Clinker Efficiency in the Treatment of Low-Plasticity Clay

被引:2
|
作者
Avci, Eyubhan [1 ]
Mollamahmutoglu, Murat [2 ]
机构
[1] Bursa Tech Univ, Dept Civil Engn, 152 Evler St,2-10, TR-16330 Yildirim Bursa, Turkey
[2] Gazi Univ, Dept Civil Engn, Yukselis St 5, TR-06570 Ankara, Turkey
关键词
Clinker; Ordinary portland cement; Clay; Strength; Compressibility; Swelling; HIGH WATER-CONTENT; ENGINEERING BEHAVIOR; CEMENT; STRENGTH; LIME; SOIL; COMPRESSIBILITY;
D O I
10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0002394
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
This paper presented some geotechnical characteristics of low plasticity clay (LPC) treated with clinker in comparison with those of ordinary portland cement (OPC) treated LPC. The chosen percentages of both additives were 10, 12, and 14% for the stabilization of LPC. While the liquid limits of clinker and OPC treated LPC decreased, their plastic limits increased. The liquid limit (LL) and the plastic limit (PL) of clinker treated LPC were found to be lower than those of OPC treated LPC. The optimum moisture content (OMC) and maximum dry density (MDD) of LPC were increased by both clinker and OPC treatment. In addition, the OMC values of clinker treated LPC were higher than those of OPC treated LPC. However, the MDD values of clinker and OPC treated LPC were almost the same. The shear strength of LPC was also increased with the clinker and OPC treatments under both the wet-cured and air-dried conditions. The compressibility and swell characteristics of LPC were considerably reduced by both clinker and OPC treatments. Nevertheless, the swell and compressibility of clinker treated LPC were lower than those of OPC treated LPC. It was found that the clinker was more effective than that of OPC in the treatment of LPC. (c) 2018 American Society of Civil Engineers.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Upsetting of low-plasticity materials within plastic casings
    Vorontsov A.L.
    Russian Engineering Research, 2009, 29 (03) : 283 - 288
  • [22] Liquefaction resistance of fibre reinforced low-plasticity silt
    Chegenizadeh, Amin
    Keramatikerman, Mahdi
    Nikraz, Hamid
    SOIL DYNAMICS AND EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING, 2018, 104 : 372 - 377
  • [23] A study on internal erosion of low-plasticity silty sand
    1600, Southeast Asian Geotechnical Society (47):
  • [24] Drained and undrained strength interpretation for low-plasticity silts
    Brandon, TL
    Rose, AT
    Duncan, JM
    JOURNAL OF GEOTECHNICAL AND GEOENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING, 2006, 132 (02) : 250 - 257
  • [25] Optimizing the strain conditions of low-plasticity materials on rolling
    Efimenko, SP
    Choporov, VF
    RUSSIAN METALLURGY, 1999, (02): : 50 - 58
  • [26] A Study on Internal Erosion of Low-Plasticity Silty Sand
    Chen, Jing-Wen
    Lin, Bo-Rung
    Lee, Wei F.
    Chen, Yie-Ruey
    GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING, 2016, 47 (03): : 116 - 122
  • [27] Modelling the static liquefaction of sand with low-plasticity fines
    Rahman, M. M.
    Lo, S. -C. R.
    Dafalias, Y. F.
    GEOTECHNIQUE, 2014, 64 (11): : 881 - 894
  • [28] Upsetting of low-plasticity materials within plastic hoops
    Vorontsov A.L.
    Russian Engineering Research, 2009, 29 (05) : 490 - 495
  • [29] Laboratory assessment of the effects of polymer treatment on geotechnical properties of low-plasticity soil slurry
    Reid, David
    Fourie, Andy
    CANADIAN GEOTECHNICAL JOURNAL, 2016, 53 (10) : 1718 - 1730
  • [30] Effect of Plasticity on Shear Behavior of Low-Plasticity Fine-Grained Soil
    Wang, Shuying
    Luna, Ronaldo
    Yang, Junsheng
    JOURNAL OF MATERIALS IN CIVIL ENGINEERING, 2017, 29 (03)