Explicit and implicit knowledge in approximate reasoning and cognitive modeling.

被引:0
|
作者
Rybalov, A [1 ]
Yager, RR [1 ]
机构
[1] Jerusalem Coll Technol, IL-91160 Jerusalem, Israel
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Humans acquire knowledge interacting with environment. Generally people use two types of knowledge bases: explicit and implicit. The former induced externally and imposed by society. It consists of publicly known noncontradictory propositions. Implicit knowledge, on the other hand, is that unique to the individual and permits degree of conflict. Both types of knowledge are using approximate reasoning. The former is based on deduction, whereas the latter on induction. In deductive reasoning inferences are based on reinforcement of constrains. The models for this type of reinforcement can be based on strong entailment. The spirit of strong entailment is to remove troublesome inferences if the conflict arises. In entailed proposition maximum membership grade is no greater than maximum membership grade in premise. Inductive reasoning is one where inferences are based on removing constrains. It can be modeled through other inference mechanism in approximate reasoning, e.g. weak entailment. This framework can be used to provide a psychoanalytical cognitive model of human mind where implicit knowledge represents 'It', and explicit knowledge constitutes 'Super-Ego'.
引用
收藏
页码:365 / 370
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] COGNITIVE BINDING - A COMPUTATIONAL-MODELING ANALYSIS OF A DISTINCTION BETWEEN IMPLICIT AND EXPLICIT MEMORY
    METCALFE, J
    COTTRELL, GW
    MENCL, WE
    JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE, 1992, 4 (03) : 289 - 298
  • [32] The interaction of implicit learning, explicit hypothesis testing learning and implicit-to-explicit knowledge extraction
    Sun, Ron
    Zhang, Xi
    Slusarz, Paul
    Mathews, Robert
    NEURAL NETWORKS, 2007, 20 (01) : 34 - 47
  • [33] Implicit and explicit approaches to the study of cognitive styles
    Lobanov, A.
    Pevneva, A.
    VOPROSY PSIKHOLOGII, 2023, 69 (04) : 75 - +
  • [34] Dissociating explicit and implicit category knowledge with fMRI
    Reber, PJ
    Gitelman, DR
    Parrish, TB
    Mesulam, MM
    JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE, 2003, 15 (04) : 574 - 583
  • [35] Management of explicit and implicit knowledge in consulting companies
    Bodendorf, F
    Uelpenich, S
    INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY: CODING AND COMPUTING, PROCEEDINGS, 2002, : 485 - 490
  • [36] Nursing Knowledge Development: Making the Implicit, Explicit
    Flanagan, Jane
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NURSING KNOWLEDGE, 2019, 30 (02) : 67 - 67
  • [37] GRAMMATICAL COMPETENCE AND EXPLICIT AND IMPLICIT GRAMMATICAL KNOWLEDGE
    Bojicic, Gordana
    LINGUA MONTENEGRINA, 2014, 14 : 69 - 83
  • [38] IMPLICIT/EXPLICIT KNOWLEDGE AND LANGUAGE PEDAGOGY - A REPLY
    ELLIS, R
    TESOL QUARTERLY, 1994, 28 (01) : 166 - 172
  • [39] Implicit and explicit knowledge in second language acquisition
    Rebuschat, Patrick
    Williams, John N.
    APPLIED PSYCHOLINGUISTICS, 2012, 33 (04) : 829 - 856
  • [40] The emergence of explicit knowledge from implicit learning
    Goujon, Annabelle
    Didierjean, Andre
    Poulet, Sarah
    MEMORY & COGNITION, 2014, 42 (02) : 225 - 236