Abumi, K
    Kaneda, K
    Minami, A
    [J]. SPINE, 2001, 26 (24) : 2701 - 2708
  • [10] Biomechanical analysis of anterior versus posterior instrumentation following a thoracolumbar corpectomy
    Viljoen, Stephanus V.
    Watson, Nicole A. DeVries
    Grosland, Nicole M.
    Torner, James
    Dalm, Brian
    Hitchon, Patrick W.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2014, 21 (04) : 577 - 581